Mini 1633 ~ Non-normal Mafias Mafia OVER!!!

eyestott · Post Post #1000 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:48 am

I000 please.

House · Post Post #1001 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:49 am

Oh what the hey, why not...

VOTE: eyestott

If I were making the posts you've been making, I'd be totes scum.

eyestott · Post Post #1002 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:49 am

In post 997, House wrote:
In post 994, eyestott wrote:What do you think of my case? In fact, what do you think of me?

You don't want me to ISO you, because from a cursory glance I'd votepark you on 18 alone.

Why? That's a null tell from me.

eyestott · Post Post #1003 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:50 am

In post 1001, House wrote:Oh what the hey, why not...

VOTE: eyestott

If I were making the posts you've been making, I'd be totes scum.

Eh, ok.
I mean, I can be like "Nooo don't vote me I'm town" but that won't accomplish anything.

FourTrouble · Post Post #1004 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:51 am

In post 999, eyestott wrote:Titus' case on me is almost solely bout me defending Om.
Multiple times, Titus claimed to think the deadline was 2 weeks, even though people's responses, the tone of the game, and all the VCs said otherwise.
Titus claims I am awkward, over the top, that my posts don't ring true, that Something I did was funny (in a wierd way), that Om/eye have been defending eachother, that I've had no scumhunting, discussion, or thought, and that I've been in pure defense, with a bit of OMGUS.

How does any of this make Titus scum?

FourTrouble · Post Post #1005 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:53 am

In post 1001, House wrote:Oh what the hey, why not...

VOTE: eyestott

If I were making the posts you've been making, I'd be totes scum.

I need more from you about Pasch. You're avoiding voting him even though you think he's scummy. Please elaborate more.

House · Post Post #1006 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:53 am

In post 1003, eyestott wrote:
In post 1001, House wrote:Oh what the hey, why not...

VOTE: eyestott

If I were making the posts you've been making, I'd be totes scum.

Eh, ok.
I mean, I can be like "Nooo don't vote me I'm town" but that won't accomplish anything.

I would have unvoted you if you had. I'm funny like that.

Missed your shot now, though.

Interesting that you don't ask me why your posts would be so scummy if I were the one making them. It's telling how you simply accepted my logic without question.

House · Post Post #1007 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:54 am

In post 1005, FourTrouble wrote:
In post 1001, House wrote:Oh what the hey, why not...

VOTE: eyestott

If I were making the posts you've been making, I'd be totes scum.

I need more from you about Pasch. You're avoiding voting him even though you think he's scummy. Please elaborate more.

I said all I have to say about him for the time being.

eyestott · Post Post #1008 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:56 am

In post 1004, FourTrouble wrote:
In post 999, eyestott wrote:Titus' case on me is almost solely bout me defending Om.
Multiple times, Titus claimed to think the deadline was 2 weeks, even though people's responses, the tone of the game, and all the VCs said otherwise.
Titus claims I am awkward, over the top, that my posts don't ring true, that Something I did was funny (in a wierd way), that Om/eye have been defending eachother, that I've had no scumhunting, discussion, or thought, and that I've been in pure defense, with a bit of OMGUS.

How does any of this make Titus scum?

Wait, is none of this alignment indicative?
Anyways, who should I consolidate to?
Also, now the four newcomers (well, MTD effectively replaced himself) are voting me.
P.edit: no, it's not, as I accept that were different players, and do different things as town and scum.
For all I know, my town game is your scum game, and vice versa.

eyestott · Post Post #1009 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:57 am

Okay, Its 3 am. I'm not in a good enough state to talk anymore, as I'm about to fall asleep.
Night night.

eyestott · Post Post #1010 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:59 am

Actually, I'll stay up unless no one wants to talk.

Paschendale · Post Post #1011 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:07 am

Four (and apparently Titus), look at the following posts and actually read them this time. If you're still confused, then I'll have to conclude that you're just lying or are illiterate. Hint: It's spelled out clearly in the second of these posts.

782
835
896
936

Titus vs Eye looks town vs town to me. It's more emotional and looks more like a simple argument than anyone really being duplicitous.

But seriously, this wagon on me is so full of willful ignorance and OMGUS that just makes me sad.

eyestott · Post Post #1012 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:10 am

If no one agrees with my case, I'm probably wrong.
Who should I consolidate to?

House · Post Post #1013 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:11 am

In post 1011, Paschendale wrote:Four (and apparently Titus), look at the following posts and actually read them this time. If you're still confused, then I'll have to conclude that you're just lying or are illiterate. Hint: It's spelled out clearly in the second of these posts.

782
835
896
936

Titus vs Eye looks town vs town to me. It's more emotional and looks more like a simple argument than anyone really being duplicitous.

But seriously, this wagon on me is so full of willful ignorance and OMGUS that just makes me sad.

Post tags are your friend.

Randomnamechange · Post Post #1014 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 7:09 am

In post 998, House wrote:You know what would be hilarious?

I think it would be hilarious if eyestott was the arsonist and there was no fireman in this setup at all.

I reckon eye is SK.

eyestott · Post Post #1015 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 7:11 am

In post 1014, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 998, House wrote:You know what would be hilarious?

I think it would be hilarious if eyestott was the arsonist and there was no fireman in this setup at all.

I reckon eye is SK.

Why the hell would I claim a role like this? In fact, why would I have a role like this?

ika · Post Post #1016 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 8:05 am

In post 982, Titus wrote:ika as lean town

this is why im not sheeping you titus

MTD · Post Post #1017 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 10:31 am

Titus I don't like your townread on me.

FourTrouble · Post Post #1018 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:37 pm

In post 1017, MTD wrote:Titus I don't like your townread on me.

I don't like this. Weird for town to say this.

House · Post Post #1019 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:43 pm

In post 1018, FourTrouble wrote:
In post 1017, MTD wrote:Titus I don't like your townread on me.

I don't like this. Weird for town to say this.

No it's not. Poor justification is poor justification regardless of whether a person is being read as scum or town.

FourTrouble · Post Post #1020 (ISO) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:14 pm

I understand it (and I've seen town question shit like this before) but it still bothers me on a gut level.

Paschendale · Post Post #1021 (ISO) » Fri Jan 16, 2015 5:40 am

In post 1019, House wrote:No it's not. Poor justification is poor justification regardless of whether a person is being read as scum or town.

That's funny, I've been talking about poor justification being suspicious for most of the day, but there's a wagon on me for it. What's going on here?

Randomnamechange · Post Post #1022 (ISO) » Fri Jan 16, 2015 7:39 am

eyestott wrote:
In post 1014, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 998, House wrote:You know what would be hilarious?

I think it would be hilarious if eyestott was the arsonist and there was no fireman in this setup at all.

I reckon eye is SK.

Why the hell would I claim a role like this? In fact, why would I have a role like this?

I don't think you are town.
You claimed extinguisher
It is unlikely you are arson as thia would be a risky tactic.
If you were an SK then you would know it was unlikely there would be an arson, and so it would be a decent gambit.

House · Post Post #1023 (ISO) » Fri Jan 16, 2015 1:16 pm

In post 1022, Randomnamechange wrote:
eyestott wrote:
In post 1014, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 998, House wrote:You know what would be hilarious?

I think it would be hilarious if eyestott was the arsonist and there was no fireman in this setup at all.

I reckon eye is SK.

Why the hell would I claim a role like this? In fact, why would I have a role like this?

I don't think you are town.
You claimed extinguisher
It is unlikely you are arson as thia would be a risky tactic.
If you were an SK then you would know it was unlikely there would be an arson, and so it would be a decent gambit.

That really depends on the kill flavor.

If the mod uses kill flavor, his gambit would be utter shit.

MTD · Post Post #1024 (ISO) » Fri Jan 16, 2015 1:24 pm

Eyestott you still going to answer to my post?