FFS I got the wrong impression
ignore the qt slip thing
. This was the post I thought was the slip
In post 474, pirate mollie wrote: In post 471, Titus wrote: In post 458, Titus wrote: In post 455, pirate mollie wrote: In post 424, PeregrineV wrote:Saying that at the time means more than saying it later. The vote timing seemed suspect because at the time all the wagons were about the same 2 or 3 votes, and that one put her at 2 while she had recently voted Stranger (also a wagon), was debating TSO and debating Titus. Reasonless RVS on most active most engaged player?
I have no idea how to handle perv's sheeping and then subsequent wking on a player who wked me when I am sure he doesn't think my play is worth a shit.
halp
There are too many pronouns in this sentence for me to follow.
Help Mollie? Can you translate this but using playernames?
I think that perv's wking of me whilst throwing suspicion on garmr who wked me and saying that he is sus for rvsing in the first place when I am pretty sure perv does not think much of my game was where I was going with that.
Since I only slightly skimmed it this next post made me think mollie had information she didn't.
In post 475, Titus wrote:So let's see if I understand...
Perv attacked Garmr for whiteknighting of you while simulanteously white knighting you?
Then something about RVS?
Can you break down the point more slowly? I'm trying to get premises here to analyze.
With her saying that I thought mollie was accusing pereV of accusing me of white knighting as well which he didn't.
So first idea in my head Hey it must be a qt
. God Titus's misinterpretations are
infectious
!
I thought that Mollie and PereV were in a qt and PereV was white knighting to try and get on her good side and something he said in the qt made her think maybe town because I couldn't see it happening out here.That's why I asked Mollie what she thought of PereV I wanted to know if they were masons or not if they were I would of laid off PereV all together.