Mini 1633 ~ Non-normal Mafias Mafia OVER!!!

FourTrouble · Post Post #600 (ISO) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:41 am

I'm gonna get into this Jan 6 - sorry for the absence.

CooLDoG · Post Post #601 (ISO) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:11 am

VOTE COUNT 1.10

Om of the Nom (2) ~ FuDuzn Paschendale
tn5421 (0) ~
MTD (0) ~
ika (0) ~
Ghostlin (1) ~ Flubbernugget,
Metal Sonic (1) ~ , Mathdino,

Mathdino (4) ~ ika, Om of the Nom, eyestott, Ghostlin (l-3)

Flubbernugget (0) ~
FourTrouble (0) ~
FuDuzn (1) ~ , FourTrouble
Paschendale (0) ~
eyestott (0) ~
Zombehs (2) ~ Metal Sonic, Zombehs

It takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline is: 17:00 (CST) Monday, January 19, 2015

Not Voting (2): MTD | tn5421

Still looking for a replacement. Tell your friends. Help me to help you. Finding all them replacements now...

CooLDoG · Post Post #602 (ISO) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:15 am

randomidget REPLACES METAL SONIC!!!! SWAG! only need 1 more. Next vote count will see his name replaced with sonic's remember that when voting.

tn5421 · Post Post #603 (ISO) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:16 am

It's about time we got a replacement. Gosh~

It's been a little while,

randomidget

. How do you feel about replacing into a game on day one with this many posts already made?

eyestott · Post Post #604 (ISO) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 7:27 pm

I'm here, but I dont really have anything additional to add. Welcome, randomidget!

tn5421 · Post Post #605 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:46 am

I'm having the same problem, eyestott. Hopefully having some fresh replacements will give us something new to talk about.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #606 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:50 am

if the replacements cant do the trick id suggest a lynch
id be up for lynching mathdino, zombehs, fuduzn or pasch right now tbh
i want everyone else's options too

tn5421 · Post Post #607 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 3:02 am

Pasch is too controversial to lynch right now. Any of your other proposed targets would be fine.

eyestott · Post Post #608 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 3:10 am

Zombehs is getting replaced.

mod, can you prod math?

yeah, no problem. He has declared LA for this game, so... it won't count as a strike.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #609 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 3:23 am

still doesnt change much in my mind tbh

FourTrouble · Post Post #610 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 11:48 am

TN, why is Pasch too controversial to lynch?

Paschendale · Post Post #611 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:56 pm

How about "why isn't everyone sheeping Pasch when he's obviously right?"

ika · Post Post #612 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:12 pm

In post 611, Paschendale wrote:How about "why isn't everyone sheeping Pasch when he's obviously right?"

how about "why havent you responded to ohms rebuttal yet?"

CooLDoG · Post Post #613 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:27 pm

titus replaces zombehs! sweet. we is full!

Titus · Post Post #614 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 6:12 pm

VOTE: Om

Based on this page alone, Pasch gets a sheep.

Paschendale · Post Post #615 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:22 pm

In post 612, ika wrote:
In post 611, Paschendale wrote:How about "why isn't everyone sheeping Pasch when he's obviously right?"

how about "why havent you responded to ohms rebuttal yet?"

What rebuttal? Keep mind, a rebuttal is a well founded argument, not just deflection or nonsense. Om has yet to do anything other than ask me to quote her not saying things. That's not a rebuttal.

Hey, why are you defending Om so hard? See? I can pull that one, too.

eyestott · Post Post #616 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:24 pm

In post 317, MTD wrote:
In post 314, tn5421 wrote:MTD might also be having a long holiday. From what I understand, some christmas/new year celebrations go on until the 4th-5th of January. I'm willing to look into this again at that date, assuming the situation hasn't changed.

Basically this. I thought I would have more time during the last couple days, apologies.

Now though:

V/LA through Jan 2

We need a prod on MTD. Hes about 100 hours late.

eyestott · Post Post #617 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:25 pm

In post 373, FuDuzn wrote:I have missed too much to completely catch up, but I will comment on the lynch all lurkers discussion going on now.

I used to see it as a big scum tell, and as much as I disagree with it, it is a null tell at best. Those fighting back against those who want to lynch all lurkers are more likely to be scum.

Always a scum tactic of mine to defend lurkers. I will have to iso those who are doing this to see if there is something there.

I've been waiting all year for a second post from you.

Mod: can we get prods on Fud and MTD please? We should be getting replacements, but I understand theyre scarce.

eyestott · Post Post #618 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:26 pm

In post 617, eyestott wrote:
In post 373, FuDuzn wrote:I have missed too much to completely catch up, but I will comment on the lynch all lurkers discussion going on now.

I used to see it as a big scum tell, and as much as I disagree with it, it is a null tell at best. Those fighting back against those who want to lynch all lurkers are more likely to be scum.

Always a scum tactic of mine to defend lurkers. I will have to iso those who are doing this to see if there is something there.

I've been waiting all year for a second post from you.

Mod: can we get prods on Fud and MTD please? We should be getting replacements, but I understand theyre scarce.

by second, I mean the ISOing lurker-defenders post.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #619 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:31 pm

In post 615, Paschendale wrote:
In post 612, ika wrote:
In post 611, Paschendale wrote:How about "why isn't everyone sheeping Pasch when he's obviously right?"

how about "why havent you responded to ohms rebuttal yet?"

What rebuttal? Keep mind, a rebuttal is a well founded argument, not just deflection or nonsense. Om has yet to do anything other than ask me to quote her not saying things. That's not a rebuttal.

Hey, why are you defending Om so hard? See? I can pull that one, too.

i said provide examples and you have failed to do so
as far as im concerned you are pulling things out of ur ass

Om of the Nom · Post Post #620 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:33 pm

In post 614, Titus wrote:VOTE: Om

Based on this page alone, Pasch gets a sheep.

this entrance makes me feel worse about the zombeh slot
do u guys think its possible zombeh was a 3rd party and got extremely demotivated by lack of allies bc thats a possibility im entertaining a lot right now

ika · Post Post #621 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:35 pm

wait titus is here?

anyone up for day 1 poilcy lynch on titus? if titus is smart she shoudl sheep me

ika · Post Post #622 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:50 pm

In post 615, Paschendale wrote:
In post 612, ika wrote:
In post 611, Paschendale wrote:How about "why isn't everyone sheeping Pasch when he's obviously right?"

how about "why havent you responded to ohms rebuttal yet?"

What rebuttal? Keep mind, a rebuttal is a well founded argument, not just deflection or nonsense. Om has yet to do anything other than ask me to quote her not saying things. That's not a rebuttal.

Hey, why are you defending Om so hard? See? I can pull that one, too.

so you agnkolwage that om has asked you to pull up relevant quotes. you have not.

thats why im notlistening to you. for all i know om could be right and your BS your ass off right now.

TBF im not really defending om, im just pointing out how sitty your case is on OM atm. if i wanted to defend OM i would be much more apparent about it.

Like i said, pull up quotes and let om rebuttle it then. otherwise im calling BS with you.

eyestott · Post Post #623 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:50 pm

In post 621, ika wrote:wait titus is here?

anyone up for day 1 poilcy lynch on titus? if titus is smart she shoudl sheep me

Why is Titus a good Policy Lynch?

ika · Post Post #624 (ISO) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:51 pm

In post 623, eyestott wrote:
In post 621, ika wrote:wait titus is here?

anyone up for day 1 poilcy lynch on titus? if titus is smart she shoudl sheep me

Why is Titus a good Policy Lynch?

titus is always good policy lynch. (we have a history together is the short version)