In post 1887, Newbie wrote: In post 1878, acryon wrote:Here is what I have on Newbie:
If Newbie liked the post, then why would the vote move back to Wisdom based on that conclusion of mine? Then, after wguerts posts, the vote is removed once again.
Just because I didn't agree with some things in the post doesn't mean I didn't like it.
Yeash, but this is what I asked you:
In post 1268, acryon wrote:
You indicated that you unvoted to hear what I had to say. I assume you have some comments on what you did/didn't like about what I had to say for the vote to come back?
Obviously I was asking you what you disagreed with re: Wisdom, because that was the whole point of your unvote. Why would you say you liked it if you (clearly) disagreed with my Wisdom conclusion when it was the primary thing you were concerned about at the time?
Re: Mathdino as town.
In short, he is scum-hunting. His questions aren't empty; they are directed toward finding the scum. Him and I both unfortunately have come to a number of the same wrong conclusions, but it seems pretty clear that he is genuinely looking for scum. While wall-posts and high posting activity are certainly not alignment-indicative, his content is on-point. I don't see fallacies in his arguments; I don't see witch-hunting; I don't see misrepresentation. He has been thinking critically about the game, and he gives reasons for all of his reads and for the direction he is going. If Mathdino were scum, I doubt all of the above would apply to him. So if he is scum, he is doing a very good job, although I doubt he is.
Also,
UNVOTE: 
