so we wouldn't lynch ya boy Juls. it's entirely possible that she has to be alive for the loverization to stay.In post 996, DrippingGoofball wrote:Tell me one good reason why I would fake unloverizing as scum.
hmm.
so we wouldn't lynch ya boy Juls. it's entirely possible that she has to be alive for the loverization to stay.In post 996, DrippingGoofball wrote:Tell me one good reason why I would fake unloverizing as scum.
In post 526, farside22 wrote:In post 521, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 519, farside22 wrote:What is the point of dgb's ability if juls ends after one day.
It's pretty obvious to me that my power exists to immediately remove Juls' action, and that players would be expected to announce their loverizing.
YOU ARE SO SCUM
Why else would you try to paint both Juls and I as scum????????????????????????????????
Says the player not wanting to "confirm" her ability and if you thought HI was town you could, if claim was fact, stop him from being tied to me.
So your reason for wanting to lynch someone you claim a town read on but you claim to be able to prevent it from happening is what now?
In post 458, farside22 wrote:In post 452, Konowa wrote:Wait, farside what exactly are you saying in #448.
I think dgb and juls are scum together.
Juls said the ability ended after 1 night a dgb claimed unlover ability but it seems very unuseful if the ability.