[3]
[3]
[1]
[7]
[3]
[2]
[2]
With 21 alive, it takes 12 to lynch.
Aeronus is V/LA until Thursday
GrayFoxxxx is V/LA until Friday
In post 1072, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1064, Thor665 wrote:And I told you I was buddying you - so you should react to that or not.
vote:Thor
In post 1077, goodmorning wrote:eyyyyyyyyy vanity wagon got legitttt
In post 1073, T S O wrote:
Axle wrote:
Its RVS, making up bullshit is fun?
WHy is it scummy?
It's not scummy?I just disagree with it. That was why I SAID that I didn't agree with anything Aneninen had said.
In post 1074, T S O wrote:Don't get me wrong, though, he's done plenty of scummy shit.
In post 1085, Thor665 wrote:The issue is - you are right, TSO is talking a bit of gak and not backing it up.
However, I would like to point out that is exactly the case on Pere - exactly. Pere said something was scummy, then had to start talking in circles to back it up.
The only big difference is that TSO's thing...yeah, maybe he did decide to just generically fluff off about Anemian in a generic way.
Do you have an explanation for why Pere would do what he did?
Also, considering they are both the same case, and I agree with both of them - why *don't* you like my Pere case exactly?
In post 1088, T S O wrote:The quote I used was "I agree with nothing."
You might have said something else. To be blunt, your posts are weirdly set up and I try to skim them to protect my head.
If we're talking about fucking pissing time down the drain, then you asking me about an RVS post and why it's scummy when it's obviously not fucking scummy is a really good example of that!
In post 1081, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 1073, T S O wrote:
Axle wrote:
Its RVS, making up bullshit is fun?
WHy is it scummy?
It's not scummy?I just disagree with it. That was why I SAID that I didn't agree with anything Aneninen had said.
So why are you pissing my time down the drain, and not even trying to answer the actual question?
In post 1074, T S O wrote:Don't get me wrong, though, he's done plenty of scummy shit.
I aksed you too.
AXLE:
" I will expect you to show me the stuff that you saw back then that is so bad(disgreed with)()not just that it is unarguably bad
but that you conclude for it to be that bad Aneninen must be or is quite likely to be scum, because as town he would not be that bad."
VOTE: TSO
While I am still willing to lynch Scripten today, and for counter wagon (size) purposes consider me on that wagon
However right at this moment I have new more important wagon that i would prefer over take the Scripten wagon...
Stop pissing in my pocket.
I asked you a question, "show me the stuff, to bad to be towny hence must be scummy?"
Then
You showed it to me and claimed it was too bad to be town.
Now you claim its not that at all, you just disagree with it.
Are you even playing mafia?
In post 1089, T S O wrote:But I'd love to hear why I'm scum - you seem to think it's impossible for me to back my Aneninen-scumread up with any actual scummy quotes, since that's all that makes sense for TSO-scum in this situation - so I'd love to hear why I, instead of posting said quotes, randomly didn't because ...??? I'm sure you've got the answer to that.
In post 1091, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 1089, T S O wrote:But I'd love to hear why I'm scum - you seem to think it's impossible for me toback my Aneninen-scumread up with any actual scummy quotes,since that's all that makes sense for TSO-scum in this situation - so I'd love to hear why I, instead of posting said quotes, randomly didn't because ...??? I'm sure you've got the answer to that.
No
I have asked you to dothatyou said you had 1055 queried 1062 reaffirmed that 1065
It turned out you hadnt? 1081
How many attempts will it take you?
Why are you still pissing my time down the drain?
In post 1086, AxleGreaser wrote:Well I found mine, and I always like wagons that I find more than ones dished up to me.
If I dig around in mine, it is still possible TSO is town, but it will only happen if I dig.
In post 1086, AxleGreaser wrote:While you state it is exactly the same, it really isn't from my point of view.
Given the knowledge I had, knowledge = (one bit is i have read my role PM, and another bit is I had very little idea that the game might reasonably likely be multiball.)
When he raised the point that perhaps you had TMI, it looked interesting to me, and I AM town. So its certain for me that it could look interesting to a towny.
My best guess was the odds on Thor making TMI slip like that as scum were so low that the towny explanation was bound to exist and Thor would know what it was whether he was town or scum.
In post 1086, AxleGreaser wrote:Also at one point, you were adding into your case that PereV didn't jump at the other speakers on Multiball. That was BS kinda in that their comments were very different.
They were very different worse in that they made them out of thin air, but yours was different in the level of certainty expressed. How you seemed to overlook those differences is ? to me.
Feels like stitching up, either via you tunnelling or otherwise.
In post 1086, AxleGreaser wrote:Later 848 you asserted a number of things about his play, I don't find them convincing.
I feel confident I would find more towny intention in PereV's than in TSO's respective ISOs
In post 1086, AxleGreaser wrote:Finally one good way to eliminate these distraction/excuse wagons, is to dig around in why people are voting them. Even if PereV is scum, perhaps I found his buddy?
In post 1095, T S O wrote:I'm not answering your questions until you answer mine. I want your scumread on me explained.