In post 421, Flubbernugget wrote:Oh and I guess you buddied me so there's that
I did?
Both Witness Protection and Titus keep (purposely?) missing my questions and I'm really mad about that since I don't have a superb read on either.
Talk to me!
In post 421, Flubbernugget wrote:Oh and I guess you buddied me so there's that
In post 429, Titus wrote:VOTE: Brantz
Why are you giving me towncred for the Tier wagon before he flipped?
In post 447, BRantz wrote:@Axle: Post 4 is your first request for meta information. Then you self meta (in response to a question about it) in 28.
WAT.I am not sure what you did in 144 but remember feeling it was meta related, feel free to correct me on this.
You request meta from farside again in 202.
In post 93, farside22 wrote:I voted for you because you are not typically a Chatty Cathy asking lots of questions.
In post 444, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 307, BRantz wrote:@Axle: Why don't you start playing this game instead ofcontinuallyasking people to give you meta on everything?
In post 427, BRantz wrote:
AxleGreaser: Axle posts a ton of walls, but seems to focus too much on meta and not enough on what is going on in the game (though this has gotten better in the last few pages).
I am having trouble believing this post comes from you reading the thread and trying to understand it.
In post 451, TierShift wrote:Sera wagon forms too fast to be scum
In post 458, TierShift wrote:I don't like how there is the 'maybe we'll vote sera' sentiment but no one actually does it while there's a bigger wagon. The wagon that forms now is huge and rapid and has a few players on it that look like they are reeeaaaallly happy to let go off the leading wagon (brantz), especially brantz himself looks very opportunistic in that regard.
I base my vote solely off his latest readslist, axle. Go reread his stances before the wagons changed and after they changed. They are extremely self-preserving.
In post 441, Witness Protection wrote:I fear if Sera gets replaced, we may lose a chance to kill a scum. Remember DP's play in Walrus? I see big similarities.
Different game, different players. But play that looks very much the same.
In post 449, T S O wrote:Sera seems like the town counterwagon to BRantz, but don't mind me. Continue the lurker policy lynch.
In post 463, TierShift wrote:What do you think of my point on brantz being self-preserving?
In post 441, Witness Protection wrote:I fear if Sera gets replaced, we may lose a chance to kill a scum. Remember DP's play in Walrus? I see big similarities.
Different game, different players. But play that looks very much the same.
In post 450, TierShift wrote:In post 421, Flubbernugget wrote:Oh and I guess you buddied me so there's that
I did?
Both Witness Protection and Titus keep (purposely?) missing my questions and I'm really mad about that since I don't have a superb read on either.
Talk to me!
In post 466, TierShift wrote:I don't know, lurkers are null.
Major problem is that a sera townflip will tell us absolutely nothing in regards of associative tells. I have not seen any convincing evidence sera is scum other than powerlurking which is a meh tell. I don't want to go into tomorrow with a deadline town wagon. I'd much rather have a more probable scumflip in brantz and a useful day 2 even if he flips town.
Town and scum are self-preserving in different ways. Town don't just flip their read on someone because they aren't the big wagon anymore, scum do. Joining the big wagon is something town do at times, but it's a much more consistent scumtell than lurking.