Micro 393: 2012 Primary Mafia (Game Over)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:28 pm

You got a Bachmann pic with your PM and still thought that was Palin in the OP? Yeah right.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:28 pm

In post 74, Aronis wrote:Besides, what makes you think scum have fake claims? Are two of the politicians really that evil?

Elaborate

theaceofspades · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:50 pm

aronis has the republican party pretty well understood. Although most of you would try to kill me if i said who my favorite is.

BUT! at the same time i like the vote on him. The one on whooch is good, but i like this one better. Plus, sarah palin is just tina fey in disguise, who doesn't recognize tina fey? To me his familiarity with said candidates doesn't follow with mixing them up. Also, @Mod, Christie is a moron, plain and simple.

(also i'm really glad SK understood what i was referring to, as it was part of his past. Sadly, nobody laughed)

VOTE: Aronis

Aronis · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:55 pm

Mod, can I post the picture from my Role PM?

Aronis · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:58 pm

In post 75, SleepyKrew wrote:You got a Bachmann pic with your PM and still thought that was Palin in the OP? Yeah right.

In post 76, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 74, Aronis wrote:Besides, what makes you think scum have fake claims? Are two of the politicians really that evil?

Elaborate

You're certainty is alarming. I wouldnt be surprised if you were scum, considering your accusations.

theaceofspades · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:03 pm

In post 28, ArcAngel9 wrote:morning guys...
VOTE: theaceofspades. Miss you dear

Sup chickadee

Aronis · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:05 pm

In post 77, theaceofspades wrote:aronis has the republican party pretty well understood. Although most of you would try to kill me if i said who my favorite is.

BUT! at the same time i like the vote on him. The one on whooch is good, but i like this one better. Plus, sarah palin is just tina fey in disguise, who doesn't recognize tina fey? To me his familiarity with said candidates doesn't follow with mixing them up. Also, @Mod, Christie is a moron, plain and simple.

(also i'm really glad SK understood what i was referring to, as it was part of his past. Sadly, nobody laughed)

VOTE: Aronis

Whom might that be?

I have no fucking clue who Tina Fey is.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:08 pm

Is there any reason

at all

for a fake flavor claim? How is that in any way a useful gambit?

Meh. Fuck that. Let's just abuse lynch all liars to the letter instead of its intention.

That's the true Republican way!!

Aronis · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:09 pm

In post 82, Flubbernugget wrote:Is there any reason
at all
for a fake flavor claim? How is that in any way a useful gambit?

Meh. Fuck that. Let's just abuse lynch all liars to the letter instead of its intention.
That's the true Republican way!!

Can we start with Obama?

TierShift · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:09 pm

This is highly interesting.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:11 pm

In post 79, Aronis wrote:

In post 76, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 74, Aronis wrote:Besides, what makes you think scum have fake claims? Are two of the politicians really that evil?

Elaborate

You're certainty is alarming. I wouldnt be surprised if you were scum, considering your accusations.

I meant elaborate on the second question.
And of course I'm certain. It's a fucking scumslip. Yet I'm still engaging in discourse with you because ???

SleepyKrew · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:11 pm

In post 82, Flubbernugget wrote:Is there any reason
at all
for a fake flavor claim? How is that in any way a useful gambit?

Meh. Fuck that. Let's just abuse lynch all liars to the letter instead of its intention.
That's the true Republican way!!

Do you have any idea what's going on

SleepyKrew · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:12 pm

Because I can't figure out what that post is trying to say at all

Aronis · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:14 pm

In post 85, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 79, Aronis wrote:

In post 76, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 74, Aronis wrote:Besides, what makes you think scum have fake claims? Are two of the politicians really that evil?

Elaborate

You're certainty is alarming. I wouldnt be surprised if you were scum, considering your accusations.

I meant elaborate on the second question.
And of course I'm certain. It's a fucking scumslip. Yet I'm still engaging in discourse with you because ???

Tbh, I dont understand the scumslip. What does me mixing two ppl up have to do with alignment?

Flubbernugget · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:16 pm

In post 57, SleepyKrew wrote:I think Aronis just scumslipped? I believe he is Sarah Palin, with a Michelle Bachmann fakeclaim. I just checked and found that Palin decided not to run in 2012. I originally guessed that the scum were going to be dirty liberals, but it looks like it's Republicans that didn't run.
Now, why do I think Aronis scumslipped?
Aronis originally said that his role isn't pictured. That leads me to believe that his actual role is Sarah Palin. However, he then says the Bachmann pic is of Palin. So he's essentially saying he's Bachmann? I don't think Bachmann and Palin look alike, but maybe that's because I know who they are. I guess someone not familiar with them could get them confused. But Aronis has clearly demonstrated that he is familiar with these people! If you can tell Romney apart from Perry apart from Huntsman, you can tell Palin and Bachmann apart. This leads me to believe that he got his real role and fakeclaim accidentally mixed up, and is now trying to cover that up.
Also his little ad hom attempt now is amusing. Is it scum trying to deflect? idk I think it's scummy but that's confirmation bias.
Whooch is still my pick for partner, but slip > read.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Aronis

So they scumslipped because they fucked up which politician they are? Did I miss somewhere that certain politicians are confirmed scum?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:17 pm

It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

Aronis · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:18 pm

In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:18 pm

In post 89, Flubbernugget wrote:So they scumslipped because they fucked up which politician they are? Did I miss somewhere that certain politicians are confirmed scum?

Reread my argument, and don't ignore the word "fakeclaim" this time.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:19 pm

In post 91, Aronis wrote:
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:20 pm

Is Aronis even voting me

Aronis · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:26 pm

In post 93, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 91, Aronis wrote:
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.

Words cannot do your stupidity justice.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:27 pm

In post 93, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 91, Aronis wrote:
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.

Just when I thought I was getting on the same page as you.....

SleepyKrew · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:29 pm

In post 96, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 93, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 91, Aronis wrote:
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.

Just when I thought I was getting on the same page as you.....

Yeah I'm sure that was happening

SleepyKrew · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:30 pm

In post 95, Aronis wrote:
In post 93, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 91, Aronis wrote:
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"

How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?

Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.

So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.

Words cannot do your stupidity justice.

"I can't come up with more bullshit."

SleepyKrew · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:31 pm

At least taos gets it.