Alright, let's deal with this crap.
In post 574, talah wrote:
Please don't try to pretend you're angry at me. If you're angry it's because you're not caught up and are feigning frustration.
No if I was angry with you last night it's because it was 12:30 in the morning and you were insisting I keep talking about something I really didn't feel like talking about.
In post 571, oddmusic wrote:
You asked for my answer. I gave it to you, to the best of my ability. There is, contrary to what you said in there, a more detailed read of the vettrock post than I initially gave. A very detailed read? No but the most detailed I'm going to give because I honestly don't care about that post anymore. If you had bothered to read any more than the first and last sentences of the my post, you might have noticed that.
We're talking about davesaz not vettrock. I read your entire post which you conveniently relinked for me two posts later after fucking up the link initially - which was supposed to be a link to your last post. In between I'd posted once. So thanks for the link, I probably couldn't have found what you'd just said otherwise.
To sum up, you said that dave struck you as stream of consciousness (but you'd forgotten the context) and that dave may not have laid a vote because he thought there might have been better lynches.
None of this answers my question about what you think about a player coming in out of nowhere after two days to throw support on Kaboose's wagon immediately after I voted him.
It shows me nothing of what you're thinking, you basically have no opinion except explaining your own actions.
Can you control your fake-rage and tell me what all the confusion is about?[/quote]
Fair enough. But players "coming out of nowhere" can sometimes come to surprising conclusions. Dave hadn't been involved in the game during the weekend.
Also it was a crap read on my part and I'm tired of defending it.
In post 571, oddmusic wrote:
I am well aware that you are voting me. It would be hard to miss. I am well aware that I am the leading wagon. Contrary to what you seem to believe, I am not a complete moron. The reason I stated that you could scumread me for it if you wanted was that I don't think I'm going to change your mind regardless. So your vote's not going anywhere.
Knowing nothing about me you assume my vote's not going anywhere? I'm a part of town and if others whom I think are town find a wagon which is not you a better chance for scum, I'll switch to secure a lynch. I might even compromise on someone I have a slight scumread on if I can't get a lynch on my stronger scumreads Day 1.
That's a really weak aspect and very much an attempt to appeal to emotion.[/quote]
No, I'm fairly certain you've got your mind made up about me. Maybe I'm wrong but I doubt it. I have no doubt you'd compromise on somebody, but at this stage of the Day, with me being the leading wagon, seems unlikely. So no, I'm not going to spend too much time trying to convince you to move your vote.