With 13 alive, it's 7 to lynch
New deadline is on Sunday, September 28, 2014, 11:00 AM {(expired on 2014-09-28 11:00:00)}
Please let us know if you ever see any errors. [/area]
In post 104, massive wrote:In post 76, Boonskiies wrote:Mmmmmmm.... I like playing with Wake. Speaking of reputations...
I be a troll. People who have played with me before know this, so just a reminder:Don't put person to L-1. I WILL MAKE IT HAMMA TIME!!!
In post 88, GreyICE wrote:Who said you were town, boon?
You said that you would play in such a way that you would behave detrimentally to the town. The only reason to consciously do this is a meta game effort to make your scum play indistinguishable from your town play.
Not only is this against the spirit of this site (play to win the game you are in), it's a detestable, pathetic maneuver. You wish to be unable to read? Fine, I grant you your wish, a place on my blacklist , and copious bullets to pump into your corpse.
Vig, kill this useless piece of smurf.
I forgot about Boonskiies's nonsense.93 isn't "overanalyzing" despite what Boon says in 101; it's so much WIFOM I considered photoshopping his name on a box of Franzia. And on top of that, he actually stole that L-1 Autohammer from bjc in 1582 as a Playstyle Methodology? I say let's let the neighbors sort themselves out tomorrow.
vote Boonskiies
In post 1642, FakeGod wrote:In post 1640, Flubbernugget wrote:I'll hammer boon if we can agree to flash lynch the next player to have a quote war with either Csareo or Wake that lasts at least 6 posts collectively.
Don't be daft.
You apparently have recent experience with town Boons.
Well? How does he compare here? Is it true that he would do this kind of shit as a town investigative PR?
In post 1654, Boonskiies wrote:Csareo and BBT - 1 each. BBT was scum the game I played with him.
In post 1657, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 1642, FakeGod wrote:In post 1640, Flubbernugget wrote:I'll hammer boon if we can agree to flash lynch the next player to have a quote war with either Csareo or Wake that lasts at least 6 posts collectively.
Don't be daft.
You apparently have recent experience with town Boons.
Well? How does he compare here? Is it true that he would do this kind of shit as a town investigative PR?
He would.And I can say that after getting lynched in that game D1 and not bothering to look back at it.
This is how confident I am in scum using Wake and Csaero to distract the town.I am willing to give up a PR over it (.evenif it is just a tracker)
In post 1660, Csareo wrote:In post 1654, Boonskiies wrote:Csareo and BBT - 1 each. BBT was scum the game I played with him.
I don't recall playing a game with you, unless it's an alt.
In post 1619, Green Crayons wrote:In post 1549, Green Crayons wrote:@Boon:
Here are the points against you that are convincing me. Please address as you see fit:
In post 493, massive wrote:Immediately after my vote on him, Boon completely disappeared. At the time of your request, he hadn't done anything to make me move my vote, and his vote in 467 was pretty rubbish too. 476 has him casually mention the "double-scum-gambit" possibility which, really, people, can we all agree that's a little obtuse? Like this:
In post 476, Boonskiies wrote:Granted, there's still the possibility of both of you being scum, which in case, it gives even more reason for you guys to try to stay away from a lynch.
makes no sense. If you're both scum, you practically WANT a lynch here, because (to most of us) it would auto-townie the other one. Pushing the double-scum-gambit as even a possibility here just keeps it in people's minds.
In post 1508, massive wrote:750 - Continuing to feed the "neighbors are both scum" conspiracy nonsense.
752 - His BBT vote is based solely on town-reading Csareo. That read is in 352 and is caused by one Csareo post.
<snip>
1235 - Continues to be the only person hunting an SK.
And this:
In post 1500, Boonskiies wrote:I have stated multiple reasons, and any competent person would understand why I'm voting BBT.
Talk to us like we're five and incompetent. Besides what I've mentioned above (the fact that you town-read Csareo) give us the ESPN Highlight Reel of why you are voting BBT.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Boonskiies
Never saw anything that addressed the actual case, only a PR claim. Posting it again.
In post 1657, Flubbernugget wrote:This is how confident I am in scum using Wake and Csaero to distract the town. I am willing to give up a PR over it (even if it is just a tracker).
In post 1661, Boonskiies wrote:In post 1657, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 1642, FakeGod wrote:In post 1640, Flubbernugget wrote:I'll hammer boon if we can agree to flash lynch the next player to have a quote war with either Csareo or Wake that lasts at least 6 posts collectively.
Don't be daft.
You apparently have recent experience with town Boons.
Well? How does he compare here? Is it true that he would do this kind of shit as a town investigative PR?
He would.And I can say that after getting lynched in that game D1 and not bothering to look back at it.
This is how confident I am in scum using Wake and Csaero to distract the town.I am willing to give up a PR over it (.evenif it is just a tracker)
Did he just slip? He talks about how I totally would be trolly as a PR, which I have been, I'll link one if you would like me too. Also, he's willing to give up a PREVENif it'sjusta tracker. Why put the words even and just in there?
In post 1666, Green Crayons wrote:In post 1657, Flubbernugget wrote:This is how confident I am in scum using Wake and Csaero to distract the town. I am willing to give up a PR over it (even if it is just a tracker).
1) Where has scum used wake to distract the town?
2) What does lynching someone that might be a PR prove?
In post 1659, Csareo wrote:Fakegod, I still want you to answer my previous question.
What evidence do you have that boonskies was lying about being a tracker?
In post 1587, FakeGod wrote:Oh, yes. Let's examine Boon ISO.
You're telling me, a Tracker decides to open the game by explaining that he will be trolling this game and that he is a VI.
Then he decides to pick a fight GreyICE for no good reason, fluffs his way through the middle of d1, and late joins prominent wagons.
This is supposed to look like an investigative PR, yes?
Why the hell is he causing mischief left and right and drawing as much attention on to himself?
In post 1658, Csareo wrote:I'm not really sure what actions you want massive to answer for.
In post 1670, Boonskiies wrote:
@Flubber - Why exactly? Because I went against you? I also stated afterwards that I didn't actually think you slipped and I got post happy. But by saying you now feel like I'm not actually a tracker, it implies you were willing to lynch a PR?
Wait, were you talking about my claim and that's how you gave up the PR? Because if so, then I completely misread your post.