Mini 1625: Redemption (Game Over)

[TierShift]

Why this friendly welcome?

[Flubbernugget]

And I open this page and all I see is walls :/

I can summarize.

This sentence makes you one of the worst players in mafia history.

gg

[Flubbernugget]

Why this friendly welcome?

You're obvscum for not voting AWA yet.

[TierShift]

I just won a newbie game for you, flub, shut it.

[Flubbernugget]

So you can lynch me for inactivity? No thanks

[TierShift]

Protip: don't lurk; you will then not be lynched for it.

[TierShift]

VOTE: GGG

VOTE: AWA

VOTE: Riddleton

What's up with the naked votes?

VOTE: crazypianist1116
Names too long. Townies have good short names.

Why are you going back to RVS after having voted there already?

RIDDLETON IS MY NEIGHBOR I WANTED TO SEE HOW HED REACT
NOT FUCKING QUICKWAGON THE GUY
HES A COOL GUY

Is this for real?

VOTE: droog

I think you super over-reacted with what you thought was a l-1. If you were so worried, why didn't you unvote?

He thought it was a lynch. How would you react if you found out your lolwagon on your neighbour was hammered page 2?

[TierShift]

Also, guys willow's either trolling super hard or he's scum.

Why would scum behave like that?

istott pressure votes are bad and you should feel bad.

Anyway VOTE: WompingWillow

What a nice ISO of nothing but votes.

I was gonna say same question to you but then I realised I replaced this

Already setting up the terrible player defence for all the mislynches she's going to be on.

Am I missing something in her post cause I didn't see it.

She says she is bad at mafia and gets defensive when attacked. By stating this upfront she predisposes the town to believe her later on when she is on 3 or 4 mis lynches in a row. However Naomi's response of how this info also helps the town makes it null unless she actually makes the argument later on.

Good post (you aren't getting any townreadz tho

VOTE: Whomping Willow

Currently the person I want to see lynched the most.

Oh shit this wagon is lame

Well if it is non-normal and given the fact they just talked... VOTE: Whomping Willow
Right now they are L-1

OH SHIT THIS WAGON IS LAME

You guys are boring. I'll make a proper post later

Oh my goodness he talks. And doesn't say anything except saying we're all boring. Amazing. I can imagine his next post now:

"Guys, I was just trying to get information in RVS. I did and you're clearly all scummy."

Pro-tip willow, your actions were pretty anti-town.

This post is awful and sets up for discrediting willow.

[AWA]

Just a heads up Tier, Willow is a self-acknowledged troll account, so take anything he says or does with a grain of salt.

Since droog and Flubber continue to make handwaves/vague dismissals of my posts, I'm going to continue to not be baited into discussing any more with them than is strictly necessary. Consider this a standing policy until they demonstrate that they are willing to put the time and effort into proper analysis that a person who is genuinely interested in scumhunting would.

[TierShift]

Thanks for the heads-up.

[Whomping Willow]

I'm taking this game seriously, I just felt like amusing myself at the beginning

[droog]

Nah man
Awa has you admitting you're a troll
...right?

[Whomping Willow]

I did make a sarcastic post about that tbf

[droog]

I'm taking that with a grain of salt

[Whomping Willow]

I like salt

[droog]

You're a tree

[Flubbernugget]

Look at all this fluff.

Droog/Willow/Flub scumteam.

GG.

[droog]

deadline's in 2 days
by tomorrow i'll have a proper response to awa's last wall series

[Naomi-Tan]

TierShift Please continue, your read on things is interesting and although the things from the start are nice, I would be more interested in current events given time is no longer on our side.

[TierShift]

I might get up to page 20 before DL.

I can do a skim of current events but without the context to put stuff in I'm probably gonna have skewed up views on events.

[Naomi-Tan]

I might get up to page 20 before DL.

I can do a skim of current events but without the context to put stuff in I'm probably gonna have skewed up views on events.

But the Issue with that it, if we don't have a lynch in 2 days its a no Lynch :s

[istott]

Hey guys, I've been wanting to post, but I get pulled away every time I start reading the wall posts.
I'll be back, but I have a question for AWA, Flubber, Droog, and Willow.
How would you (with out any bias) describe the case against you?

[istott]

Eg. What points have been made against you? Why have you been/are you being voted? Don't comment on the truthfulness of the points.

[TierShift]

I don't like the whomp wagon, essentially people are voting for him because he is an ass.

Yep, agreed.

Unexplained votes are pretty scummy tbh. His play style up to this point is poison to town.

Flubber, intentional crypticness is scummy.

'Look! This guy is hurting town! Let's lynch him!'
Instead of 'I scumread him' or 'I want him gone because he annoys me'

longpost

Goodpost. Gonna revisit later to see if it's reachy.

[TierShift]

Lots of over-analyzation from whomp after droog says he will unvote only after whomp contributes. Anyways, (am I forcing this anyways, or am I being casual with my anyways? Anyways...) I'm not sure why other people's posts are not relevant, but whomp's wall post is. Relevant to what exactly? Were your random troll votes relevant, or does relevance only occur when you say so?

Anyways, I maintain my stance that RVS pressure wagons are mostly useless (pressure them into answering what exactly?), and anyways, that I highly dislike lurkers, despite whether it is in any way(s) original or not. Maybe you can read it again and dislike it more whomp. Anyways, I wonder why you dislike it so much? Are you planning on lurking anytime (or anyway) soon? I plan on not letting you FYI.

Ehh stinky discredits

Ok this is most likely a stupid question but why can i see titles under peoples names they surely can't be correct can they?

If so then I think I'm seeing something I'm not suppose to see

I'm going to leave this here and see what other people think since nobody commented on it at the time. Munkir's subtitle is Townsperson. He seems inexperienced enough for this post to be a legitimate question. If he weren't town, he wouldn't have asked the question, seeing the contradiction with his own role.

That being said the rest of his posts have virtually no content and I would have had him on my leaning scum list. Not sure how to feel.

Ok you are town even though I disliked your earlier posts

I fee that istott is just asking that question to seem town and should know that mod does not provided setup info.

And to spell it out for you WW, I'm leaning scum on istott.

This guy is baaad. :/

DAYVIG: istott

Would policy lynch

The reaction looks genuine enough to me.I think you are town and the mistake earlier was genuine.

UNVOTE:

Lol fake dayvigs don't actually get genuine reactions from whatever alignment, dummy

Are you serious right now? Are you trying to tell me what I can and cannot comment on? Also, does Naomi = Whomping Willow?????

Why are you and Naomi answering questions for each other? Naomi answered questions directed toward Droog and you. You answer questions or deflect questions asked about/to Naomi. SCUMMMMYYY.

VOTE: originalchris

freakout entirely disproportionate
to the manout of pressure you received

Goodposting