Mini 1625: Redemption (Game Over)

[Flubbernugget]

GGG why don't you want to vote crazy?

[GGG]

Ok this is most likely a stupid question but why can i see titles under peoples names they surely can't be correct can they?

If so then I think I'm seeing something I'm not suppose to see

I'm going to leave this here and see what other people think since nobody commented on it at the time. Munkir's subtitle is Townsperson. He seems inexperienced enough for this post to be a legitimate question. If he weren't town, he wouldn't have asked the question, seeing the contradiction with his own role.

That being said the rest of his posts have virtually no content and I would have had him on my leaning scum list. Not sure how to feel.

This post here is why crazy is currently in my leaning town list.

[GGG]

You guys are boring. I'll make a proper post later

Oh my goodness he talks. And doesn't say anything except saying we're all boring. Amazing. I can imagine his next post now:

"Guys, I was just trying to get information in RVS. I did and you're clearly all scummy."

Pro-tip willow, your actions were pretty anti-town.

But In isoing him I don't like this post. He is presupposing the next argument to make whomping look worse then he is.

[GGG]

Flubbs, what is your case on CP. I am not seeing it in your ISO?

I saw his inconsistent tone as a red flag and dropped a naked vote to see what would happen. He completely lost his shit and got way too defensive. He can make any case he wants but his intentions scream self preservation over scumhunting.

What inconsistent tone. Could you identify which posts show a change in tone?

[droog]

Droog prove to me you're not buddying me. I feel like you're buddying me.

do you want me to yell at you like kuribo
i could say you have a rusty fork prong for a tongue
and a dick to match
but i honestly dont give a fuck

if you want to suspect the one person not using bullshit
'i dont like x therefore anti town therefore scum' logic
vote me

so not no going to convince you

[droog]

something about ishtott has been ringing hollow lately
maybe ill do an iso through him

still dont like awa
ochrist hasnt bugged me in a while

[GGG]

Droog prove to me you're not buddying me. I feel like you're buddying me.

do you want me to yell at you like kuribo
i could say you have a rusty fork prong for a tongue
and a dick to match
but i honestly dont give a fuck

if you want to suspect the one person not using bullshit
'i dont like x therefore anti town therefore scum' logic
vote me

so not no going to convince you

I don't understand the reaction here. Why not just explain your logic

[droog]

flubber is accusing me of buddying
over the 'gay is a slur' conversation
where i already explained my logic
and everyone agreed to drop the conversation

otherwise everything about
'droog is buddying'
is in fluggeb's gead

[GGG]

flubber is accusing me of buddying
over the 'gay is a slur' conversation
where i already explained my logic
and everyone agreed to drop the conversation

otherwise everything about
'droog is buddying'
is in fluggeb's gead

I understood the logic what I didn't understand is the hostile tone of it.

[Flubbernugget]

Considering he tried to emulate kuribo I think that was pretty tame.

[Flubbernugget]

@ggg on cp

Apologetic in 401.

Accusatory in 461.

Apologetic in 467.

From 491 to 512 full on sarcasm tirade.

Then apologetic in 515.

So the trick is to figure out if it's a result of ego, alignment, or some third whatever.


I can keep going but it's all confbias at this point.

[crazypianist1116]

Flubbs, what is your case on CP. I am not seeing it in your ISO?

I saw his inconsistent tone as a red flag and dropped a naked vote to see what would happen. He completely lost his shit and got way too defensive. He can make any case he wants but his intentions scream self preservation over scumhunting.

So you think my argument against you is good even if my "tone" was off (whatever that means)

[crazypianist1116]

So the trick is to figure out if it's a result of ego, alignment, or some third whatever.

It's a result of calling people out on their shit when they're throwing it, and taking nicely when people want to.

[crazypianist1116]

Meant to say talking not taking.

[Flubbernugget]

Flubbs, what is your case on CP. I am not seeing it in your ISO?

I saw his inconsistent tone as a red flag and dropped a naked vote to see what would happen. He completely lost his shit and got way too defensive. He can make any case he wants but his intentions scream self preservation over scumhunting.

So you think my argument against you is good even if my "tone" was off (whatever that means)

Your argument is that I don't have a read on you.

My vote says othewise.

[crazypianist1116]

That's not my argument.

[AWA]

Droog, would you mind compiling a post that clearly and concisely states your reasons for not liking me? At the moment, all I'm getting from you is a vague sense of dislike, and that you seem to want everyone else to construct their own reasons for why that should be rather than coming out and stating it.

[Flubbernugget]

That's not my argument.

Well your argument is based off assumptions of why I voted for you that are false so I'm at a loss.

[Flubbernugget]

CP/OC/?? scumteam

[crazypianist1116]

That's not my argument.

Well your argument is based off assumptions of why I voted for you that are false so I'm at a loss.

Nope. I thought you were voting me b/c of 362. Terribad reason to vote me so I voted you.

You then change your reasoning to this "tone" argument which is basically nonexistent.

I'm voting for you

now

because you still have a bad reason, and because you didn't give a good reason to vote originally.

[droog]

It's clear that Flubber is just trying to add chaos and confusion to the game, and I don't particularly care about the reason. That kind of posting style, behavior, and language serves only to distract from the true goal of the game, which is to eliminate the scum. Creating distractions OF ANY KIND supports the scum. That is why I am in favor of removing Flubber from the game.

This reeks of scum
Scum would be pretty happy with this "gay is a slur" nonsense
It gives them a chance to be genuine
Which scum will take for all it's worth

You're trying to justify a lynch as though flubber is making the ruckus
He's not.

willow i agree with you re: ochris
awa's post on flubber ("flubber's antitown, therefore scum") was scummy
why flames?

id thought id done so
would you like me to add to this

[Flubbernugget]

That's not my argument.

Well your argument is based off assumptions of why I voted for you that are false so I'm at a loss.

Nope. I thought you were voting me b/c of 362. Terribad reason to vote me so I voted you.

You then change your reasoning to this "tone" argument which is basically nonexistent.

I'm voting for you

now

because you still have a bad reason, and because you didn't give a good reason to vote originally.

Where's naomi

[Flubbernugget]

Did not mean to quote that

[AWA]

Oh my God.

Mod: Can you please delete the above two posts? This post is exactly the same, except with correct quotation and formatting.

-----
Except I've already addressed those points.

It's clear that Flubber is just trying to add chaos and confusion to the game, and I don't particularly care about the reason. That kind of posting style, behavior, and language serves only to distract from the true goal of the game, which is to eliminate the scum. Creating distractions OF ANY KIND supports the scum. That is why I am in favor of removing Flubber from the game.

This reeks of scum
Scum would be pretty happy with this "gay is a slur" nonsense
It gives them a chance to be genuine
Which scum will take for all it's worth

You're trying to justify a lynch as though flubber is making the ruckus
He's not.

How exactly does this "reek of scum"? I'm not happy with the "gay as slur nonsense", because as I stated, creating a controversy over something completely unrelated does nothing to actually help the town, and in fact is a detriment because it causes chaos and distraction. Which I said in the very post you quoted. Can you show me exactly how Flubber ISN'T making a ruckus? Because his insistence upon creating confusion, handwaving posts that don't necessarily conform to his own ideas, and posts such as 567 and 585 which directly demand specific players to state who they think are scum without providing any kind of context or rationalization don't help the town. The only possible reason that a player would make these kinds of moves are if they are scum or some other kind of anti-town role. Either way I am in favor of a lynch.

awa's post on flubber ("flubber's antitown, therefore scum") was scummy

I believe I address this above, (and in fact in several posts since you originally posted this), but again I fail to see how my opinion that Flubber is antitown leads to me being scum. Please show me your train of thought here.

[GuyInFreezer]

Ask and you shall receive!