In post 1839, Wisdom wrote:Beast didn't, you are prolly lying tho
naw, thats against my wincon.
In post 1839, Wisdom wrote:Beast didn't, you are prolly lying tho
In post 1765, Shinobi wrote:In post 1763, Wisdom wrote:Yeah, I'm not you, but it still does not make sense from a town perspective. You dropped the scumread too easily, and notably you did it when someone mentioned that the 1v1 might be town vs town. And since then you haven't cared about rereading uctriton despite him not being what you'd call the towniest player in the game.
It makes total sense that you did that to appease uctriton. "Come on dude, let's stop fighting, I think you're town now, so please think I'm town too"
And yeah, I'm not attacking you for supporting a wagon on josh, so that made no sense.
You're doing exactly that: you attacked me for "burying Josh" when he already proved that he was making up reasons to read people.
Also, I can kill dave for that last post. I called Mala town several times and I called BBT town several times. He's ignoring parts of my ISO to push me and it stinks.
In post 1766, davesaz wrote:Quotes please.
In post 13, Zebulin wrote:Is there a deadline for those who haven't confirmed?
In post 30, Zebulin wrote:So, are you a vanilla townie or a mason?
In post 38, goodmorning wrote:
Because that post was so utterly overdone it's ridiculous. He's holding the cards in his left hand and telling us to watch the right, but in such an obvious way that it looks to me like a double- or triple-bluff.
I mean, there're a couple different options and not all of them have him as Scum, but it's pretty blatantly manipulative and I don't like it.
In post 55, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You're voting him for bad grammar?
In post 70, Shinobi wrote:The thing you need to understand is that lynching someone because you don't like their playstyle is lynching someone for poor reasoning. Being weird doesn't make him scum. If we actually try to lynch him at this point in the game, it's nothing more than a policy lynch.
In post 1849, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 1232, Josh_B wrote:
If you want to do something productive with your posts, why aren't you looking at the people that voted for NPAU all willy nilly. for no reason, or reasons that didn't make sense?
What do you think about my previous post Josh with this in mind.
In post 1854, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You're scum-reading Wisdom?
In post 1738, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Also, I'm willing to sheep almost anyone onto almost any wagon.
I won't sheep Wisdom or Pea.I might sheep GM or Josh.
I won't vote Huntress.
My vote is yours when you need it.
Go!
In post 1787, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 1024, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Uct and NPAU may be good wagons also. These are based on reading Scripten's ISO now that he be dead.
In post 1026, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:WOW...I really wish I could edit my posts.
Uct or GM for me today.
You (Uct) was from Scripten's ISO I believe.
GM because I thought she was scum D1 and her play D2 hasn't changed my mind.
This was a long, long time ago though.
My top 3 lynches for today would be Wisdom,or Pea.Josh
I feel comfortable that you're town, Uct.
In post 1840, Peabody wrote:Thanks for the replace.
And Mala, are you referencing BBT as a town read? Or did you only mean Shinobi?
In post 1844, Josh_B wrote:Hooray, there's actually a player in the Heph slot.
Mala, I need help . I can't get my head around the hephestus situation. DP1 it was completely ignored. Recently it seems to have gotten some support, at least in name.
Would you say that Heph has been ignored townie, or ignored scum?
I don't recall either of us being attacked for scum reading him. But there wasn't any support for it either.
In post 1843, Shinobi wrote:Kind of busy atm, will post more when I have time.
@Mala: I still need your opinions on the Wisdom/Josh fight.
In post 1866, davesaz wrote:@Shinobi, making a single reference to TvT and saying nothing more is not the same thing as a read. And that single reference does not make "multiple times".
@Mala, it's important for us to have a detailed explanation of your BBT and Shinobi reads, because they're coming up a solid scum read for multiple people. I in particular could use some input because I'm seeing multiple sets of people who could be town who are agreeing with each other or could be scum together.
In post 1864, Malakittens wrote:So yeah my townpool reads look like this {GM, Wisdom, Huntress, BBT, Shinobi, {josh}}
In post 1868, davesaz wrote:In post 1864, Malakittens wrote:So yeah my townpool reads look like this {GM, Wisdom, Huntress, BBT, Shinobi, {josh}}
You're missing at least one definite, really obvious townie. And it's more important to know which of the not listed people is your biggest scum read.
In post 1866, davesaz wrote:@Mala, it's important for us to have a detailed explanation of your BBT and Shinobi reads, because they're coming up a solid scum read for multiple people. I in particular could use some input because I'm seeing multiple sets of people who could be town who are agreeing with each other or could be scum together
In post 252, Shinobi wrote:Okay, let's move on from the fact that I think that question is dumb and I'll give you an answer even though I really don't want to:
Because ISOing players during day 1 isn't going to produce much in the way of findings, especially when you can just read the thread and glean the exact same information but with better context. Using an ISO this early is needless busywork and it's just generally better to ask questions and play the game. Even if you didn't want to talk much, reading the thread is still better because looking at a pure ISO doesn't give you the same quality of read because of a lack of context.
And that isn't even getting into the fact that nothing of importance has actually warranted an ISO dive, in my opinion.
So how does this answer make me readable in any way? How does this help you figure out my alignment?
In post 583, Shinobi wrote:I haven't really been paying attention to this game much, so consider this somewhat of a prod dodge/catch up post.
BBT vs Mala looks almost exactly like a bog-standard TvT fight: lots of point-by-point analysis being done on each other and lots of passion from both sides. I'd really like you two to stop fighting and to move on to something else, because it looks like you two butt heads every single time you're both in the thread.
I can't even remember where my vote is or why I put it there, so UNVOTE: .
NPAU is scummy for the following reasons: his frequent vote swapping/shoddy reasoning is more in-line with spreading doubt rather than solving the game, but somebody probably already pointed it out.
Someone is going to have to explain the GM wagon to me at some point, and preferably in non-MS terms. Mala's case seems okay but some evidence would be great.
Also, if the people calling me scummy could, like, shut up, that would be great. I'll get more up-to-date at some point.
In post 711, Shinobi wrote:I hate how everyone is drawing associative reads from everything.
I'm looking at them and they all look dumb. Maybe it's just me.
In post 793, Shinobi wrote:Stop worrying about Mala because Mala is town. That entire conversation is basically nothing more than useless meta arguments combined with playstyle clashes, which results in nothing but meaningless white noise. If Mala is somehow scum here, then whatever the fuck you guys are doing basically just gave her a lot to talk about. We are not lynching an outspoken/active player on day 1.
Instead, let's focus on the guy I'm voting. The guy who was posting here not even a minute before I was and then immediately fucks off when I pressure him.
In post 1867, Shinobi wrote:In post 1866, davesaz wrote:@Shinobi, making a single reference to TvT and saying nothing more is not the same thing as a read. And that single reference does not make "multiple times".
Calling a fight between two players town vs town =/= calling them town?
Oh the jubbery.