Early stuff - Wguerts is obviously the super-derpy newbie infected with heavy othersitemeta. Looks like the kind of player who always attracts one or two opportunists. I'm guessing by the time I get to his lynchwagon I'm going to see worse votes than the ones on him at the moment, though. I'm giving Monkey himself a cautious newbie pass - no-one's harder on a really bad newbie than an OK newbie - but Nero should know better.
In post 162, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
This doesn't slide with me. Serious vote, but later you give reasons that could be applied to ANYONE. Looks more like a lotto-pick vote. Your last line admits that you don't really have a scum read on Nero, and you are waiting to see if he drops one.
VOTE: Sthar8
This is a really bad post. In the post Foxxx quotes, sthar8 is giving his reasons for
withholding his reasoning.
Foxxx represents this as being the reasoning for the vote itself.
#174 is a townpost people should have caught.
Nero's rationale in #181 actually makes sense. Well, some sense. IMHO scum are less likely to defend PLable players if they're their partners, but the point about white knighting is well taken.
FULL DISCLOSURE: THIS IS THE POINT WHERE I GOT MY ROLE PM (Read up to #192).
So there's a fairly decent DS wagon at this point, and I'm not sure what it's based on.
#221 - This is really f'in weird. Why would you make the comment in this post, and also unvote?
#225 is kinda scummy. Points out that wgeurts is playing badly, but draws no conclusions from it.
Aneninen feels off. I'll let y'all know if I figure out why.
#276 - Nero's sthar suspicion kinda feels like it's come out of nowhere. Le sigh. This is going to be another game where I spend a significant amount of time arguing with Nero, isn't it?
In post 276, Nero Cain wrote: In post 228, MonkeyMan wrote:
Newbie tells are going to come from newbies regardless of their alignment. You are impling that this makes him town and that's like a real stretch.
Nope. He explicitly wasn't saying that. He was saying that they don't make wgeurts
scum
, yet people were calling him scum over them. That's a fairly obvious and protown observation.
I think the Aneninen gut feeling is caused by him going out of his way to look town by commenting on everyone, yet very few of the 'reads' he has are actually worth posting.
In post 303, Heartless wrote:every time i look at this thread and don't see a 50 shades post
my heart breaks
twice
100 pieces of antihero heart.... /sigh
Hmmm. Filing this under 'possibly calling a buddy out for undercontribution without drawing attention to it.' Not sure I get scum off Heartless' general play, though.
Just realised ArcAngel9 replaced one of the site's most pointlessly hostile players who replaced a VI who replaced the guy who attacked my predecessor stupidly D1. This slot's gonna be fun to read.
Note 50 shades meta defense of Anen.
Massive 324 is right on the theory, though I worry may be setting up scapegoat-suspicion of monkey.
Yeah, Anen is really overexplaining here.
Read up to end p15
. Maybe she's faking that she hasn't got an idea about the past events of the game – or she doesn't even try to seem to be sensible at all. Both possibilities fits my reads that she's SK and I'd eagerly lynch her if I weren't be afraid of getting mislynched Tomorrow – regardless of her flip Heartless will tunnel me for sure.
If you would like, you may request an extension of up to 48 hours.