In post 633, copper223 wrote:@Wicked
If it was too early to say for eyestott, then why wasn’t it “too early to say” for dave? The dave wagon came BEFORE the eyestott bandwagon. I don’t understand anything you said in this post beyond “game analysis and”… I don’t like this response, feels like you are selective when it comes to playing the “can’t be scum, no opposition” card.
Because the Eyestott wagon had just started rolling while Dave's had already built momentum by the time I questioned the lack of resistance, it has nothing to do with the chronological order and everything to do with the time people had to react to it.
Eyestott had four votes when you said this. He later got up to L-2, with no opposition other than me, and you still didn't say anything about it - you didn't unvote until his claim. I still think that the eyestott bandwagon had more support than the dave bandwagon. Do you disagree?
Tean Samargo wrote:I just want to say you're sort of missrepping that post. Not too surprising since I didn't put much time and detail to it. (And no it's not another editing fail).
-Faust
I've read your post several times and I don't see how it could be interpreted/treated any differently. I feel like
you're
the one misrepping.
copper223 wrote:@Wicked
If there is no cc I believe Eyes for today, in this case his read on Dodgy and my personal impression they were both scummy in the exchange, Eyes because the theory arguments he made were bad and Dodgy because he was scumreading Eyes for every second sentence, make Dodgy a good lynch for today. I do not believe they are scum together nor did I, I did find them both scummy individually.
I have trouble believing this. Dodgy was scum reading Eyes
for
the theory arguments that he made. So why is it a problem that Dodgy scum read him for every second sentence of that exchange when the entire exchange centered about those theory arguments?
@Heartless
- did you even read my vote post? how could that possibly be a town post from Tean? Cmon...
Reads;
killapenwin - still town
BBT - neutral, slight scum lean
eyestott - town
Heartless - neutral, very slight town lean - I really like the recent posts, but I'm still bothered by the original eye/dodgy/mastin proposition
davesaz - neutral, slight scum lean - still bothered by his play from earlier, willing to reconsider after the meta argument for him, but I haven't checked that for myself yet
copper - neutral, slight scum lean - mostly based on the things I question him on in this post
vettrock -
Aneninen - null - gut says town, but slight issues prevent me from fully town reading
dodgy - neutral, leaning town (upgraded to 'town' if he can explain the post(s) I just questioned him on)
Wickedestjr - obvious scum, can we lynch this guy? (AHAHAHAHA /originaljoke)
beastcharizard - null - is it too much to ask that you contribute something in a game that relies on conversation and communication of thoughts?
Tean Samargo - scum
mastin2 - neutral, slight scum lean - her early posts felt in line with how I perceive her town meta, but, again, she's probably capable of everything she's done thus far, the slight scum lean is a result of her f-bomby reaction to small-negligible things which feels a little disingenuous, has she done this as town before?
*Any read that doesn't include the words "null", "neutral", or "lean" is a strong read. I still don't have a lot of strong reads. Happy to talk about this later, but I've spent hours catching up and I'm done for tonight.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr