In post 1223, Aneninen wrote:VDA was at L–1 after my vote and before Alchemist's unvote.
Does that tell us anything? Do VDA's posts during this interval tell us anything?
I don't think anyone even realized he was at L-1. Nobody demanded a claim from the slot.
In post 1223, Aneninen wrote:VDA was at L–1 after my vote and before Alchemist's unvote.
Does that tell us anything? Do VDA's posts during this interval tell us anything?
Don't you find it strange that noone even noted (nor noticed?) it?
I hadn't announced it because I wanted to know what would happen... and this fact will be a very valuable piece of information later on, according to the forthcoming flip.
In post 1227, Aneninen wrote:Don't you find it strange that noone even noted (nor noticed?) it?
I hadn't announced it because I wanted to know what would happen... and this fact will be a very valuable piece of information later on, according to the forthcoming flip.
Name names of people you are waiting to hear from.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Victor still hasn't questioned me about anything once. Not even once. If I had a scum read on someone & they were replaced, the first thing I would do is be all over their replacement. I'd want to see if it was a case of the previous incumbent of the slot just happening to fulfill my own personal idea of what scum look like. He voted for my slot AFTER I parachuted into the game remember. It's like he already knows I'm town. What are you doing Victor?
I'm not seeing the VDA case being stronger than the Ankimus, yes his play looks bad if you view it from a certain perspective however anyone who's actually ISO'ed Ank should see that it's scum play. I'm also wondering wether ollies intentionally lurking to loose heat as a replacement so there's that as well, my vote is also a pressure one to get him speaking. Await better posts.
"...probably the worst player I have had the pleasure of playing with in the last ten years..."
"i dislike this guy immensely"
"the worst townie that ever I have ever had the misfortune to play with, by a long shot"
In post 1240, wgeurts wrote:I'm not seeing the VDA case being stronger than the Ankimus, yes his play looks bad if you view it from a certain perspective however anyone who's actually ISO'ed Ank should see that it's scum play. I'm also wondering wether ollies intentionally lurking to loose heat as a replacement so there's that as well, my vote is also a pressure one to get him speaking. Await better posts.
Lurking?? Are you even reading?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 1240, wgeurts wrote:I'm also wondering wether ollies intentionally lurking to loose heat as a replacement so there's that as well, my vote is also a pressure one to get him speaking. Await better posts.
Lurking? I await you actually reading my posts & engaging with the guy you're voting for.
In post 1237, Ollie wrote:Victor still hasn't questioned me about anything once. Not even once. If I had a scum read on someone & they were replaced, the first thing I would do is be all over their replacement. I'd want to see if it was a case of the previous incumbent of the slot just happening to fulfill my own personal idea of what scum look like. He voted for my slot AFTER I parachuted into the game remember. It's like he already knows I'm town. What are you doing Victor?
Has anyone who is voting you questioned you - even once - personally? Why focus on Victor?
There are outstanding observations about your slot, made by a least two players off the top of my head, that are critical of your slot's play. What is it about Victor that he must direct your attention to these problems in order for you to address them?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
I think i use regardless more than a valley girl uses like
Like, regardless, totally consider...
Like, rad man. I totally, for sure, get you.
Also I'm waiting for a few people to weigh in that are riding low under the radar.[/quote]
In post 1237, Ollie wrote:Victor still hasn't questioned me about anything once. Not even once. If I had a scum read on someone & they were replaced, the first thing I would do is be all over their replacement. I'd want to see if it was a case of the previous incumbent of the slot just happening to fulfill my own personal idea of what scum look like. He voted for my slot AFTER I parachuted into the game remember. It's like he already knows I'm town. What are you doing Victor?
To be brutal, I didn't think you'd read the game yet and as such asking you anything would be pointless. But if you have, then please tell me your reads and why your voting me.
In post 1240, wgeurts wrote:I'm also wondering wether ollies intentionally lurking to loose heat as a replacement so there's that as well, my vote is also a pressure one to get him speaking. Await better posts.
Lurking? I await you actually reading my posts & engaging with the guy you're voting for.
loose
lose
^common mistake that bugs the hell out of me.
Yeah, your play has barely risen beyond the odd call for one on one. More active lurking than lurking but the point stands to an extent.
And MathDino is trying panic everyone into lynching me after his case couldn't get enough votes.