In post 2075, Bulbazak wrote: In post 1476, DeathNote wrote:I agree arc is town but i also confirmed that nothing she says is worth anything.
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
You can happily leave this task to me. I always catch scum bulba. and He is scum!!
You do know that you were simply a no information kill in that sole game you've played with scum me, right?
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
He literally went after every single person who voted skitty for survival claim. There is nothing wrong in lynching survivors at any point of game which is much better than lynching a townie on day1 and moreover lynching anyone who claims as survivor on day1 will avoid scum using such claims as gambit. And Skitty didn't needed bulba defence, they had hardly three votes in their wagon. 3 votes is basically nothing in a large game and they were not anywhere close to get lynched.
I've explained this already. I believed that scum would be trying to hide on PL wagons, and it would be easier to spot scum jumping on the Skitty wagon than the UT wagon, since there was a large town motivation to lynch UT, but not Skitty. I gave up on this theory when you joined the wagon. Funny enough, you quote my responses out of order in an attempt to make it look like I was being inconsistent, rather than realizing the error of the theory.
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
And another important thing to notice was that in his post #48, he was supporting policy lynch and later he defended skitty saying that it was a policy lynch. this indeed a double mind play and only scum plays in this manner.
Actually, I said that the PL lynch on Skitty was "the worst one", indicating that I thought there was a better PL: UT.
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 109, Bulbazak wrote: In post 71, ArcAngel9 wrote: In post 68, Bulbazak wrote:@AA9:
You I'm just going to forget it being a scum claim and look at that wagon later. There's definitely scum jumping on the survivor claim.
Chill Bluba, Why are you being so defensive about votes on Scum claim. Its just 4 votes.. You should remember that it require 13 for a lynch.
Placation. She wants me off her back, even though I'm not scumreading her at this point.
In post 71, ArcAngel9 wrote:
And this whole UT cult thingy.. UT, Why are you doing this so early.
This is fake and is meant to look like she's town asking questions. However, notice how the tone doesn't feel natural.
P-edit: GGG, why aren't you voting Major then?
@Major: Not really.
This is another ridiculously scummy post from him. I had same reaction of everyone else in game for UT claim. How could he say my opinion is fake and it has come from a scum mind? I never felt like I was in pressure by him to be out of my back. Here he made statements that don't exist. How does he know what is my tone? My natural play is asking questions, I always does and he know this already yet he twisted my post to make it look like it is coming from scum mind. He have no knowledge of me being scum and there is no way he could scum read just because I voted skitty for their claim.
It's funny that you said you had the same reaction to UT when you clearly didn't. The reaction to UT was either asking a dayvig to take care of him, voting him, or refusing to vote him in fear that he was a jester. You, however, enter the game and say "UT, why do you do this so early?" which is a nonsensical and useless question that you could not have possibly hoped for UT to answer. You want to know how I can know your tone? Simple. It comes down to how you ask your question. Your question was meant to be seen, not answered, which means it was for appearances only. That's why it read so fake. And don't pull that BS about me having no knowledge of you as scum. You know better.
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 137, Bulbazak wrote:Also, I'm not going to let AA9-scum skate by just because she's overdefensive as town. Her response was all wrong, Wisdom.
This post tells that he is using my meta against me to support his scum read on me. this is exactly what I said in my post earlier. the players who know how to read me through my strengths will use it against me. And bulba did the same!!!!!!
Actually, I'm saying the exact opposite and telling Wisdom that his meta read is BS.
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 211, Bulbazak wrote:If I had to choose between which 2 survivor claims I believe, it'd be Major.
He defended skitty when they claimed survior and now he is okay lynching major but not skitty. How is major survivor claim is any different to skitty.
Actually I'm saying the opposite: That if only 1 survivor claim was accurate, I'd believe Major's over Skitty's.
You're really bad at misrepping my posts. Do you want to try again?
In post 1482, ArcAngel9 wrote:
Also see the post #329, post # 936
He repeatedly said same things over and over again. My reactions and posts are just my response and they are no different how i do things when i am town. Instead giving me benefit of doubt, he read me as scum like he knew i am scum which is not possible unless he have access to my role pm. This is another solid reason to see that he is scum and his objective was to get rid of me.
Did you just admit to being scum?
In post 1491, dramonic wrote:You don't have proof. You have opinions, perceptions, meta, gut reads perhaps, but you don't have proof.
I thought you might actually be onto something even though your ISO looks like the pilot of a cheap sitcom, but you're just talking out of your ass some more aren't you?
Then why don't you vote her?
In post 1525, mental somnic wrote:To make a TD vote more enticing
He would also make a very good policy lynch regardless
So, I think it is better for all if we lynch him
I mean,
He's scum
Even if he isn't
That's okay
This is horrible reasoning.
In post 1564, dramonic wrote:He doesn't work for the town, he's someone the scum doesn't need to kill.
It's a guy with the passive ability "you do not count against the mafia's win condition"
He has a detrimental role, and the only guy we know for sure is not gonna flip town.
He also has the passive ability of "you do not count against the town's win condition". Just saying.
In post 1574, GGG wrote: In post 93, Bulbazak wrote:The way AA9 talked to me is not coming from a town place. She tried to placate me and then went with a fake question to UT to make it look like she was town scumhunting. Nothing about that exchange was natural and coming from a town mindset.
In post 78, GGG wrote:
So if we choose not to lynch a claimed survivor who has committed to vote the largest wagon. We get to Lylo and the survivor votes the towniest person so the remaining scum jump on to win. How is this not be the outcome? And if this is the outcome how is it not better for us to lynch now.
Again, this is voting for policy reasons. If Skitty is a survivor, then her only goal is to stay alive, which means it doesn't matter who she votes.
Personally, since survivors share the wincon, I have no problem with that and would instead make sure that she votes in our favor.
If you think she's scum for the claim, then that's one thing. However, if you are trying to lynch her because she's a survivor, which it sounds like you are, then that is very scummy, since you are focusing on a useless wagon over a useful wagon on an anti-town role, or in lieu of actual scumhunting.
P-edit: @Major: I don't see the contradiction between the two roles.
I like arc angels bulba case. In addition to her case I went back and Iso'd and didn't like this, how will he ever make someone vote for him.
Solid scumposting based on BS reasoning and nitpicking. Might still be scum with AA9, but this does make me doubt my read a little.
I also realized I was confusing Skitty posting with AA9. They're both bad and filled with BS, though.
In post 1582, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote:
what are your thoughts on
1520? Kagami thinks his focus on TD feels extremely narrow; he claims the wagon on TD makes no sense, but doesn't put up a complaint with any of the people on the wagon or divine a sensible explanation for it. I don't like it for basically the same reason, and also bc the logic behind it ~again~ isn't very good - it's entirely bc of TD doing things that match one town game, with no attempt to divine motivation for any of it. on top of that there's absolutely no interest in all the meta stuff everyone else is bringing up that points to TD being scum.
I don't see how you're attacking Bro for lack of logic and narrow focus in a post that simply asks Sonic to explain his TD case more. It feels like you're really stretching to justify your Bro push.
In post 1586, Johou Tougou Shinen-Tai wrote: In post 1491, dramonic wrote:You don't have proof. You have opinions, perceptions, meta, gut reads perhaps, but you don't have proof.
I thought you might actually be onto something even though your ISO looks like the pilot of a cheap sitcom, but
you're just talking out of your ass some more aren't you?
In post 1395, TiphaineDeath wrote:@adorkable. The spam posting is terrible, the vote on me is terrible, and our original interaction was terrible, though to be fair I was only reading him as scum for the middle bit originally.
@Mentalsomnic, you sir, may take your “lack of reason” and shove it up your ass. I think the claim is fake, I think skitties posting since then has been fake, I’m not buying this reaction test BS. This is a caught scum trying to backpeddle, hard, and it needs lynched.
@Everyone, I'd have loved to see an arc angel lynch, but no one but me can see that, and I see the way the wind is turning. Johou threatened his scary fakedayvig, ya'll got cold feet, and now nachodisdumb has provided an alternative wagon for you to sheep on. Congratu-fuckin-lations. I'm going to eat this "bullet" now so that you idiots can get back to lynching actual scum if you're capable of remembering that's what skitty is.
VOTE: skitty
In post 1474, TiphaineDeath wrote:So, just for reference, when skitty flips scum we are speedlynching johou for that BS fake dayvig, right?
^ i don't like any of these posts. (bolded mine)
What don't you like?
In post 1591, shos wrote:just by reading page 60:
1. AA9 is town. no fucking way scum would invest so much power in such a short time in order to do what she did there, IMO. even me.
2. dramopnic is scum and he's with bulba. see how he keeps saying 'you ahve no proof'? proof is a word that means FACT. if I don't have the proof, then it is still a fact, but I just cannot prove it. as in, "pythagoras was right" "prove itf" against "pythagoras was wrong" "convince me".
Still scum. I don't like how he's stretching on the Dramonic point. It's like he senses that the tide is turning against Dram, and he wants to start laying the foundation to jump on him later.
I was hoping to finish catching up before I went to bed, but it looks like I'll have to leave the rest until I'm back on Monday. There will probably be over 100 pages by then...
On to page 65.
