Mini 1625: Redemption (Game Over)

[AWA]

istott on v/la?
bullshit
bullshit
bullshit
...

Vote: istott

[Whomping Willow]

Flail harder

[AWA]

munkir
you dont say anything
when you say something you dont do anything
seems scummy
[/b]Vote: Munkir[/b]

[AWA]

I just made several posts in droogs style. I wonder if that's enough to illustrate why it's so annoying.

[AWA]

I can keep going if you'd like.

[AWA]

One sentence posts are super easy, I see now why you guys like them so much.

[AWA]

You don't need to actually think about anything.

[AWA]

Just post post post and hope that something will catch.

[AWA]

sorry i used to much grammer in those last postd

[droog]

youre right
it would be annoying if i voted without explaining myself
switched to a new target with every post
swore with every shitfaced breath
and didnt read the thread

so an awa recap:

before this conversation:
- i scumspect you for 'flubber is antitown = flubber is scum'

after this conversation:
- i scumspect you for 'flubber is antitown = flubber is scum'
- i scumspect you for pretending you only ever said 'flubbel is antitown'
- i scumspect you for suggesting you responded to a point you actually didnt

[AWA]

God you people are so irritating to play with. I'm going to walk away and come back later. Say whatever you want, try and call up a bandwagon if you want, all I ask from everyone else is to look at the posts with an eye toward what the posts are actually saying, or in certain cases, not saying.

[Whomping Willow]

I can keep going if you'd like.

No

[Whomping Willow]

God you people are so irritating to play with. I'm going to walk away and come back later. Say whatever you want, try and call up a bandwagon if you want, all I ask from everyone else is to look at the posts with an eye toward what the posts are actually saying, or in certain cases, not saying.

If you're town you're just lynching yourself at this point.

[GGG]

Awa is town. No way to fake that type of melt down and that type of frustration only happens when your town

[Whomping Willow]

Maybe I'm confbiased but it just looks like flail to me

[GGG]

Maybe I'm confbiased but it just looks like flail to me

Hes not attacking being voted for though. Hes attacking d roog misrepping him. To me it reads frusterated town.

[droog]

I took it as
" scum annoyed at being caught for the wrong reasons"

[Naomi-Tan]

I agree on the whole Misrepresenting thing, Droog is REALLY bending AWA's Words :I and between the two on ISO I'm feeling Droog is more suspicious anyway. Im sure Droog isn't so stupid as to not understand what AWA is saying

[droog]

how am i bending awa's words

look at 648
awa told me she'd already responded to my points
i say im not sure where
she replies taht she's responded to them in 648

[Naomi-Tan]

You sure you want me to go over that...?

[Whomping Willow]

What do you think is being misrepresented by droog, Naiomi?

[Naomi-Tan]

Well, AWA has said multiple times, its pretty obvious, right now he isn't sure who is eventually scum but thinks that guy is definitely being Anti-town by causing chaos, and without anything better that'll be who he wants, which if you go back to look at their iso they are within their right.

[droog]

Flubber conveniently handwaves my entire post, without actually addressing anything in it, and then proceeds to make assertions with no backup, and THEN continues to use uncalled-for language and continues to spam post. These things may seem innocuous now, but over the course of a full game they become nonproductive at best, and anti-town at worst.

Vote: Flubbernugget

awa wants to lynch flubber because flubber's scummy

Right now, my

two highest candiatess are Flubber and Droog, Flubber for causing anti-town chaos

and Droog for not only encouraging that sort of chaos, but for pointing a finger at those who call it out. Flubber's 524 is exactly the kind of misdirection and poisoning the well that I'm talking about. Also notice the buddy-buddy with Droog; I could easily see a scumbuddy relationship there.

awa calls flubber a 'candidate' for 'causing anti-town chaos'

It's clear that Flubber is just trying to add chaos and confusion to the game

, and I don't particularly care about the reason. That kind of posting style, behavior, and language serves only to distract from the true goal of the game,

which is to eliminate the scum

. Creating distractions OF ANY KIND supports the scum. That is why I am in favor of removing Flubber from the game.

awa wants to lynch flubber because flubber's anti-town

When it comes to this game,

I see no significant difference between abetting scum by being flagrantly anti-town and true scum.

awa directly says being anti-town is the same as being scummy

awa has called flubber scummy
awa has called flubber anti-town
awa has called flubber scummy for being anti-town

there is a direct relationship between awa's dislke of flubber
and awa's desire to lynch flubber

you would have to play very careful semantics
to read awa's posts as 'i want to lynch flubber but suspect flubber is town'

[Naomi-Tan]

they become nonproductive at best, and anti-town at worst.

Anti Town, not Scummy, 544, invalid +1 Miss rep Droog

awa calls flubber a 'candidate' for 'causing anti-town chaos'

Once Again, Anti-town Not Scummy

When it comes to this game, I see no significant difference between abetting scum by being flagrantly anti-town and true scum.

Your hightlighting of that block gains you +1 Miss rep, as If I haddn't read that carfully I could been miss lead as you purposely didn't bold the reason he made the statement

When it comes to this game, I see no significant difference between abetting scum by being flagrantly anti-town and true scum.

Helping Scum as town is not good for town, Weather they are scum or not is irrivelent if they are helping scum. That is what he said,

awa directly says being anti-town is the same as being scummy

Miss rep +1

awa has called flubber scummy

Miss Rep +1

awa has called flubber scummy for being anti-town

Miss Rep +1

there is a direct relationship between awa's dislke of flubber
and awa's desire to lynch flubber

There Is a Direct relationship between Droog's Dislike of awa
and Droog's desire to Lynch Awa

+1 Miss Rep

VOTE: Droog
For Miss reping 6 times in one post, and trying to force this lynch repeatly and defending someone who has put in little to no content though the entire game and had no reason to be defended (Chainsaw Defence)

Chainsaw Defense (Tarhalindur Version)
The general form of this tell is "a player who defends another player by attacking the other player's attacker is very probably scum".
The key to identifying this tell is intent - it is possible to confuse Chainsaw Defense with a player who simply finds the attacker scummy and has no intent of defense. In general, you can be reasonably sure that this tell is involved if a) the player supposedly using Chainsaw Defense has not previously been especially critical of the player he is now attacking, and b) the player supposedly using Chainsaw Defense seems to find the player he is supposedly defending at least reasonably pro-town

[GuyInFreezer]

bump