Mini 1625: Redemption (Game Over)

[Flames682]

I am rude, thank you.

Rude is not anti-town.

[istott]

No, anti-town is the wrong word. I'd say it's unhelpful and unneeded.

[Flames682]

You generalise a lot, often erroneously:
Post 88
Post 135
Post 268


You deflect:
Post 138
Post 299

And on a side note, you're rude (not scum behaviour, but still anti town.) these quotes will be in my next post.

Post 88 was pretty accurate.
Post 135 had one exception.
Post 268 isn't my post.

Post 138 I have no idea what you're saying
Post 299 was making a joke, that's scummy how?

[Flames682]

No, anti-town is the wrong word. I'd say it's unhelpful and unneeded.

So, scummy because of that? No.

[Flubbernugget]

So is's read actually is omgus

[droog]

Speaking of neighbours. I was under the impression that droog and riddle were real life neighbours, not mafia neighbors.

this would be cool
no we're maf neighbors

[droog]

as in
theres a privat topic
im harassing him tonight

[Naomi-Tan]

Ok this is most likely a stupid question but why can i see titles under peoples names they surely can't be correct can they?

If so then I think I'm seeing something I'm not suppose to see

I'm going to leave this here and see what other people think since nobody commented on it at the time. Munkir's subtitle is Townsperson. He seems inexperienced enough for this post to be a legitimate question. If he weren't town, he wouldn't have asked the question, seeing the contradiction with his own role.

That being said the rest of his posts have virtually no content and I would have had him on my leaning scum list. Not sure how to feel.

I don't know what to say honestly and I don't want to die so i feel as though if i put my opinion out there i will be targeted by nefarious forces but at the same time I'm being targeted because I'm not putting out my opinion its like Naomi said before game lots of WIFOM here

It is equally important to get your read on things as every bodies else's, weather it is right or wrong doesn't matter, because options are subjective in this matter and as long as its on topic it will only be more useful to town then scum (assuming your town)

[Whomping Willow]

Post 88 was pretty accurate.

It wasn't

Post 135 had one exception.

That "one exception" invalidated the entire statement

Post 138 I have no idea what you're saying
Post 299 was making a joke, that's scummy how?

Both were you responding to posts but with no actual content response and evading the actual meat of what you were responding to

[Flames682]

Both were you responding to posts but with no actual content response and evading the actual meat of what you were responding to

Wow, kind of like your useless votes.

[Flames682]

That "one exception" invalidated the entire statement

Bullshit

[Flames682]

It wasn't

It was.

[droog]

Both were you responding to posts but with no actual content response and evading the actual meat of what you were responding to

Wow, kind of like your useless votes.

sorry what
is willow's present game obviated
because he was a troll for the first 5 pages

[Whomping Willow]

Both were you responding to posts but with no actual content response and evading the actual meat of what you were responding to

Wow, kind of like your useless votes.

This post is another example of it. Very meta.

That "one exception" invalidated the entire statement

Bullshit

If there's an exception to something you say is always true then it's invalidated, I bring you back to my green apples analogy

It wasn't

It was.

Burden of proof is on you. Why should a player not use their vote to pressure someone?

[Flames682]

If there's an exception to something you say is always true then it's invalidated, I bring you back to my green apples analogy

So you're saying that PLs are the most common and scum lynches are not with that analogy.

[Flames682]

Burden of proof is on you. Why should a player not use their vote to pressure someone?

Because it doesn't work.

[Whomping Willow]

If there's an exception to something you say is always true then it's invalidated, I bring you back to my green apples analogy

So you're saying that PLs are the most common and scum lynches are not with that analogy.

No, you miss the point. Ignore the apples and just consider the first clause if the analogy confuses you.

Burden of proof is on you. Why should a player not use their vote to pressure someone?

Because it doesn't work.

If you're going to argue that pressure votes have never worked or that a player shouldn't bother voting because it's unlikely to make scum spontaneously combust then it's not an argument you're going to win

[Flames682]

that a player shouldn't bother voting because it's unlikely to make scum spontaneously combust

Thank you for bending my words.

[istott]

No, anti-town is the wrong word. I'd say it's unhelpful and unneeded.

So, scummy because of that? No.

No. You're not scummy because of that.

[Flames682]

No, you miss the point. Ignore the apples and just consider the first clause if the analogy confuses you.

The exception is rare and was not relevant to the topic.

[GGG]

Whomping and flames

Are either of you reading eachother as scummy through this process or is this just pointless bickering. If it is just bickering just quit as it isn't putting anything of value out there and essentially stopping any productive discussion.

[istott]

I meant 269, flames568.

[Flames682]

269 was also true isottttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

[Whomping Willow]

@GGG His aggression feels town but it's also disproportionate and he's making absolutely no sense so I'm trying to understand his thought process

[istott]

I'm also suspicious of your aggression, flames7.34