In post 498, LynxKuroneko wrote:Considering inactives...
Policy, Bookitty, copper, Krystal, Ghato, BRantz and FTL.
Did you forget Cata on purpose, or?
In post 498, LynxKuroneko wrote:Considering inactives...
Policy, Bookitty, copper, Krystal, Ghato, BRantz and FTL.
In post 492, BRantz wrote:I feel like there is no reason not to have Tier on the wagon right? We theoretically get another "flip" than if only people who have votes are on the wagon?
In post 466, CaskOfAmontillado wrote:In post 464, TierShift wrote:I disagree, TTH. We should try our best to make the division as uneven as possible. We ideally aim for 0 scum in the lynch wagon, but 1 is pretty decent. That means 2 scum in the remaining...what...4 players?
If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts...
My plan gives no room for scum interference. 2-1 split isn't that bad of a thing anyway since it gives guidance to the investigative roles.
In post 495, LynxKuroneko wrote:@modlady, would Tier's theoretical vote count as a vote by my ability? Totally understand if you cannot answer.
In post 518, copper223 wrote:It seems outlandish to me to fakeclaim as Kthxbye did there, it's probably his real role.
As I said I'm not a fan of clearing people based on roles, but for their motives it's a different story and Kthx seems like the kind of player that would use his perceived immunity to try and get a scumread of his lynched.
Boo can you link me the OMGUS game with him you mentioned?
In post 503, LynxKuroneko wrote:Cata makes me itch... its between Cata and FTL.
In post 518, copper223 wrote:It seems outlandish to me to fakeclaim as Kthxbye did there
In post 440, Kthxbye wrote:Yes, I did misread copper's post. Still not warm and fuzzy on him, but the push from Cata and BRantz onto me with the attempt to discredit my PR is just more scummy.
UNVOTE: copper
for now....