guys, you need to lynch me today.
lynching me is the optimal day 1 play from my perspective.
In post 15, DeathNote wrote:Targets you in any way?
In post 70, The Will of Heaven wrote:In post 68, Bulbazak wrote:@Wisdom: He could be telling the truth, which is why we should lynch it and not leave the possibility of a cult open.
No, we shouldn't. Whoever believes him can just refrain from targetting him.
~Wis
In post 83, GGG wrote:In post 75, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 70, The Will of Heaven wrote:In post 68, Bulbazak wrote:@Wisdom: He could be telling the truth, which is why we should lynch it and not leave the possibility of a cult open.
No, we shouldn't. Whoever believes him can just refrain from targetting him.
~Wis
This is a big game with dumb people in it. It's a far bigger risk to have potentially useful PRs converted away from my alignment.
Why did you say converted away from my alignment instead of converted away from town. The way you worded it sounds like you aren't town.
In post 90, The Will of Heaven wrote:In post 66, Major Minor wrote:Eh, I guess I'll claim. Won't get any juicier than this!
In post 65, The Will of Heaven wrote:In post 63, Major Minor wrote:Wisdom, I know bastard game means lies and stuff, but this isn't one of the things I would think can be touched or altered by that.
I can't think of something that makes survivor unlikely to exist, but okay
~Wis
How about, "another survivor with a different win condition"?
I can't just win with anyone. I specifically canonly win with mafia or town. I highly doubt the moderator put in two survivors in the first place (though admittedly possible), but if he did, they would have the same win condition. And They specifically stated they can win with ANYONE, which is very different from mafia/town only.
This generally just adds to the "Skitty is prob scum" point. Although, if you win with only mafia or town, why didn't you push to lynch UT?
~Wis
In post 95, The Will of Heaven wrote:In post 70, The Will of Heaven wrote:In post 68, Bulbazak wrote:@Wisdom: He could be telling the truth, which is why we should lynch it and not leave the possibility of a cult open.
No, we shouldn't. Whoever believes him can just refrain from targetting him.
~Wis
Redirectors, town who don't want to be town, etc, third parties with impossible win conditions, etc. It's better just not to leave that option open.
~Wis
In post 208, DeathNote wrote:In post 199, The Will of Heaven wrote:In post 121, Untrod Tripod wrote:What the fuck are you dumbasses even arguing about. Fucking lynch me
SOMEONE is dumb enough to target me tonight. We do NOT need to introduce a cult to the game
What I dislike is that he's making no attempts to scumhunt. It's acceptable not to want to lynch others, not trying to find scum before he gets lynched isn't.
But that just further proves that all he cares about is being lynched, because he gains some kind of benefit from it (or just wins)
Or apathy. If I was given the role UT described, I wouldn't give two shits about this game. I would rather just die and get it over with then play something else.
In post 237, The Will of Heaven wrote:UT, you can scumhunt a bit, sexy
if this was a trap I wouldn't be going about it this way. trust me, I could get lynched as a jester/bomb if I wanted to.In post 373, The Will of Heaven wrote:Major Minor wrote:Or, he's lying and is an anti town role that wants to be lynched. Either way, lynching him seems bad.
Agreed and I don't get why people are voting him so easily. It feels like an obvious trap.
I'm a town role that converts all players who target me to a cult. despite my alignment the negative utility is too strong to keep me alive. the best advancement of my wincon, from my perspective, is my D1 lynch.In post 370, Major Minor wrote:
He's either town for this, in which case I don't want to lynch town... Or, he's lying and is an anti town role that wants to be lynched. Either way, lynching him seems bad.
a redirector wouldn't target me, they would make someone else target me.In post 408, droog wrote:wouldnt a scum redirector become cult?
In post 386, Major Minor wrote:In post 381, ZZZX wrote:In post 378, Major Minor wrote:ZZZX, if you believe UT is mafia, it's highly likely he's a role that needs to die or wants to die via lynch. I don't think lynching him is smart.
well there are 3 things:
1- It is a gambit prob
2- IF he is mafia we have to lynch him anyway at some point
3- Its a damn gambit. and if he was honest then lynching him is helpful anyway
We probably have a vigilante of some kind that could deal with him.
I will hun I've been kind of irl busy and phoneposting a lot, it was just important to me to get that info out immediatelyIn post 480, Southern Belles wrote:I wld still like SOME reads ut.