In post 2583, Pirate Ika wrote:with all the nks, i would almost be more inclined to say "lets random lynch and hope NK work in our favor"
In post 2594, Awesome wrote:OKAY another thing doesn't make sense.
titus thinks that shos has the same role as her right? titus gets a guilty result on shos last night right? Titus votes her guilty result but claims it might not be accurate because insanity. then she picks up a crumb which makes her think her guilty result has the same role as she does and she switches from her (maybe insane result) to the supposed guilty result of the person she investigated and doesn't know is guilty or innocent.
Am I smoking crack here? Like this makes no sense to me.
I mean I fully admit if someone investigates me, I'll investigate as serial killer so sure, but the actions of these two make no sense whatsoever.
They make perfect sense to me.
In post 2596, Wisdom wrote:What i gather is we should totally ignore cop results and lynch based on scumhunting.
Also awesome is ridiculously obvtown
Just so you know, I'm not inclined to trust anything you say, atm.
In post 2617, Pirate Ika wrote:
I am also wondering if the hood had a guilty why did fin voted dgb out the gate
Maybe because Shos hadn't posted in the hood yet. Results tend to not be given immediately.
In post 2624, Pirate Ika wrote: In post 2564, shos wrote:Well, shit. I slipped cop lol
We planned that soneone else from the hood claims cop with my results.
..
So I guess its safe to answer niw
Me and titus have the same role pm, it appears. He said something that confirmed him to me, so i said something back to confirm myself to him. So he backs off and jumps on you. Makes sense now?
was the other person from the hood fin?
cos I donnae think she got the memo she voted dgb out the gate which weakens your result.
Actually, it was Muffin.
In post 2632, Awesome wrote:We were talking about what we appear as. Shos was saying appearing as Sk would appear as town.
Don't be daft.
Where does he say that?
In post 2646, Titus wrote:We are. The hood should verify Shos is a cop of questionable sanity.
When Shos claimed cop, I asked if he was told if he was sane. He said that he was not, but that he believed it to be the case, hence why he didn't investigate Ank like I originally suggested.
This game gained about 60 pages in 4 days. I don't think we have to worry about town apathy.
You did? We must be playing two entirely different games then, because the possibility of you being a miller never came up at all during d1. If you were super obvious, as you claim, then there would not have been the clamoring to have you investigated.
In post 2667, Pirate Ika wrote: In post 2664, Awesome wrote:We are NOT independent non malicious third party if that is what you are asking. We are town.
I really love the "non malicious" part of this post.
Yeah. It really feels tacked on and unnecessary.
Why?
Also compulsive, which she added on later. You can't forget that. I anticipate that she'll also be bulletproof by the time I reach page 160.
In post 2700, BlizZard wrote:but their entry posts are a vote on shos and wanting to know what shos is (it's consistent with expecting something that did not happen).
If I was a vig and my target didn't die, my first thought would be protective role not "OMG he must be scum! We must flip and find out why he didn't die!". That's simply not a town thought process.
In post 2700, BlizZard wrote:
7) If shos planted that crumb he pointed at in 163 why would he go on to say then he had planned someone else in the hood to claim COP for him?
Actually, Muffin and I came up with that idea. We wanted to keep scum off of Shos's trail for as long as possible.
No, but when asked if his sanity was in his role PM, he said no.
Why do you only have protected by scum here and entirely discount that he might have been protected by town? The second is a far higher possibility, and it should be one of the first ones that comes to mind, so why are you ignoring it?
On to page 110.
