Wgeurts's vote in
740 is a thing to remember (technically naked). He's town in my opinion, though.
Alchemist,
744, Adrien's vote in that situation is a null in itself. As far as I can see he only told that it was a better idea than the other wagons. (Farside's reply is true too.) Disagree with
747 (and other posts), there may have been scums on the Siveure wagon. Sure, scums may have been away (referring to
751) but we should keep in mind the following thing: in this setup, the draft
greatly affects
the townies' general attitude to lynch someone. An early-draft mislynch is much more risky, since a town-PR may be outed or lynched!
Druuge,
756 and nearby posts, I explained my reasons, as for voting for Siveure. It's strange that you mention I was "lampshading" (
757) without mentioning the post from Formerfish (
731) – my post was actually an answer for that. Also, it seems that you're scumreading Dino/Adrien/Aneninen and leaving out Formerfish with your votes. (At this point a Druuge/Formerfish/x scumteam is possible.)
Farside,
760, I hope you'll find your answer in my post. If not, fire your question away.
Ankamius,
761, I wish you posted more about those thoughts.
I also don't understand the reactions from Wgeurts and Ankamius to Amy's
762.
Venrob,
770, WTF? That vote is bad in itself and it's even worse that you gave no reasons for it! Oh no, your
810 is even-even much worse! Oh, no-no, your next posts are somewhere in the Mariana Trench.
Farside,
772, do you think that's the best place for your vote? As for your
779, yes it seems that Ankamius is producing vague posts, I'll see what happens later. His next posts (780-ish) are vague too. I think a little meta-ing on Ankamius would be useful.
Mathdino,
774, your logic (if Siveure = town then Alchemiss or Aneninen = scum) escapes me. It was strange Yesterday too and it's just as strange now.
Flubber,
787, uhhhh, I'd say that picking up a single thing out of the thread and answering that is a scumtell, but I've seen this from town-Flubber before. So, it's only a Flubber is being Flubber tell. ^_^ (Including his later vote too.)
Formerfish,
793, what kind of rubbish explanation was that? Also,
797 is a kind of hmm-hmmm... (Formerfish/Druuge/AdrienC team? No, that's technically impossible, that would mean that scums chose 1, 2, 2. My logic is bad here.)
811 is euhhwyhh?! Pulling down a branch so as to make a fruit a low hanging one, that's what I think is happening here. And here:
822,
823. (Though he was scumreading Venrob on Day1 too.)
Ankamius,
807, that vote is ???
Mathdino,
829, that would be a WIFOM in itself, but since you were scumreading Alchemist before, that might be true. Or at least, an Alchemist/Mathdino scumpair would make no sense, at this point. Why do you think that Formerfish is town, in
873?
Alchemist,
830, I've already played with Flubber (I mentioned it in this post earlier). This is the same gameplay as a town-Flubber was.
836: some things I can tell right now about it. Check out Formerfish's next posts, from
683. And no, I'm not making this up right now. Remember what I said at the end of Day1:
As for the two scummy players,
someone was pretty familiar with schoolings
, while someone else was never to see tigers and polar bears. On the other hand, there is someone whom ik vind leuk, someone else has already got used to hearing knocks on the door and his/her name in turns. The third townread can never appear between The World and The Fool."
Certain fish-species live in schoolings, as we know. If someone is not "is", but "was" there, than that one is not a fish right now, he's a former-fish.
Druuge,
845 and nearby. As Alchemist pointed it out, calling your sudden townread on me a typo is pigeon poop! (Even if you managed to convince Alchemist that it was a typo.)
Wgeurts,
874, a half-policy vote in the middle of Day2 is bad, bad, bad!
