Mini 1633 ~ Non-normal Mafias Mafia OVER!!!

[eyestott]

Yes, I'm just lacking motivation right now across all my games, and you know why.

[eyestott]

Om of the Nom (0) ~
tn5421 (0) ~
MTD (0) ~
ika (1) ~ Paschendale
Ghostlin (0) ~
randomidget (2) ~ Ghostlin, Mathdino
Mathdino (0) ~
Flubbernugget (1) ~ tn5421
FourTrouble (0) ~
House (0) ~
Paschendale (4) ~ Flubbernugget, FourTrouble, ika, Om of the Nom (L-3)
eyestott (4) ~ House, MTD, randomidget, Titus (L-3)
titus (1) ~ eyestott



I think its interesting that of the four votes on me, theyre mostly unexplained scumreads.




MTD:

Why do you think this?

Reason that stuck in mind were the recent votechanges that seemed really weird

(first going on ika which seemed like going for the easy mislynch

, then switching to titus which seems like a wagon that isn't going to happen anyway plus it was for meagre reasons) and what Titus said: The posting seems forced and a bit too eager to look good for my liking.

I am not that definitive about this but the other wagons likely to happen are much worse IMO.

Adding in MTD's dislike of my Titus case, which ill get to, this is why MTD is voting me.
Only for recent play.
So, reasons:
1: Switching to Titus when It wasn't going to happen, with bad reasons. :1

Well, to be fair, do you actually think my lynch is likely to happen? I mean, apart from Om, I dont think anyone not voting me already is scumreading me.
What was bad about my reasons? You point this out, but you didnt actually provide an example, which makes it hard to follow.

2:What Titus said: The posting seems forced and a bit too eager to look good for my liking. :2
Again, you need to provide examples. Its not hard. Where have I been forced, and what have I been a bit too eager to do? I mean, other people have been like "This lynch needs to happen" or "This needs to die", and thats eager, but I havent done that, and you havent brought up eagerness as a scumtell in anyone else. Maybe my desire to keep discussion flowing could be misconstrued as overeagerness, but I don't know, until you provide examples.

House:

What do you think of my case? In fact, what do you think of me?

You don't want me to ISO you, because from a cursory glance I'd votepark you on 18 alone.

Oh what the hey, why not...

VOTE: eyestott

If I were making the posts you've been making, I'd be totes scum.

Oh what the hey, why not...

VOTE: eyestott

If I were making the posts you've been making, I'd be totes scum.

Eh, ok.
I mean, I can be like "Nooo don't vote me I'm town" but that won't accomplish anything.

I would have unvoted you if you had. I'm funny like that.

Missed your shot now, though.

Interesting that you don't ask me why your posts would be so scummy if I were the one making them. It's telling how you simply accepted my logic without question.

House's reasons:
1: Post 18 alone is worthy of a votepark. :1
Why? What is scummy about preferring not to vote non scum reads? When was not participating in RVS a scumtell?

2: If you had said what I had said, you would be scum. :2
Okay, maybe you would. But you dont have any finished games with me either. You dont know how I play as town or as scum.

3: I accepted your logic without question. :3
Firstly, when you voted me, it was 2:49 am. I was tired, and not in my right mind.
Second, why would I question it? I mean, I havent played much with you either. I dont know how similar our play is.

I'm not really sure why midget is scumreading me, and I've already addressed Titus'.
I need a break from mafia (Not like, flake break, but just for a short time.).

[House]

House's reasons:
1: Post 18 alone is worthy of a votepark. :1
Why? What is scummy about preferring not to vote non scum reads? When was not participating in RVS a scumtell?

Not voting isn't indicative. Feeling the need to proactively defend your decision not to vote, however... well that says to me that you're scum wanting to avoid suspicion.

3: I accepted your logic without question. :3
Firstly, when you voted me, it was 2:49 am. I was tired, and not in my right mind.
Second, why would I question it? I mean, I havent played much with you either. I dont know how similar our play is.

Projecting one's own logic on another is flawed reasoning. Why

wouldn't

you question it?

[eyestott]

I actually do that in other games, both as town and as scum. I can show you, if you want.

Dude, it was 3 am. Do you really think I'm going to be running at full power

(FYI, I have Aspergers and ADHD. My medication for my ADHD starts to wear off at 7pm, and my reasoning skills just keep going down, especially with fatigue.)

? In fact, To be honest,
"Why would my posts be so scummy if you were the one making them?" Is actually a stupid question. I mean, why should your style affect my alignment?

[House]

I mean, why should your style affect my alignment?

And you should have said as much in response to my vote.

[Om of the Nom]

it has been two and a half days since my last post in this game and im still not any less angry at this game
can we just lynch pls i'll take either frontrunning wagon at this point

[eyestott]

I will consolidate to VOTE: Paschendale (L-2)
We can't afford to no lynch, given how inactive the game is getting.

[eyestott]

I mean, why should your style affect my alignment?

And you should have said as much in response to my vote.

Well, I have now, when I'm more aware.

[House]

I mean, why should your style affect my alignment?

And you should have said as much in response to my vote.

Well, I have now, when I'm more aware.

Would have meant more if you had done it before I called you out on it.

[House]

@Paschendale: Who is the scum on your wagon?

[eyestott]

I mean, why should your style affect my alignment?

And you should have said as much in response to my vote.

Well, I have now, when I'm more aware.

Would have meant more if you had done it before I called you out on it.

Yeah, well, too bad.

[House]

I mean, why should your style affect my alignment?

And you should have said as much in response to my vote.

Well, I have now, when I'm more aware.

Would have meant more if you had done it before I called you out on it.

Yeah, well, too bad.

So... when are you going to set up that hydra?

[eyestott]

You mean our hydra?

[House]

You mean our hydra?

Uh huh.

[eyestott]

I just sent you a message.
What spurred you to make 1036?
Did your opinion change in some way?

[House]

I don't like either of these wagons on D1, on reflection.

I don't want either one of them lynched D1. Pasch because he's an easy mislynch. eyestott because I want to see the kill flavors.

UNVOTE:

I'll look for somwhere else to vote in a bit.

[eyestott]

if kill flavour matters, 2 gun kills is an auto ghostlin lynch.

[House]

I just sent you a message.
What spurred you to make 1036?
Did your opinion change in some way?

Not at all. "I'm down with that" = "Fine by me".

[House]

if kill flavour matters, 2 gun kills is an auto ghostlin lynch.

So you're assuming there will be no arsonist?

[eyestott]

No.
Ghostlin claimed that there is one gun in the game.
If there are two gunshots (even if someone burns to death too), ghostlin is lying.

[House]

Right. Gunsmith claim.

[eyestott]

Nope.
Gun Sensus.

[House]

Nope.
Gun Sensus.

Census.

And it's pretty much the same thing.

[Paschendale]

@Paschendale: Who is the scum on your wagon?

Ika and Om. We've been over this already. Four seems to be town, just dumb as a box of rocks.

I'll look for somwhere else to vote in a bit.

What do you think of the case on Midget? I was planning to examine that a bit before I had to spend all my time defending myself from stupidity and scum.

[eyestott]

Midget is a good lynch that I would definitely switch to.