In post 848, Thor665 wrote:Have you ever played with Pere prior to this? I feel like you must have.
He is not only doing a slow start (which I might buy as town him) but is pairing it with sloppy reads and not really looking over the thread (note how he agreed that...whoever that was, Muffin?, who had earlier brought up multiball was scum after it was pointed out. But if he had actually read and also actually thought that was an issue (as shown by his reaction to me) he would have mentioned it.
If he had openly stated he was skimming/sipping stuff - no worries.
But he didn't, he chose to present like he read.
He was probably lying about that.
Why do you think town Pere would do that?
Ta. That will be what I need. To then read some of his other games and form my own opinion.
In post 831, Thor665 wrote: In post 816, AxleGreaser wrote:In order to be convinced PereV is scum, and buy into your ´çase´/wagon I would need to see a continuing pattern of behaviour. I don´t believe your thread discussion with him or the points you have made do that.
What sort of "continuing pattern of behavior" do you expect to get out of an attack on multiball comments?
This seems like a standard that torpedoes many types of scumtells.
I dont expect to get
"continuing pattern of behavior" do you expect to get out of an attack on multiball comments?
(and never said i did)
I do however expect that if PereV got a scum Pm he still has one and thus there should be a continuing pattern of behaviour.
Not seeing that, would suggest to me the former was mix up an aberration or something else.
and no while I have read lots of games of various people, (eg yours and aneninen's first game together, in real time trying to make reads for myself)
I am not familiar with PereV except that he's not a nobody, that unlike other people you referred to earlier mislynching him D1, or vigging him N1, anytime he is town, will IMO hurt town.