Mini 1625: Redemption (Game Over)

[GGG]

@Naiomi,

My vote on you served its purpose, it got you to better explain your town reason for why you posted what you did, so I unvoted.

I defended whomp because people lynch bad townies too often rather than scum and the wagon was forming quickly. If he was just trolling he wasn't going to defend himself and when he hit l-1 he was just going to self hammer.

[Naomi-Tan]

I've read your post, im standing with my post.

[Naomi-Tan]

I've Edited the day countdown into my Signature. so we don't have to search for it.

[Whomping Willow]

Please quote where droog is defending me and not just attacking you

This is called deflection. Thanks for admitting this.

Wat

Is it that hard to understand?

Player C attacks and/or questions Player B.
Player A wants to defend Player B.
Player A could straight up defend them, by answering their questions and saying why they are town, but if they are scum buddies, this implicates both of them.
Opposite of that, Player A instead attacks Player C.

Deflection 101.

"Everyone who attacks me must be scum in cahoots"

[GGG]

I really don't like riddles and isots dayvig sequence. It looks staged. It looks like they waited for a chance to do it. I ask about Daychat then riddle a and ISOt escalate it to a fake dayvig. If riddle is town and likes using fake day vigs why use that moment as the fake dayvig. And why so quickly ask if you are scum. If it was a gambit slow playing after the kill would get far better reactions then just a straight are you scum question.

Isotts reaction kind of seems normal but the Riddleton just bails on the gambit without allowing isott to fully react. Emotion is tough to fake for very long so ending it quickly serves the scum.

I don't like the whole interaction.

VOTE: Riddleton

[Riddleton]

Istott's reaction is town like I said, he sounded genuinly annoyed that he couldn't play on. I see no need to draw out the reaction test when his reaction clearly indicated to me he was town.

[GGG]

Istott's reaction is town like I said, he sounded genuinly annoyed that he couldn't play on. I see no need to draw out the reaction test when his reaction clearly indicated to me he was town.

Why Isott, why this early, why did you just blatantly ask if he is scum?

[droog]

isott behaved realistically
riddleton gave up with too little push

[Riddleton]

The purpose of the reaction test was to see how Istott would respond to my fake dayvig and see if it's townlike. Once that goal was satisfied, there's no reason to continuing pushing it. Why do you think it's bad to 'give up' on it when I've already drawn a solid conclusion from the test (ie. that Istott is town)?

[droog]

Game over, pal. You scum?

Hm ok. Istott is town.

Im not sure why you didn't string it ong more

[Whomping Willow]

But makes you so certain that he didn't just call your bluff?

Pedit: Ninja'd

[GGG]

The purpose of the reaction test was to see how Istott would respond to my fake dayvig and see if it's townlike. Once that goal was satisfied, there's no reason to continuing pushing it. Why do you think it's bad to 'give up' on it when I've already drawn a solid conclusion from the test (ie. that Istott is town)?

Why IStOt
Why this early in the game. This type of gambit only works once. And would work much better later once there is suspicion built up.

[Riddleton]

Im not sure why you didn't string it ong more

Why would I?

Why IStOt
Why this early in the game. This type of gambit only works once. And would work much better later once there is suspicion built up.

I was suspicious of him at the time. If he was scum faking the newbie persona, then there would be signs that he's familiar with other stuff on the site (e.g. knowledge that dayvigs are faked). See here.

I disagree to your thoughts regarding the gambit itself. It's best in the early game to get conversations and questions going (which you all are doing so far with me).

[Flubbernugget]

Dayvig reaction tests are gay

[Flubbernugget]

Please quote where droog is defending me and not just attacking you

This is called deflection. Thanks for admitting this.

Wat

Is it that hard to understand?

Player C attacks and/or questions Player B.
Player A wants to defend Player B.
Player A could straight up defend them, by answering their questions and saying why they are town, but if they are scum buddies, this implicates both of them.
Opposite of that, Player A instead attacks Player C.

Deflection 101.

Thats called a chainsaw (is that deflection too?)

And it would have held more weight if you quoted the posts you were asked to post.

[crazypianist1116]

Dayvig reaction tests are gay

Please don't violate sitewide rules again.

[Flames682]

I don't know enough about RL mafia to gauge whether isott should have picked up on that highly blatant fakevig. But Riddleton capitulated on that read far too easily for my liking and Flames is being too hardline with it, Riddleton doing that and declaring istott town seems pointless as scum though, and he atleast did something to try and develop a read, which Flames349 has yet to do.

No, shut the fuck up.

And to spell it out for you WW, I'm leaning scum on istott.

[Flames682]

Istott's reaction is town like I said, he sounded genuinly annoyed that he couldn't play on. I see no need to draw out the reaction test when his reaction clearly indicated to me he was town.

Because it was so obvious that it was FAKED, so he acted town.

[Whomping Willow]

Well someone's angry. Is the the second quote supposed to demonstrate something?

[Flames682]

Im not sure why you didn't string it ong more

Why would I?

Why IStOt
Why this early in the game. This type of gambit only works once. And would work much better later once there is suspicion built up.

I was suspicious of him at the time. If he was scum faking the newbie persona, then there would be signs that he's familiar with other stuff on the site (e.g. knowledge that dayvigs are faked). See here.

I disagree to your thoughts regarding the gambit itself. It's best in the early game to get conversations and questions going (which you all are doing so far with me).

It was a terrible reaction test that never works ever.

[Flames682]

Are you dumb Womping

[Whomping Willow]

It's W

^H

omping, Flames495

[Whomping Willow]

And I ask again. Is the second quote meant to demonstrate something?

[Flames682]

No I just put it there for the hell of it of course Womping.

[Naomi-Tan]

I'm not gonna comment on the reaction test stuff, I don't understand the test properly, so I'm just gonna let this lie and not respond to it, as I don't get it, and commenting on it as if I got it, would be miss leading as my lack of getting it is not useful information for town to get.