Nobody Special - 1 (Impossibear)
Not Voting - 7 (theelkspeaks, guille2015, Pirate Ika, Nobody Special, Awesome, PeregrineV, Ankamius)
7 to lynch.
BlizZard to be lynched.
In post 5117, Jingle wrote:In post 5078, BlizZard wrote:In post 5074, Ankamius wrote:What's the whole list of your results?
N1: NS - Town
N2: Shos - Not Town
N3: Impossibear - Not Town
Soooo....
You're insane then? Sweet.
VOTE: NS
In post 4867, BlizZard wrote:In post 4863, Pirate Ika wrote:In post 4862, BlizZard wrote:FFS, Wisdom is town!
are you willing to take his place on being lynched instead cus thats what it kinda is atm....
Go ahead. If you're not going to listen to us you might as well lynch us.
In post 4880, BlizZard wrote:And LOL at the Godfather theories. We've reached a point where people are actually pushing to lynch a player who's been confirmed as town by one cop, who's confirmed to be sane, and defending a player who has been confirmed as scum by two cops, also sane. What the fuck is wrong with you people?
In post 5129, Pirate Ika wrote:okay so compiling my notes...
tammy who were you jked by on n1 again?
In post 5011, Frightened inmate number3 wrote:19 Town
2 Communists (Zar, ???)
2 Dictators (Jackel98, Prohawk)
2 Fascists (Toon Fighter, Wisdom)
2 Hippies (Fluminator, Klingoncelt)
i think this is the setup, taking into account the discussed factions, prohawk's behavior end of day 2, and decreasing number of nightkills
so 19 town to 8 scum, with 4 scumkills per night
reasonable?
In post 5096, Titus wrote:Blizzard, why would your results be messed with and not mine?
In order for your belief to be accurate, scum had to fuck w shos results and PV results and I would have to be naive.
That is very unlikely.
In post 5099, Muffin wrote:Anyone who was townreading Wisdom and buying his "I'm so obvtown" horseshit needs to apologize for that incredibly frustrating day yesterday. I cannotbelieveyou all got cajoled into lynching shos.
We were all fucking telling you he was town.
I don't buy Blizzard's excuses one iota.
VOTE: blizzard
In post 5101, Titus wrote:Fair enough. You got the idea. I am not a fan of those two claiming miller. What can I do about it though? I am running out of people to check.
4 miller claims, myself, PV, Blizzard (likely lynch)
That leaves me guille NS Bear theelkspeaks and ika... taking suggestions at this point
In post 5094, BlizZard wrote:By that logic, we shouldn't even bother using our role, because some scumbag can mess with our results.
Having a gun does not equal to being a miller...
What don't you believe?
In post 5128, Muffin wrote:^ for the record that player who Blizzard was defending flipped scum.
And the player that is "confirmed" scum flipped town.
In post 5132, guille2015 wrote:
Blizzard is scum no doubt about it. But The reason is not the result itself, but rather the way he reacted to Shos claim. I even asked him if he thought that Shos was a cop, and he said that he did seemed to have access to a cop result and if I recall correctly he talked at some other point of his result to be tampered with or faked, Yet he considered him scum. I found that weird and would have voted for him today even if Shos flipped scum.
In post 4880, BlizZard wrote:And LOL at the Godfather theories. We've reached a point where people are actually pushing to lynch a player who's been confirmed as town by one cop, who's confirmed to be sane, and defending a player who has been confirmed as scum by two cops, also sane. What the fuck is wrong with you people?
In post 5135, Awesome wrote:In post 5094, BlizZard wrote:By that logic, we shouldn't even bother using our role, because some scumbag can mess with our results.
Having a gun does not equal to being a miller...
What don't you believe?
The whole thing?
I'm not saying that you shouldn't use your role, it's the belief in the results that concern me. You say you're the sane cop who got a guilty on shos night two, but he flipped town. You then are placing absolute faith in you NS and impossibear results. This doesn't make sense to me.
I can't see a reason for shos to have been messed with night two. Titus had already investigated shos and come back with a guilty, so why did you investigate him night two? And since he had already been investigated and there were no other signs of a cop, so why mess with shos? The only thing I can think of would lead to you getting an innocent read. And I guess framer right? But he had already been investigated.
He also has a guilty on you, and since he got a guilty on us, he's more than likely sane. And you can't say that he got a guilty on you because you're a cop who has a gun because Titus got a guilty (read innocent since insane) on shos and he was a cop.
In post 5139, Awesome wrote:In post 4880, BlizZard wrote:And LOL at the Godfather theories. We've reached a point where people are actually pushing to lynch a player who's been confirmed as town by one cop, who's confirmed to be sane, and defending a player who has been confirmed as scum by two cops, also sane. What the fuck is wrong with you people?
What was this in reference to?
We are certain that there are at least one town doc and one scum doc. Who knows how many protective roles are out there.In post 5136, Awesome wrote:Guille - there might be more than two on each team, they could be asymmetrical too, but there is no denying that there are fewer night kills.
In post 5136, Awesome wrote:Oh also, when the second dictator was gone, wisdom mentioned that that team was likely wiped out, which suggests his team was two. First thought anyway.
In post 5140, BlizZard wrote:Shos was more than likely paranoid.
In post 5147, Titus wrote:I would prefer an ika vig though. If he's scum with two extra lives, that's dead meat to us.