If there's any town role with an ascetic modifier, they should claim it now.
Either something extremely strange is going on or we all targeted the same ascetic, because our action was also unsuccessful.
As regards the suspicion on us, I personally both partially forgot about this game and wasn't on MS much at all for the entirety of d1 besides my first post about the odds.
the game kind of rushed in last day phase..... but getting scum is an awesome thing..though it was fluke..it worked well for us.. So that leaves only 1 scum left in the game...
I gotta catch up this game first though..
shit I got hit with the super lazies
probably because I expected my first class today to be cancelled and it wasn't and I somehow made it on time because God smiled down on me
So probably not gonna do anything here today
And I'm busy tomorrow/Saturday because CHICAGO
idk about Sunday
Not gonna go V/LA because I'll still have access and probably will post but just letting y'all know
In post 77, theaceofspades wrote:aronis has the republican party pretty well understood. Although most of you would try to kill me if i said who my favorite is.
BUT! at the same time i like the vote on him. The one on whooch is good, but i like this one better. Plus, sarah palin is just tina fey in disguise, who doesn't recognize tina fey? To me his familiarity with said candidates doesn't follow with mixing them up. Also, @Mod, Christie is a moron, plain and simple.
(also i'm really glad SK understood what i was referring to, as it was part of his past. Sadly, nobody laughed)
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"
How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?
Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.
So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.
Just when I thought I was getting on the same page as you.....
Why did you think you were getting on the same page?
In post 77, theaceofspades wrote:aronis has the republican party pretty well understood. Although most of you would try to kill me if i said who my favorite is.
BUT! at the same time i like the vote on him. The one on whooch is good, but i like this one better. Plus, sarah palin is just tina fey in disguise, who doesn't recognize tina fey? To me his familiarity with said candidates doesn't follow with mixing them up. Also, @Mod, Christie is a moron, plain and simple.
(also i'm really glad SK understood what i was referring to, as it was part of his past. Sadly, nobody laughed)
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"
How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?
Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.
So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.
Just when I thought I was getting on the same page as you.....
Why did you think you were getting on the same page?
mostly what i said there. Actually entirely what i said there. I have a bad habit of not posting if i find someone scummy and already having my vote on them. This was scummy enough to get my vote, but it stayed there after he started reacting negativity
As the king of all cosmos remarked "is it really fun? or that it let's you forget yourself?"
aceofspades is the worst poster on site and anyone that hasn't got him on ignore is doing themselves a disservice ~N
V/LA weekends
for a fake flavor claim? How is that in any way a useful gambit?
Meh. Fuck that. Let's just abuse lynch all liars to the letter instead of its intention.
That's the true Republican way!!
What did you think was going on at the time? I jsut don't understand it.
This is my first game where I have been exposed to flavor claims. It didn't occur to me that they could be used in any way to crack the setup until after I saw speculation about it. So the only use I could see for a mass flavor claim was to try and prove someone was lying about their claim, which I saw no reason for anyone to do.
In post 90, SleepyKrew wrote:It only makes sense to mix them up if they're both in your role PM, meaning one is a fakeclaim, meaning you're scum. Now once again, I'm going to ask you to elaborate on "Are two of the politicians really that evil?"
How do you know Sarah Palin or bachmann is scum?
Oh wait, your buddy is Palin! Sorry about that NvM.
So you're gonna stop trying to justify the mix up? Sweet.
Palin cannot be a town role because she didn't run. Republicans that didn't run make sense as scum.
Just when I thought I was getting on the same page as you.....
Why did you think you were getting on the same page?
Because I understood the rationale behind his scumslip, but misunderstood his setup speculation as a second push against Aronis.
I don't really think flub is scum since his thought process checks out and iirc you were mostly scumreading him for his thought process on aronis and the subsequent vote.
I think phok's reaction in 221 is scummy as fuck. I'd expect town to search for a solution, to find out why exactly they were untargettable last night. After all, I'm assuming townphok not to know why he was untargettable. Ascetic scumphok knows, though, and tries to give some sort of 'come at me bro'-reaction.
I targetted phok because I thought he was scum. I have not played a lot with phok, but read some of his games. His scumgame shows signs of buddying, which I see here. The buddy didn't feel town in general.
VOTE: phok
2 days to deadlinr, I feel like I'm the only one playing.
