In post 3248, Josh_B wrote:I'm still pretty sure that Garmr isn't scum.
Why are you pretty sure about that?
In post 3248, Josh_B wrote:I'm still pretty sure that Garmr isn't scum.
In post 3243, Ankamius wrote:Hey. Garmr.
My last couple posts were on a tablet. Trying to type anything on it is like pulling teeth, so I cut as much out as I can to be able to post at all in any timely fashion. You no longer have any ground to try to discredit me based on that angle.
---
Now that that's out of the way, one question before I go into it:
1. How exactly does her case relate to herself more than you?
In post 3224, pirate mollie wrote:
the same way it has always been
1/4 of the playerlist sometimes plus an sk sometimes this is included in the 1/4 or a traitor. it really depends on the mod.
you can cherry pick all the fuck you want cos your case is solely based on that. I get the feeling you know I am town but think it will be some sort of "coup" if you get me lynched. personally i think it is a dickish move. it shld be obv if scum actually thought that I was the sk and nked 1 of their own they wld nk me and if they didn't they would try to get me lynched...which is what you are trying to do.it seems like you and titus were obsessed with the skand do you know who worries about sks it is scum that is who. just look at titus and this is an all around objective tell that you missed. instead you were too busy trying to tie titus and I together as grpscum until you stepped away from that and decided to push an sk angle since that was a big component of your case.
I say look at the nero/kise/possibly ank slot. garmr for possible sk or fuck if I know possible grpscum I dunno.
house and titus's exchanges were weird.
eta: house continues to be weird.
/done
In post 3201, PeregrineV wrote:In post 3199, TiphaineDeath wrote:IAI-Titus-AJ Were scum, Three scum flips mean it's time to do some serious connection/POE shit, wall coming in the next day or two.
Would like to see everyone do this, to some extent.
In post 3208, Ankamius wrote:In post 3200, TiphaineDeath wrote:Oh, and scum def had daytalk, that's big.
Go ahead and explain what you mean.
In post 3254, Ankamius wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is why your response to her making a case on you today is to completely ignore it and try to discredit it entirely based on the SK-read. Your response is that she makes cases that apply more to herself than you. You haven't proven this correct in context to what I was asking. Instead, what you did was use that type of logic from previous day phases to discount an entire case on you made on THIS day phase without addressing it any way. This makes no sense and the way you immediately tried to discredit me when I pressured you on that post doesn't make me feel any better about it.
In post 3259, Garmr wrote:This shows me your improvising.
In post 3260, Ankamius wrote:
You completely missed the point of that post.
I'm trying to figure out your motivations for the posts right after the mollie case and that post explains why it doesn't from a town mindset.
I don't really care as much about the content itself.It doesn't matter how good of an answer you have to a questionif the way you went about it is slimy.
I'm not on my tablet anymore, either. The post where I said I was is when I returned to my desktop.
In post 3261, Ankamius wrote:In post 3259, Garmr wrote:This shows me your improvising.
This is how I play as both alignments, btw.
In post 3258, d3x wrote:Oh... nvm. For some reason, I thought Garmr was calling mollie GroupScum. He's not. He's saying we should Lynch her based off SK suspicion. This is the wrong play, regardless.
In post 3267, Formerfish wrote:Are we your lynch pool because we are voting Mollie?
If you're not going to read the game {I don't blame you, there's a lot of boring stuff in there}, please don't act like the Town deaths from the SK weren't justified. Unless you're telling me that you read and had vezo and IHNC as TownReads.In post 3263, Formerfish wrote:Why is this the wrong play? If she is the sk she killed one of ours last night.
In post 3262, Garmr wrote:In post 3260, Ankamius wrote:
You completely missed the point of that post.
I'm trying to figure out your motivations for the posts right after the mollie case and that post explains why it doesn't from a town mindset.
I don't really care as much about the content itself.It doesn't matter how good of an answer you have to a questionif the way you went about it is slimy.
I'm not on my tablet anymore, either. The post where I said I was is when I returned to my desktop.
You haven't done anything to prove that comes from a scum mindset other than say it is. You talked about IAI faking a read about me and trying to say that makes me scum. But guess what he might be trying to set up a fake read on town in case they get lynched for brownie points. There is plenty of reasons to fake a read as scum. -_-
Also the post you said that you proved it doesn't come from a town mindset was that flail more scum?Because I thought mollie case was stupid and didn't think anyone was dumb enough to buy into it as it was very easy to prove wrong. Also you make the case out to be bigger than it was.
In post 3262, Garmr wrote:In post 3261, Ankamius wrote:In post 3259, Garmr wrote:This shows me your improvising.
This is how I play as both alignments, btw.
So you don't think as town or scum great to know then your no big loss for future games.
In post 3247, Ankamius wrote:In post 3245, Josh_B wrote:With two goons dead and the encrypter making NK's I'm sorry that I ever brought up the possibility of multiball. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that the remaining scum are more likely to be better PR's.
This was exactly why IaI's posting on Garmr pinged me.