In post 665, BlueBloodedToffee wrote: In post 643, TierShift wrote:BBT, I don't understand your push on me. I really don't. What is the scum motivation you see in my play?
OK,
76 and
498 are posts that just feel off. 76 feels like you're talking to Esp like you know he is town (potential slip?) and 498 is the cog dis with Micc that doesn't make sense, especially with it being in the same post.
I have talked about this. I'll talk about it one last time. If you don't understand it, it is fine and you can hold it against me, but don't pretend like I'm not trying to work with you.
In 76, I'm against general flavourclaiming. As I
think
espe is town, I give him information only he can work with. I don't know why you think I
know
he's town. It's weird to assume that, so if you're going to hold on to this point, you need to explain.
In 498, I show my desire to work with scumreads. Something I'm asking from you right now. I still don't understand your issue with that. Being able to work with scumreads is what makes a good player.
Your flinging of mud at the KBW wagon. You highlighted the votes but didn't actually pursue it any further. The scum motivation is that you highlight the votes for other people to see and hope that someone begins a push from it. This allows you to join the wagon at a later date (because you claim to not like the votes whilst doing nothing about it) and not be the main driving force behind a potential town lynch. This means you come under much less scrutiny the day after.
This point is next to not really being a scumtell, simply untrue. I had been voting seohyun for his weak attack of kbw and later voted LMS for the same reason. I did in fact pursue the ones voting kbw.
Also, you said at the time that you were null-reading KBW. When I challenged you on this at a later date, you said you were opposed to the KBW wagon. Can you show me where you were opposed to the KBW wagon? Because I don't see it.
Exactly here
and here
In post 458, TierShift wrote:So, your top scumread is someone who has fluffed a lot. That seems like a shitty reason to scumread a player, let alone be your strongest scumread.
and if that weren't enough, here
In post 477, TierShift wrote:Can we get some more MS votes? Kbw votes for not contributing are totally out of fashion!
You didn't respond to the post below either;
explained, he was a townread.
2. No, you wasn't against the KBW wagon. In fact, if you was, then why didn't you pursue any of the votes on the wagon? Secondly, if you were against it, why did you say this;
In post 332, TierShift wrote:
In post 143, Bert wrote:KBW has been null unless you think his "playing around rather than getting serious" is scummy (which i don't this early in the game)
My thoughts.
Uh, that doesn't contradict? kbw is a nullread who has a very shitty wagon on himself. He's since been downgrading to nullscum (exactly what bert says in his post, btw!) for active lurking but that doesn't make the earlier wagon on him any less shitty.