Ok, I re-read the entire thread last night, and I think I have something. I believe I found where DDD and Bitmap are having a "scum" conversation. I apologize for the wall post in advance, but I feel this needs to be in one post to work.
In post 63, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote: In post 35, Bitmap wrote: In post 34, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Can we just assume I said everything Bitmap did? Read a post, start typing a response, see Bitmap made the response I was going to. See the next post, start typing a response, Bitmap did it. It's very rude.
I'm very sorry. I can't help it when I'm town. :/
Also, which posts were you planning on responding to?
#13, #23; let's just go with every post that ends in the number 3 for good measure.
In post 36, Bitmap wrote:@DDD:
Quick question that I would like to be answered, when you play forum mafia, do you read everything that has been posted and then make a post or read a post at a time and respond if need be per post?
I don't think I have a definitive style in that regard; like this post is being written after reading these two posts and the rest of page 2 but not page 3. Sometimes I'll read everything, sometimes I'll snap reply.
UNVOTE: Bitmap
This conversation was one of the first things that made me nervous about this pair. It was random, and I didn't understand the point. However, I believe it was used to cover up day talk on strategy. DDD makes hardcore emphasis to the number 3 in the above post. I looked, and I am the third player listed in the first post by the moderator. I feel its DDD telling Bitmap to go after me for the lynch.
In post 71, Bitmap wrote: In post 63, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
In post 36, Bitmap wrote:@DDD:
Quick question that I would like to be answered, when you play forum mafia, do you read everything that has been posted and then make a post or read a post at a time and respond if need be per post?
I don't think I have a definitive style in that regard; like this post is being written after reading these two posts and the rest of page 2 but not page 3. Sometimes I'll read everything, sometimes I'll snap reply.
Lame. I was trying to do a reaction test and this didn't tell me squat. But I'm still leaning town on you.
I believe this is continued "scum strategy." Bitmap is telling DDD that he didn't pick up the secret text??
Bitmap puts a hollow attempt to start a bandwagon on me, just as requested.
In post 255, Bitmap wrote:Hi, I'm back.
My case on Diego was his really bad reasoning for his L-1 vote on him.
In post 199, Diego1487 wrote:If you think we're that gullible, you deserve this.
If you are that naive of a scum player, you deserve this.
If you are that weak of a town player, you deserve this.
This was a really bad reason for an L-1 vote. If town, you would of said "You're scum" in some sort of fashion.
Also, letters townbled a bit by the way he reacted on his L-1 vote. He mentioned who to go after after getting lynched with reasons which irks me as town.
Also, Diego has an OMGUS reason on me.
When pressed, Bitmap gives poor reason for his vote on me. He ranted earlier in post
50 that town players don't have to mince words, so saying that my wording is scum doesn't add up. His second reason has nothing to do with me, only deals with letters' reaction. His third reason doesn't even make sense, it was just thrown in there to add "more proof" to his reasoning.
I know everyone doesn't like looking for scum pairs, but I wasn't looking for this when I found it. If DDD and Bitmap weren't veteran players, I would just put this off as a coincidence. However, I believe that they feel they can pull this off in a Newbie game without getting caught.