In post 573, Luca Blight wrote:Are you misrepping me again? I never called Aphix scum, please read my post properly. You also seem to be assuming I'm going to vote Aphix when there has been nothing from my posts to suspect that is the case. Until I have read through again, my view on Aphix remains the same as it was then.
I didn't say Aphix in that sentence.
I am assuming you will vote Aphix. Maybe you will prove me wrong. Maybe you won't.
Catchup, do one of the two.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
In post 568, House wrote:2) Killing one party of the whole aphix/Klingon mud slinging contest will provide clarity to the game
So it's a policy lynch because you can't handle people tunneling each other?
That sounds like an absolutely horrible reason for a lynch, but that's just me.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
In post 573, Luca Blight wrote:Are you misrepping me again? I never called Aphix scum, please read my post properly. You also seem to be assuming I'm going to vote Aphix when there has been nothing from my posts to suspect that is the case. Until I have read through again, my view on Aphix remains the same as it was then.
I didn't say Aphix in that sentence.
I am assuming you will vote Aphix. Maybe you will prove me wrong. Maybe you won't.
Catchup, do one of the two.
But the point you made about 'leaving myself open to vote him further down the road', which that was in response to, was about Aphix, was it not?
Hey Guys.
Nacho: I'm not sitting on an RVS scumread. Fuck you for thinking that. The statement of calling them scum was RVS and for intent and purposes of getting reactions. All of you have continued pushing that into some sort of scummy play. And half the push on me seems to be in regards to that. Which is letting scum push a mislynch on me. She says my games make me scum. I'd like to know where that comes from refusing to provide that indicates there isn't any information there. That bullshit push is more then enough for me to scum read her rather it was on me or anyone else. You can't say, I have evidence this person is scum and then not provide it.
My scum read came from klingon when I tried to actually have a conversation and she refused to do anything. To whoever stated klingon has posted content. Please show me where. I've seen her call me scum. She hasn't actually provided any reasons for that. Literally the whole game has been blank.
WBO is a worthless pile. Beyond VI play I also see scum motivation. I've mentioned why.
House: I feel has been completely evasive, and continues to be in my opinion. He is also dreadfully manipulative with his votes currently. And seems not concerned at all where they go.
Everyone else is very null, because noones posting shit or taking any sort of real stand.
I again like how I stop posting. Everyone does. really this town is going to just die in apathetic bullshit.
I've been very clear in my opinions and stances this game. Think this makes me scum?! GO READ MY FUCKING SCUM GAMES. Rarely am I aggressive or opinionated. Luckily it hasn't changed this time around. Seriously. If you believe klingons claim that my meta makes me scum you haven't looked at any of my games at all.
I'll be more then happy to hang out here for intent to hammer, but I'm not getting notifications or anything else. Though wouldn't be suprised in this game for some dickhead to hammer without a claim.
UNVOTE:
fuck this game. I honestly don't know where I stand on a lynch if we aren't going to lynch scum so ... we'll see how it goes.
In post 573, Luca Blight wrote:Are you misrepping me again? I never called Aphix scum, please read my post properly. You also seem to be assuming I'm going to vote Aphix when there has been nothing from my posts to suspect that is the case. Until I have read through again, my view on Aphix remains the same as it was then.
I didn't say Aphix in that sentence.
I am assuming you will vote Aphix. Maybe you will prove me wrong. Maybe you won't.
Catchup, do one of the two.
But the point you made about 'leaving myself open to vote him further down the road', which that was in response to, was about Aphix, was it not?
Why are you assuming I will vote Aphix?
No, it was about every one of your scum suspects ever.
I am assuming you will vote Aphix because he's the easiest wagon at the time being and you've been posturing for the path of least resistance.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
In post 568, House wrote:2) Killing one party of the whole aphix/Klingon mud slinging contest will provide clarity to the game
So it's a policy lynch because you can't handle people tunneling each other?
That sounds like an absolutely horrible reason for a lynch, but that's just me.
Way 2 misrep.
Those that think Nacho is telling the truth, read moar.
Those that think Nacho is telling the truth, read moar.
If you are lynching someone to provide clarity to the game, your reasoning is policy. You gave the reasoning, I called it out as policy.
Where's the misrep?
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
In post 555, House wrote:I would engage you on your vote if you talked to me about it, but you refused to do that, so.
I've not been fond of aphix as town since... well... pretty much the day I replaced in.
I gave him some town cred after your defense of him, thinking I might have it wrong... but with my suspicion of you being scum (which is looking more and more likely), that town cred vanished.
In post 573, Luca Blight wrote:Are you misrepping me again? I never called Aphix scum, please read my post properly. You also seem to be assuming I'm going to vote Aphix when there has been nothing from my posts to suspect that is the case. Until I have read through again, my view on Aphix remains the same as it was then.
I didn't say Aphix in that sentence.
I am assuming you will vote Aphix. Maybe you will prove me wrong. Maybe you won't.
Catchup, do one of the two.
But the point you made about 'leaving myself open to vote him further down the road', which that was in response to, was about Aphix, was it not?
Why are you assuming I will vote Aphix?
No, it was about every one of your scum suspects ever.
I am assuming you will vote Aphix because he's the easiest wagon at the time being and you've been posturing for the path of least resistance.
As I've said, how is it possible to post a readslist without leaving yourself open to voting people, especially with your first catch-up post on day one? It isn't realistically possible. You were clearly referring to Aphix in that post, you are trying to make out I scumread him when there is nothing to suggest this is the case.
In what way have I been 'posturing for the path of least resistance'? Are you really basing this on one catch-up post I made, having just skimmed 20 pages?