In post 101, Cheetory6 wrote:Does randomidget strike you as a hard to lynch player?
In post 65, kelbris wrote:If I seem a bit too cautious I apologize, I would also like to claim VT, a bit of advice btw, in my other 2 town games, I wound up ultimately claiming VT
In post 96, havingfitz wrote:Ok...so I'm good with my randomidget vote.
In post 97, Cheetory6 wrote:I'm having a hard time getting a read on anything in this game because when I read back I feel like a fucking tool.
The game had arguably stalled, thus given that he wasn't at least voting me while just kind of throwing some weak questions at me just felt like it was doing nothing to push the game forward and hence it was effectively 'useless'. Doesn't mean I don't think what he did had thought behind it or that he isn't thinking critically. I don't think it's arguable that he's played a smarter game than I have so far, but whether he's usefully progressing the game by sitting on 1-2 questions while not trying to push a vote this early is debatable.havingfitz wrote:Question for you Cheeto - in the post you vote me you accuse Slandaar of useless posts that he doesn't back up and then say you want to avoid his quicklynch because he's "at least critically thinking in a game that's pretty devoid of content so far." How does that accusation towards Slandaar fit with your reason for taking your vote off him? It's seems like you are contradicting yourself wrt your views on Slandaar.
Trouble with people like random/kelbris is that it's easy to scumread their general metatells. Even worse is that it's easy for scum to call them out on things and look like they're being productive/progressing the gamestate. I don't think it makes them more or less likely to be scum, but I wasn't sure if the course of action you were taking is that of someone who's genuinely trying to sort someone and I wanted to prod it more.havingfitz wrote:Why do you Cheeto, a self-confessed "dumbfuck," think randomidget and kelbis are easy targets and does that make them more or less likely to be scum? I'm more than happy trying to weed out the easy to find scum first. If there are difficult to find scum...deeper the game goes, more likely they stand out.
In post 108, massive wrote:It would be a fascinating study to run, you know -- create ten new accounts, have them claim vanilla townie in their first three posts regardless of role, and see how long they survive based solely on the newbie goodwill.
In post 107, Cheetory6 wrote:The game had arguably stalled, thus given that he wasn't at least voting me while just kind of throwing some weak questions at me just felt like it was doing nothing to push the game forward and hence it was effectively 'useless'. Doesn't mean I don't think what he did had thought behind it or that he isn't thinking critically. I don't think it's arguable that he's played a smarter game than I have so far, but whether he's usefully progressing the game by sitting on 1-2 questions while not trying to push a vote this early is debatable.
In post 97, Cheetory6 wrote:basically sitting on a few really useless questions at me and kelbris which aren't going anywhere without actually voting for either of us.
In post 97, Cheetory6 wrote:someone who's at least critically thinking
In post 107, Cheetory6 wrote:Trouble with people like random/kelbris is that it's easy to scumread their general metatells.
In post 107, Cheetory6 wrote:What exactly is the apparent scum motivation behind what random is doing right now?
In post 106, havingfitz wrote:Why do you Cheeto,a self-confessed "dumbfuck,"think randomidget and kelbis are easy targets
In post 106, havingfitz wrote:how did you do in your lone completed scum game here? Did you make it to the end? Did your team win?
Random from meta/his play thus far being easy to jump on.fitz wrote:Why do you Cheeto, a self-confessed "dumbfuck," think randomidget and kelbis are easy targets
I'll look at this later because I'm fukn starving right now and haven't eaten anything all day.fitz wrote:Well...what is idget doing right now? He isn't doing anything in this game. Is that one of his metatells? HIs motivation for not doing anything could be to avoid attention. His motivation for defending kelbris could be to protect a partner or garner town cred from kelbris and or other town (if kelbris were to flip town). His motivation for defending kelbris with things that can not be substantiated (that I could see) could be lazy scum just throwing out a read. idk. What's the town motivation for anything he has done?
In post 108, massive wrote:It would be a fascinating study to run, you know -- create ten new accounts, have them claim vanilla townie in their first three posts regardless of role, and see how long they survive based solely on the newbie goodwill.
FA wrote:I find it interesting that you voted sladaar for the derp post and then, after discovering that he was simply imitating, you do not change your vote or even really engage the originator of the post? Why?
Cheetory6 wrote:Kelbris feels more like new player explaining everything he does.
Not getting same vibes from Slandaar.
He could be defending someone he feels is town but doesn't know exactly how to convey why he feels that they're town. Why couldn't he be just as likely to be lazy town vs lazy scum? Is it just because he's a low content poster?fitz wrote:Well...what is idget doing right now? He isn't doing anything in this game. Is that one of his metatells? HIs motivation for not doing anything could be to avoid attention. His motivation for defending kelbris could be to protect a partner or garner town cred from kelbris and or other town (if kelbris were to flip town). His motivation for defending kelbris with things that can not be substantiated (that I could see) could be lazy scum just throwing out a read. idk. What's the town motivation for anything he has done?
In post 119, Riblet wrote:well that was a useless post and to top it off you vote a player who has requested replacement so can't even defend himself.
