@Anen:
In post 1373, Aneninen wrote:GreenCrayons,
1342: that wouldn't make much sense. Having a Doc is not too useful for the scums and a scum can pretend being one very easily. Also, I don't think your
1354 would be a good idea. Also, you tried to change the subject two posts later. Advocating that talkng about or reads is a bad thing in the forthcoming posts.
Everyone, why are you townreading him at all?
1. You can't fake being a doctor when a rolecop investigates you and sees that you're a roleblocker.
2. Talking about reads is fine. Do you have reads? Go for it, spill the beans. Everyone should pipe up and say whatever they want about their reads of other players. I fully support, and have supported, people airing out their suspicions of players. Don't misrepresent me, thanks.
What I said was a bad idea is not sharing one's reads, but artificially holding up today so that we can have everyone opine about who they read to be scum and town based off of Ollie being scum, and based off of Ollie being town. It is a very bad idea. It has no value. That kind of discussion is valuable
when there is an actual flip
. You know: tomorrow. And it will be based off of what Ollie flipped as.
In fact, that kind of artificial extension of the day is detrimental to the town, because it drags the game out and wears everyone down.
3. I don't see how I've changed the subject, but by all means, I'm happy to go on about how horrible an idea it is to delay a lynch just so everyone can opine about a hypothetical, when the very next game day we can instead scumhunt based on the actual game.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
