In post 572, onion wrote:quasi-confirmed townie
the only confirmation you ever get is when the mod says "this player is town/scum"
get the rest of it out of your head because it doesn't exist
In post 572, onion wrote:quasi-confirmed townie
In post 570, Equinox wrote:ChannelDelibird's post 567 is the most convincing for me re: LlamaFluff, though, so my vote might go there.
In post 577, TellTaleHeart wrote:I'm screaming like a maniac about the prawn wagon and CDB's off-the-cuff, vague comment is really what's doing it for you?!
>:(
In post 588, TellTaleHeart wrote:I don't buy it.
In post 590, TellTaleHeart wrote:That's fine because I don't think he would.
In post 594, Untrod Tripod wrote:aye aye capn
In post 595, LlamaFluff wrote:You just going to skirt everything really going on here? And you seriously think there are three scum?
from da wiki wrote:The Tracker is an informative role that can target a player at Night and learn who, if anybody, that player targeted the same night (but not the action the player performed). If that player did not target anyone, the Tracker receives a result of "did not target anyone" or similar.
Trackers have been seen as each alignment.
This version of Tracker, and only this version of Tracker, is considered Normal on mafiascum.net.
In post 597, onion wrote:from what i can understand of the Llamaspeek, his plan was to find someone who was very probably VT and track them N1, then roleclaim D2, revealing 2 town-aligned people without active PRs. Isn't that bad for town for the same reasons me and derangement were discussing? Revealing VTs to the scum lets them know who not to target. it seems like a bad plan to me.