Your vote has been included in the total number of shos voters, but I neglected to add in your actual NAME to the wagon. I'll fix in previous votecounts in a bit, but for all future votecounts, it'll be fixed. >>> 
In post 1371, Jackel98 wrote:At least wouldn't be a wagon with scum on it, unlike Eyestott's.
In post 1399, DrippingGoofball wrote:ArcAngel is town.
In post 1417, Titus wrote:
VOTE: shos
You have castes more bandwagon sheepy votes than anyone. Something's not right here.
In post 1422, EddieFenix wrote:Why are there votes on DGB??
In post 1465, Ankamius wrote:Oh its just a pressure vote on someone who currently is VLA. So... why exactly?
In post 1476, Wisdom wrote:shos is frustrated because he was caught for what he thinks was a stupid reason
In post 1478, Pine wrote:In post 1476, Wisdom wrote:shos is frustrated because he was caught for what he thinks was a stupid reason
You know, it's funny. I was about say that the shos case doesn't really hold water, but I'm digging this.
In post 1478, Pine wrote:
In retrospect, it's dawning on me that this may be what you got me for in Duck Tales, Wisdom.
In post 1499, theelkspeaks wrote:In post 1477, BlizZard wrote:In post 1475, shos wrote:Spoiler: Guys
but that you say you left the wagon because he didn't look nervous, when TF never even posted after your vote. Meaning there was nothing to base that judgment on. You're bullshiting us.
This is actually a really good point, and makes shos look even worse. I think I'm going to make the vote-switch to shos now. The initial vote onto TF was kinda sketchy, and the justifications for backing off were worse.
VOTE: shos
In post 1504, Pine wrote:For day one in a big large, the shos wagon doesn't suck even a little
In post 1530, Toon Fighter wrote:
Making an ISO of shos makes him seem like a very good choice for lynching. Little content, naked unexplained votes, shitty reasoning when pressured, etc, etc.
In post 1549, Klingoncelt wrote:
Post 821:
"The thing with Wisdom is he saw my extremely over-the-top well-behaved side. He thought I was getting kind of aggro here. I showed him what aggro's really like.
Why are you saying "dumb"?
I already said all there is to say. ISO my posts, ignore thefake ragepost."
Yes she did.
In post 1550, Titus wrote:He'll get there. Bulbazak is pretty smart on here.
In post 1578, Pirate Ika wrote:
bulb: how do you know there are no QTs? last gaem we had it so your either saying you have a PT ir that your just lying have have a QT yourself
In post 1578, Pirate Ika wrote:
titus being cop: doesnt change anything have you ever considered it to be rolecop as well? or that its just a scum cop?
In post 1578, Pirate Ika wrote:
muffin: build a town case on him cus im not the only who doesnt see it
In post 1578, Pirate Ika wrote:
MS thing: i also know that eddie was soft CC MS as well you knwo. but i was immune to him so i had not fear at that time. it doesnt change anything in reality
In post 1580, Fluminator wrote:I would expect town to be a little less upset about being bandwagoned like this.
In post 1601, Nobody Special wrote:In post 1562, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 982, EddieFenix wrote:Giving Bulba time to catch up before I put the coals to him seeing as how he's only on page 22.
Okay, I know I said I was going to give you space, but this is incredibly scummy. You know what my schedule looks like. You know that I go LA starting from around 8pm on Friday, when I start preparing for my First Impressions stream, until first thing Monday. You know that weekends are incredibly busy for me. Heck, you know what my schedule looks like on Saturday, with all day D&D, because you're freaking there, Eddie! You also know that I like to perform checks and updates on Sunday, and that it takes up most of my day. So for you to come into this thread and say that you don't understand how I'm on page freaking 22 on a game that gained 20 pages over the weekend is incredibly scummy and only meant to make you look good and to discredit me. You better push through a lynch quickly, Eddie, and then kill me during the night, because when I get back, I'm going to make sure that you hang.
In post 993, Pirate Ika wrote:I want to wait until bulba fully catches up before weighing it with our own.
Stop waiting. Eddie's conf. scum. Lynch him.
Okay.
I'm not entirely sure how I feel about this, so.
It is apparent that there are some RL circumstances affecting this interaction, with regard to availability, scheduling, etc.
But the thing is, your answer to Eddie here is a vast overreaction to my reading of Eddie's comment. He said he was giving you time to catch up. Then you promptly jump all over him for...... giving you time to catch up?
I just don't get it.
My current read given this interaction is Bulb, scum; Eddie, town.
In post 1624, Fluminator wrote:She's purposely acting mysterious. Hinting she has a great role and all that and ready to strike when the time comes. It's painting a target on herself.
In post 1636, alivechihiro wrote:In post 1627, PeregrineV wrote:In post 1614, Nobody Special wrote:He's saying that while shos may look scummynow,shos has thepotentialto scumhunt effectively later.
Fixed it.
In post 1629, shos wrote:That does give you incentive to keep me alive for a few days, though
:/
But you could sayanyonehas the potential to scumhunt effectively "later".
In post 1639, EddieFenix wrote:
@Bulb I WANT you to catch up so we can duel for once seeing as you finally have some experience under your belt, ya git. So take your tiiiiiiiime. Catch up and read things thru. Cause when we dance this time, it's gonna be a blood bath of pages. And if I get NK'd before then, someone better take my stead and gun your scummy ass down. Cause you've become public scum number 1 to me.
In post 1664, PeregrineV wrote:In post 1662, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 1660, PeregrineV wrote:I did that for Toon and Klingon. You do it and tell me if you get town or scum for them.
I have Klingoncelt as town, and Toonfighter as null. Do we see towntells for TF?
914 and 930 and 1259, mostly.
In post 1665, Wisdom wrote:In post 1663, Bulbazak wrote:Why not?
both were unexplained and out of nowhere
In post 1674, PeregrineV wrote:Not keen on Eddie from something early game, and the fact that Bulba is voting him.
In post 1712, theelkspeaks wrote:Klingon feels a little less scummy to me than earlier, but I still have some suspicion there.
In post 1713, BlizZard wrote:In post 1710, eyestott wrote:Hey, Blizzard, I'm having trouble reading you.
So, what do you think your best scumhunting of today has been?
I think the shos wagon rising is a good indication to what I think our best scumhunting today has been.
~.Zar
In post 1732, Frightened inmate number3 wrote:actually not bullshit
we have role related reasons why shos is near confirmed town
so back the fuck up
onto toon
In post 1735, Frightened inmate number3 wrote:but bulba could still be mafia
we think he may be using our joint shos knowledge to get towncred
In post 1742, Titus wrote:Ok Bulba, I townread you really hard so I am going to try here. What am I missing on shos? Is shos town solely because people understand a wagon I pushed?
In post 1744, Bulbazak wrote:In post 1742, Titus wrote:Ok Bulba, I townread you really hard so I am going to try here. What am I missing on shos? Is shos town solely because people understand a wagon I pushed?
FIN3 just revealed that she shares a PT with Shos, Muffin, and myself, and everyone is unanimous that Shos is town. Read between the lines.
In post 1711, BlizZard wrote:In post 1581, alivechihiro wrote:Oh yeah, UNVOTE: for now. I'm not seeing a klingon wagon in the near future.
The wording here seems to imply you still suspect them though. Do you?
What are your other reads?
~.Zar
In post 1699, ProHawk wrote:In post 1689, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 1688, ProHawk wrote:Scum could easily have a fruit vendor role, especially in this game.
So could Town.
Try doing some genuine scumhunting, kaythanx.
You think I am scum reading you because you claimed fruit vendor? Try again. Kaythanx.
In post 1745, Pirate Ika wrote:You know i'm expecting a fullclaim now from you 4
