Yes. INTENTIONALLY suboptimal play is scum play. Period. Town will not do things on purpose that actually hurt their chances on winning, and that is absolutely what you are doing. You either did something as town that I know you are smarter than to do, or you are scum. Like if a newbie did it, not as much of an issue because you have to assume they don't know better. You doing it, issue.
Are you saying you'll let people get away with scummy shit because of their past? Are you saying you're OK with his recklessness because it's a thing with him? That you're fine with him potentially fucking things up for the town because it's how he rolls?
I am saying that there are people on this site who will make bad moves on purpose because they don't know any better or because they prefer to play loose feeling it helps keep people off balance and every one in a while it completely nukes the town if they are town. Normally these are the types of players I also don't mind lynching because they are borderline liabilities. I know UT is more of a loose player but not as much of a liability to be playing as he is, so I think its a good chance he is scum.
Putting me at L-1 and immediately trying to pawn off any accidental hammer on others (and I am town) which shows him willfully playing suboptimal as he knows better than that
The fact that he tried to shift blame makes the assumption that I would flip town as only blame would occur if I flipped town
Him oversimplifying my saying he is playing suboptimal in order to not respond to the points I am making
Requesting hammer without a claim
Requesting a hammer with two votes on the wagon being RVS votes and one other not have posted any content
He is calling people scum for unvoting to wait to hear more content from aforementioned people