In post 587, ika wrote: In post 586, Paschendale wrote: In post 585, Om of the Nom wrote:hard defending every lynch choice is not a good way to garner townreads if thats what ur after
I just oppose the bad choices that are probably being pushed by scum. Are you preoccupied with being townread? Seems like the sort of thing that someone with no allies would be doing. Are you a faction all by yourself?
how about you be productive and tell us who the scum on the waogn is. you have yet to even answer half of the things om asked.
its not too late to join us and redeem youself
You do see that I have a vote cast, don't you? You should join me. Vote for Om. She's trying very hard to find reasons to lynch people based on anything besides an analysis of their actual play and is overly concerned with other people townreading her. We already have reason to think that there are solo factions in this game, such as an arsonist. She's playing exactly like a third party survivor should play. She's not creating actual analysis than can be used against her later and she is trying to get people onto her side.
Oh, and badgering people with pointless questions is a pretty scummy tactic, too. I'm hardly going to convince her of the case against her, and all it does it provide the opportunity for useless nitpicking. If you have questions about my case on her, by all means ask, but I'm not in the habit of entertaining nonsense from my scumreads.
Oh, and deflection. Look at the post right after yours. We have established that there are solo factions, but Om makes a joke out of it. She has no answer, just deflection.
And, of course, she can't actually make a good argument for why I should agree with her, so she resorts to threats and bullying.