In post 47, manfredd wrote:
I have so many reason Alina;
-wagoning
-his avatar, just want make you to lynch him
-his kind weird half hearted post
The previous post was obviously a joke, and the "jk" wasn't really needed. The fact that a "jk" was added shows some insecurities.
None of his other posts really had anything worth noting.
So on to the replacement:
In post 213, Titus wrote:No problem. Here's a drama causing suggestion. Scum have zero incentive to post bc all the wagons are on town.
VOTE: Brandi
So sorry you drew scum. Have your first vote.
She thinks I'm scum here but with no reason given. Sometimes people like to keep their cards to themselves early on, though.
In post 250, Titus wrote:I would imagine if he was mafia, he wouldn't be pushing slips or what not (driving conversations) but merely "observing" things and letting the comments fuel natural divisions.
In post 263, Titus wrote:Everyone has their own methods. I will learn more about them through this. ika is not a rational player(meaning logical, not implying insanity). You cannot read people by usefulness to you but use their intent.
These are two very good posts. Short and concise but good points that give insight. She seems to want to steer town towards productive thinking.
Overall I really like this slot.