NY 179: Cute and Fluffy Mafia (Town Win)
-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
-
-
d3x Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: Burbank, CA
@Garmr- Word. I just wanted to make sure that you got that knowledge from somewhere... public.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 223, dragonspawn wrote: And as I pointed out didn't even know him on page one where you made yo. Claim and started us down this rabbit hole.
Also if tda was reading what ds said then he would of read it this way.
In post 223, dragonspawn wrote: And as I pointed out didn't even know him on page one where you made your Claim and started us down this rabbit hole.
This is referring to to to TDA accusing dragonspawn of being nero's buddy. Even through ds didn't get what tda really meant (implying that nero and ds were scum buddies together as a) Tda's reactions to ds were as if he did and then he tried to twist it to put DS in a bad spotlight. That opportunistic behavior is scummy as fuck.-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 303, TheDudeAbides wrote:No, I'm referring to how I read it when I first saw. I saw garbage and a last sentence saying "Claim and started us down this rabbit hole."
So your just ignoring his posts claiming them as garbage and picking key words in your push against him with out using them in context. Do you honestly think your going to gain any sort of traction on a wagon with such lazy and dishonest means.-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
In post 304, Garmr wrote:So your just ignoring his posts claiming them as garbage
I have not ignored his posts.
I did misread the "Claim . . . " one. That was this morning, and I should have read it more carefully later.
When he's been mistaking "buddies with" and buddying a lot of what he's said has been garbage, and when I've never said that he's done the former and he decides to accuse me of backtracking, that's garbage too.
In post 304, Garmr wrote:picking key words in your push against him with out using them in context.
When I've been talking about his posts with the intended meaning, I don't think there should be a problem.
In post 304, Garmr wrote:Do you honestly think your going to gain any sort of traction on a wagon with such lazy and dishonest means.
Well, considering the way my wagons grown, lazy seems to work, I also think that the only time I could be accused of being dishonest is about the "Claim. . . " post, and what can I say, that was a mistake.". . . for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened."
-Thompson.-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 305, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 304, Garmr wrote:So your just ignoring his posts claiming them as garbage
I have not ignored his posts.
I did misread the "Claim . . . " one. That was this morning, and I should have read it more carefully later.
When he's been mistaking "buddies with" and buddying a lot of what he's said has been garbage, and when I've never said that he's done the former and he decides to accuse me of backtracking, that's garbage too.
In post 304, Garmr wrote:picking key words in your push against him with out using them in context.
When I've been talking about his posts with the intended meaning, I don't think there should be a problem.
In post 304, Garmr wrote:Do you honestly think your going to gain any sort of traction on a wagon with such lazy and dishonest means.
Well, considering the way my wagons grown, lazy seems to work, I also think that the only time I could be accused of being dishonest is about the "Claim. . . " post, and what can I say, that was a mistake.
In post 303, TheDudeAbides wrote:No, I'm referring to how I read it when I first saw. I saw garbage and a last sentence saying "Claim and started us down this rabbit hole."
This shows you not even bothered about reading his posts in context and are picking out key words. correctly showing you only care about the lynch and not his content.
Also this is bs
In post 237, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 230, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 168, TheDudeAbides wrote:Flubber joins the list of people who don't know what and means.
I didn't realize you could read my mind so tell me why I'm scumreading you?
From the context, it seems that you thinkI misrepped DS, I'd assumed over him saying (to paraphrase) "I don't know Nero, and Nero hasn't posted, so how could I be buddies with him" and me ignoring the second part off the sentence while focussing on the first.
But now that there's this buddies-buddying thing, it could be that. If it's that though, it still means you can't read.
The debates with other people still apply even if ds didn't mean that because everyone assumed he did in the conversation that followed and that's were most of the condemning stuff lays.
In post 76, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:I'm buddies with someone I don't know
I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.
Even through he took your joke seriously, I would expect a normal townie to say "It was just a joke" but instead you tried to turn it around on him by pushing the burden of proof on him. Then you started getting vocal and omgussing everyone who voted you. When called out on it you town read the next guy who voted you. Do you know how that looks from my perspective.-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
In post 307, Garmr wrote:In post 305, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 304, Garmr wrote:So your just ignoring his posts claiming them as garbage
I have not ignored his posts.
I did misread the "Claim . . . " one. That was this morning, and I should have read it more carefully later.
When he's been mistaking "buddies with" and buddying a lot of what he's said has been garbage, and when I've never said that he's done the former and he decides to accuse me of backtracking, that's garbage too.
In post 304, Garmr wrote:picking key words in your push against him with out using them in context.
When I've been talking about his posts with the intended meaning, I don't think there should be a problem.
In post 304, Garmr wrote:Do you honestly think your going to gain any sort of traction on a wagon with such lazy and dishonest means.
Well, considering the way my wagons grown, lazy seems to work, I also think that the only time I could be accused of being dishonest is about the "Claim. . . " post, and what can I say, that was a mistake.
In post 303, TheDudeAbides wrote:No, I'm referring to how I read it when I first saw. I saw garbage and a last sentence saying "Claim and started us down this rabbit hole."
This shows you not even bothered about reading his posts in context and are picking out key words. correctly showing you only care about the lynch and not his content.
I never used that against him until he tried to argue that he wasn't pushing for my lynch. As soon as I realized that's not what he said, I backed down.
Also this is bs
In post 237, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 230, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 168, TheDudeAbides wrote:Flubber joins the list of people who don't know what and means.
I didn't realize you could read my mind so tell me why I'm scumreading you?
From the context, it seems that you thinkI misrepped DS, I'd assumed over him saying (to paraphrase) "I don't know Nero, and Nero hasn't posted, so how could I be buddies with him" and me ignoring the second part off the sentence while focussing on the first.
But now that there's this buddies-buddying thing, it could be that. If it's that though, it still means you can't read.
The debates with other people still apply even if ds didn't mean that because everyone assumed he did in the conversation that followed and that's were most of the condemning stuff lays.
Where have I tried to discount debates with other people?
I really don't see any reason for anyone to think that I said that I said DS was buddying Nero, since I didn't. Even if they did, I don't see why that is relevant.
What exactly do you think is condemning?
In post 76, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 26, dragonspawn wrote:I'm buddies with someone I don't know
I'd love to know why you said this, I mean it's a piece of information that I simply don't have access to.
Even through he took your joke seriously, I would expect a normal townie to say "It was just a joke" but instead you tried to turn it around on him by pushing the burden of proof on him. Then you started getting vocal and omgussing everyone who voted you. When called out on it you town read the next guy who voted you. Do you know how that looks from my perspective.
No, he was arguing disingenuously, and I attacked him over it, and what can I say Kid A looked townish. I can't help that.". . . for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened."
-Thompson.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
I need to say, in the neighbour QT, d3x started out by giving some out of game things that he wanted to talk about and they seemed like the sort of things that would be used to justify a lack of contributions. I attacked him for using out of game excused to preemptively justify lurking. He then said that they wouldn't afftect him this game, and then Nero acted eaither as though I should have been aware of those things in advance or that using out of game excuses isn't scummy. Either way, i don't think that it looks good for Nero, since the former is awful and out of game excuses is a pretty common scumtell. I think he was using the opportunity to buddy with d3x.". . . for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened."
-Thompson.-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 293, d3x wrote:Dude- If you legit felt that this was a request for an L-4 Claim, why did you not discuss it for 3 pages?
Towniest snark I have ever seen-
-
DrippingGoofball Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Mafia Piñata
- Posts: 40666
- Joined: December 23, 2005
- Location: Violating mith's restraining order
In post 310, TheDudeAbides wrote:I'm neighbours with Nero and d3x. d3x is probably town, so lynch Nero.
If that's not enough, look at Nero's posts.
Aw shit, neighbors again? Enough with fwcking neighbors in every fwcking game.Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.
"Metadiving DGB is like playing Roblox" - T3
"She's sort of like a quantum computer, her reads exist in multiple states at once. u have to take into account the other dimensions." - Morning Tweet-
-
The Dream Weaver Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 371
- Joined: February 23, 2014
-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
-
-
FakedBlogger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 875
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: Pula, RO
Hello people, your friendly neighborhood naked jogger here.
Right off the bat Ima have to annoy you with a humble request. I ask you all toplease, thank you.spoiler your quotes
I'm listening to the game now so you can expect me to roll up my sleeves, jk, and start scumhunting soon.What does you asking what something that doesn't have anything to do with scumhunting has to do with scumhunting have to do with scumhunting?-
-
Albert B. Rampage Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
-
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Neighbors eh? Well that explains TDAs obsession with Nero at the beginning. Problem is the assumption that since they are neighbors one or them must be scum. Last game I played with neighbors I was in a hood with pacman. Everyone assumed there had to be scum among us and there wasn't.
tell me, has Nero said anything there to indicate he is scum or are you just assuming one of you is scummy?-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
PeaceBringer Posts Blindly
- Posts Blindly
- Posts Blindly
- Posts: 5032
- Joined: August 7, 2004
- Location: minnesota
In post 272, TheDudeAbides wrote:Because people are voting me for a fucking bullshit reason, and at least two them are really good bets for scum.
I agree the reason is BS, but 99.9999 % of state reasons fall in that category and is all really posturing before folks decided on a suspect to vote for, at least that is my perspective...-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
In post 321, PeaceBringer wrote:In post 272, TheDudeAbides wrote:Because people are voting me for a fucking bullshit reason, and at least two them are really good bets for scum.
I agree the reason is BS, but 99.9999 % of state reasons fall in that category and is all really posturing before folks decided on a suspect to vote for, at least that is my perspective...
I think that's very strange.
Anyway, Garmr has lost any townie credibility.". . . for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened."
-Thompson.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 322, TheDudeAbides wrote:In post 321, PeaceBringer wrote:In post 272, TheDudeAbides wrote:Because people are voting me for a fucking bullshit reason, and at least two them are really good bets for scum.
I agree the reason is BS, but 99.9999 % of state reasons fall in that category and is all really posturing before folks decided on a suspect to vote for, at least that is my perspective...
I think that's very strange.
Anyway, Garmr has lost any townie credibility.
You have no credibility at all When I answer your questions you stop and eventually bring it up again.
@Everyone is the only neighborhood ? Because I feel this games theme may be about communication.-
-
TheDudeAbides Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 702
- Joined: October 23, 2014
- Location: with you in Rockland
In post 323, Garmr wrote:You have no credibility at all When I answer your questions you stop and eventually bring it up again.
Oh, then it should be easy for you. Quote yourself.". . . for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened."
-Thompson.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.