In post 410, Om of the Nom wrote:if we had to lynch purely from lurkers then id go
Zombehs>MTD>FuD>Dino>Ghostlin[/b]>Four
Even you agreed earlier that you'd rather push MTD / FuD.
In post 410, Om of the Nom wrote:if we had to lynch purely from lurkers then id go
Zombehs>MTD>FuD>Dino>Ghostlin[/b]>Four
In post 451, Om of the Nom wrote:i want to see where it leads
i also think his gun census result is extremely overdue and ika posting that reminded me of it
MTD FuD are next though
In post 368, Ghostlin wrote:In post 338, Flubbernugget wrote:I would normally say we have more time to talk but considering the "old skool" deadlines I must now debate
What exactly was stopping you before? Yes, I plucked it out of your ISO, but that's because I don't fucking remember you ever.
In post 372, Paschendale wrote:In post 370, tn5421 wrote:He's telling you that you can't have it both ways.
I'm well aware, but I'm also not aware of any actual way besides prods and replacement to get inactive players to be more active. Do you? Threats are pretty much the only way, and I don't want to decide the day's lynch based on activity rather than content.
In post 402, Om of the Nom wrote:FT how did you feel about Ghost's post about pasch?
In post 456, FourTrouble wrote:In post 402, Om of the Nom wrote:FT how did you feel about Ghost's post about pasch?
Doesn't cut either way. Bit hypocritical after he attacked my post about town blocs, but it's also not something I feel strongly about.
In post 462, Om of the Nom wrote:also ftr Fu is not using his vote at all bc right now its parked on me and he hasnt said anything about me since RVS when he actually put it on me
In post 373, FuDuzn wrote:I have missed too much to completely catch up, but I will comment on the lynch all lurkers discussion going on now.
I used to see it as a big scum tell, and as much as I disagree with it, it is a null tell at best. Those fighting back against those who want to lynch all lurkers are more likely to be scum.
Always a scum tactic of mine to defend lurkers. I will have to iso those who are doing this to see if there is something there.
In post 464, FourTrouble wrote:I'm not even defending town blocs - I was talking about using a desire to form them as a town-tell or scum-tell (especially without other evidence).
In post 466, FourTrouble wrote:I'm pretty confident Om and eye are town.
In post 468, FourTrouble wrote:Ghost might be town. I'm not sure anymore on that read. The emotion in his posts feels so fake to me, but I could be wrong, and he could just say "fuck" gratuitously for no reason all the time.