In post 250, Aneninen wrote:As for 50Shades, the Nachomamma-head is passive, the Pirate Mollie-head is active.
wtf do you even know me
In post 250, Aneninen wrote:As for 50Shades, the Nachomamma-head is passive, the Pirate Mollie-head is active.
In post 252, MTD wrote:Also I hate your reasons for your scumleans on massive and stavgorin (or whatever the name is).
In post 269, Heartless wrote:nachomollie, please dance with me
i think anenien is a dirty rotten scumbag who needs a heaping helping of death
with a side
of mashed potatoes
agree or disagree?
In post 276, Nero Cain wrote:this post in very lacking in dave and sthar scum reads.
In post 282, GrayFoxxxx wrote:I wasn't rushing him at all so where is he getting this? More of him trying to throw shade on my character to take away from my arguements.
I decided some verbal Judo was the best way of handling that specific quote, instead of arguing about something that didn't matter anyway. Him trying to frame me in that light just makes me think he is scum even more.
In post 289, wgeurts wrote:Ok, everyone here is so much better at mafia than on the other forum. Any articles anywhere I can read to improve?
In post 292, Heartless wrote:>the "catchup" is a bunch of snipey, cutesie comments that don't really say....... anything.
In post 292, Heartless wrote:>OH DEAR, UR SO MAD about people saying hydra names and sthar being a smartass. i say humparumpadumpadump adusapj;lkjk;lf3woijrhfpoiewhjqfjpoiwqejfoqwjefopewqewqjp
In post 292, Heartless wrote:>"lean scum", "lean town" /fart
In post 292, Heartless wrote:>all that aaaaaaaaaaaand the vote ends up on...... mr. lurkaderp no posts
In post 292, Heartless wrote:>the monkeyman read is an undeveloped turd sculpture (of course it's "lean" scum)
In post 292, Heartless wrote:>50 shades magically gets a pass on this very very serious and rigorous "activity" standard because apparently we can't look at the playerlist and SEE WHO THE MAIN ACCOUNTS BEHIND THE HYDRA ARE. they're listed. right. there.
In post 292, Heartless wrote:>nero's scumreads are so weird even though they all fall in the "null" section
In post 292, Heartless wrote:>GOD EVEN THE TOWNREADS come with some shitty modifier. you don't like what about grayfox? something about urging sthar? do what now?
In post 294, Heartless wrote:what the hell are you doing, massive?
In post 296, sthar8 wrote:@wegurots- sink or swim time, boss. I have faith that you can engage and play this game. The only problems you've had so far are philosophical ones stemming from the fact that MS games tend to be better balanced than offsite games. There are several IC-qualified players in here who can answer any terminology or theory questions you have. Who do you think is scum?
In post 303, Heartless wrote:every time i look at this thread and don't see a 50 shades post
my heart breaks
twice
100 pieces of antihero heart.... /sigh
In post 464, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 220, Death Stare wrote:MonkeyMan immediately pounced on it.
The first fallacy town players have to overcome is the "wrong = scum" fallacy. New player making a mistake and new player jumping on it is a pretty typical progression of events.
In post 220, Death Stare wrote:2. wgeurts posted a response in a similar vein to before and MonkeyMan wasted no time in condemning it further.
So?
In post 220, Death Stare wrote:3. None of MonkeyMan's posts after this show any particular willingness to deviate from this.
So?
In post 465, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 221, MonkeyMan wrote:You are right. I shouldn't try to lynch the new scum. I should give them a break since they are new and everything. Why would anyone ever lynch someone because they think they are scummy?
UNVOTE:
this post is also town as balls
In post 300, wgeurts wrote:Also voting monkey if my gut is right would make monkey seem alot less scummy in the case of DS' es death.
In post 482, Death Stare wrote:I didn't support the vote because he was wrong, but because he looked like he was taking advantage of the situation.
In post 482, Death Stare wrote:I didn't notice that he only had around 100 posts, though. That makes the above case basically null, but I still don't like some of the posts he's made since then.
In post 483, Death Stare wrote:In post 465, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 221, MonkeyMan wrote:You are right. I shouldn't try to lynch the new scum. I should give them a break since they are new and everything. Why would anyone ever lynch someone because they think they are scummy?
UNVOTE:
this post is also town as balls
BTW, I'd really like an explanation on this because everything about this post pings.
-Ank
In post 308, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Going to leave my vote where it is for now. Going to look at a few other players as I have tunneled Sthar enough for now.
In post 311, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:but I totally get why you think he is scummy
In post 318, Aneninen wrote:So, I've got home. First of all, as I promised, I would explain why I scumread "early lurkers".
In post 333, Heartless wrote:Anenien kind of seems like the type of guy that really likes to hear himself talk even if he's not necessarily saying much.
In post 352, Aneninen wrote:Also, Mollie, MTD is town in my opinion. Or at least, so far the first one who voted for me in a game because of my fluff has been always town so far.
In post 371, Heartless wrote:mtd would also be a pretty acceptable vote
In post 371, Heartless wrote:deathstare
In post 487, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 308, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Going to leave my vote where it is for now. Going to look at a few other players as I have tunneled Sthar enough for now.
i'm confused
In post 496, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 487, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 308, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Going to leave my vote where it is for now. Going to look at a few other players as I have tunneled Sthar enough for now.
i'm confused
I'm comfortable with my vote on him, but I need to stop tunneling him and see if I can find a stronger scum read.
In post 485, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 482, Death Stare wrote:I didn't support the vote because he was wrong, but because he looked like he was taking advantage of the situation.
Was he from a position to take advantage of the situation as a new player who is not familiar with the site, who is not familiar with any of us as players, and has absolutely no reputation to add that extra "oomph" to his words? No. Does he seem like the type of player who believes he could easily ascend to that type of position? No.
In post 485, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:In post 482, Death Stare wrote:I didn't notice that he only had around 100 posts, though. That makes the above case basically null, but I still don't like some of the posts he's made since then.
Like what?
In post 317, MonkeyMan wrote:I don't need to revote because I know the wagon is going to go nowhere. I am trying to find another person of whom i think is scum.
In post 320, MonkeyMan wrote:A lot of people already scum read you [Death Stare] so I see no point to pursue that either. I also feel like you [Death Stare] have more than 2 votes on you but the votecount says otherwise.