In post 2170, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 2166, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Oh you want me to continue? ok you've been picking low hanging fruit the entire game and focused on majority wishes instead of actually any semblance of legitimate scumhunting
My Bookitty vote wasn't totally focused on majority wishes, though. My notscience vote might have gone somewhere, if Mara didn't crash that party with her drunken antics.
Do you mean grapes? I stand by my grapes vote, now that we look who's replaced him.
Mara? I stand by that one as well, as you know.
In fact, surprise, those are still the two I think are scum. Together.
In post 2167, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p6038711
so why didn't you scumread mara when she was doing NOTHING BUT THIS the entire day 1?
Your case on mara is bad. Your entire reason for voting mara is bad. I don't agree with any of it.
your bookitty vote was barely even a vote. you sat a vote with no explanation on an unscrutinized player for 100 posts before immediately revoting, similarly without explanation
you encouraged bandwagons
The two votes you actually gave reasons for were varsoon and mara, both low hanging fruit
ok but again you avoid the question, which has nothing to do with my reasoning of voting mara! in the game i linked you, as town, state clearly a exactly applicable reason for mara being scum and yet you didn't use it here. i find that bizzare and i don't think you are actually trying to scumhunt this game!