In post 778, vettrock wrote: In post 759, killapenwin wrote:
My vote on Eyestott, I bolded the part where I acknowledge Heartless post:
In post 516, killapenwin wrote: In post 489, davesaz wrote: In post 440, killapenwin wrote:
The discussion is going well so I am happy I didn't cause a premature lynch. I am fairly confident Eyestott is scum and
will vote for him as it has been pointed out that my vote on Tean isn't going to go anywhere.
I tribute this to him dropping off the radar by not posting much you will see in my read of his posts that I do not think he has contributed much for town.
vote: eyestott (L-1)
If you have a claim to make eyestott now is the time to do it.
If Heartless post was really on to something I wouldn't have made reference to it there.
Two things I would like to note here. First Killa moved off of the Tean wagon because it wasn't going anywhere, but seemed to stay on the Eyestott wagon until his recent move to copper) that also wasn't going anywhere. Could be just the timing of when the post were mean, but it sorta jumped out at me a bit.
The second item was for those complaining about eyestott and his early claim, clearly killa called for eyestott to make the claim, even though there was not intent to hammer.
Killa slides a bit more towards scummy.
First paragraph:
1) I'm not doing the vote counts and only check when people have a lot of votes.
2) My vote on Tean was going nowhere fast, everyone was caught up in the Dave vs Eyestott and since Tean stopped posting, everyone forgot about him.
3) I want to lynch scum so why would I quickly change my vote off someone I think is scum? If I voted someone it is because I think they are scum, if that vote isn't going to go anywhere why can't I wait a while to see if it picks up again? The only reason I would change is if I had another scummy player who is a more viable lynch.
Explain the second paragraph.
Are you seriously trying to make me look scummy for having the guy claim moments before he potentially gets lynched? I'm not the one that ran up the 5 or 6 other votes on him to put him at L-1, so fuck you for trying to put that shit solely on me, he probably wouldn't have been alive if I didn't remind him to claim.
How about you start contributing some actual reads rather than some tit bit inaccurate notes. How do you know I wouldn't have hammered eyestott given the chance? Many others thought he was pretty scummy at that time.
Speaking of intention were is your contribution to the game so far?
Have you followed through on that scum hunting you promised to do?
At the moment I mostly just seeing conservative filler posts from you.
658 is about your first attempt to actually give reads and they are mostly null, which begs the question how at over 600 posts in do you not have anything more than weak reads? Some of the 'reads' are not even justified.
696 you excuse your poor read list
the posts that follow are more 'I can't make judgements this early/D1' and yet you can say with certainty that Eyestott is town? Without even citing a reason as to why?
It is easy to criticise when you do nothing to contribute, I see your RVS vote has been stuck on dodgy since post 53 it doesn't even look like you have made much of an attempt to follow the game.
