In post 339, Krystal Bald wrote:This looks like scumplaining.
how?
In post 339, Krystal Bald wrote:This looks like scumplaining.
In post 347, ika wrote:In post 336, Sonic Heroes wrote:In post 334, ika wrote:so who else thinks sonic heros might be scum right now?
nut up or shut the fuck up
zero patience right now
good then how about you tell me some good stuff liek who your town 3 scum reads are and why as well as your top town read
In post 352, xRECKONERx wrote:gusy idk what to do im bored
In post 354, xRECKONERx wrote:hmm like what?
In post 357, Grib wrote:Must resist urge to lynch shitty trolls.
Also, wow, it's definitely been 300+ posts and ika still hasn't done anything remotely useful. I think I've been patient enough.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: ika
In post 269, the freekazoid wrote:@Mantis:Having trouble coming up with town reads on your own? That is the only reason I can think of that you would need explicit reasons for why my other head posted town reads without them.
In post 280, the freekazoid wrote:I don't care about town reads unless I'm scum reading the person.
In post 359, Grib wrote:You know what I expect from you. It honestly isn't that much, which is why I don't understand why it's do difficult getting you to do anything.
In post 362, Krystal Bald wrote:Grib is scum for fishing for town cred with his comment about 4 scum. There's no way we'd think he was scum after he botched the number of scum in a mini that badly, right? If he was scum, he'd know exactly how many scum there are... right?!
In post 363, ika wrote:In post 359, Grib wrote:You know what I expect from you. It honestly isn't that much, which is why I don't understand why it's do difficult getting you to do anything.
cus maybe i work a ner 40 hr job and only givd like 1/10 of the orignal attention span i used to?
In post 362, Krystal Bald wrote:farside needs to explain which vote of killerjester's she found fearless, and why.
Skimmed the thread, scum is probably freekazoid/Grib/Sonic. Sonic for scumplaining, and the Jason vote is blech. Voting Jason for crappy meta but paying no attention to that one guy doing the same thing re: Reck? Yeah, Sonic is scum.
Grib is scum for fishing for town cred with his comment about 4 scum. There's no way we'd think he was scum after he botched the number of scum in a mini that badly, right? If he was scum, he'd know exactly how many scum there are... right?!
freekazoid is obvscum and should be lynched immediately.
This:
In post 269, the freekazoid wrote:@Mantis:Having trouble coming up with town reads on your own? That is the only reason I can think of that you would need explicit reasons for why my other head posted town reads without them.
And this:
In post 280, the freekazoid wrote:I don't care about town reads unless I'm scum reading the person.
Arecompletelycontradictory. farside is trying to eat her cake both ways. Her Reck case is similarly trash. Nitpicking on Reck being vague for not stating exactly what he meant, when apparently it's a sin for Mantis to ask BRantz what his two unnamed, VAGUE townreads were, is total shit! It is completely ridiculous that she does not have a wagon on her right now, every post that farside makes is completely infested with hypocrisy, it's disgusting.
In post 277, the freekazoid wrote:In post 275, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 270, xRECKONERx wrote:so ...we're just gonna ignore the fact that you said i had no reason and then I pointed out the exact sequence of events that shows my reason?
well actually, you did seem to make more of a deal of it than necessary. grib didn't *actually* say 'oh, heh it's just bs' .. he said that you should be an easy read cause he's played with you, is familiar with you. and you got all uppity upon that statement, for who knows why.
maybe i have to reread it.. but that was the gist of what i got.
anyway, look at freek's declaration about killerjester being one of his two town reads after a mere 2 posts!! a confirmation and rvs vote!
freek, i am not having trouble coming up with town reads. ? i stated my town reads loud and clear. whoever it was posting, and stating that they had town reads, should have posted WHO they were...otherwise, expect someone to ask that of you.
naked votes are not scummy.
He was fearless in his votes in my view. I see that from town more then scum.
You haven't explained your scum reads other then to call people scum that called you scum as far as I see.
In post 366, the freekazoid wrote:Oh look scum mantis bringing up the same issue over and over because she's desperate.
People can lynch this at anytime.
Or I will link meta and make Jason explain that town read better on you.
Let me know which people prefer
In post 364, Grib wrote:Is that all you've got? It's not my fault I play on a site that likes a more challenging scumteam.
In post 366, the freekazoid wrote:You may have missed the memo based on the fact I post more.
But this is a hydra account.
Brantz posted one view and I posted the other.
Also since all you do is snip at one thing repeatedly without progressing reads further beyond one issue that is not scummy and you haven't explained what makes it scummy, my vote stands.
In post 368, Krystal Bald wrote:In post 366, the freekazoid wrote:Oh look scum mantis bringing up the same issue over and over because she's desperate.
People can lynch this at anytime.
Or I will link meta and make Jason explain that town read better on you.
Let me know which people prefer
I know that you would just looooove if we dropped that point against you, but that isn't going to happen no matter how many times you try to paint us as scummy for bringing up points against you.
So you say that you think his naked vote was fearless? The one against Grib?
In post 369, Krystal Bald wrote:In post 364, Grib wrote:Is that all you've got? It's not my fault I play on a site that likes a more challenging scumteam.
You've been on mafiascum for over a year. I've also checked your game history. You've never been in a mini game on mafiascum where there have been four scum on a team together. You should seriously know better than to think that 4 scum is the norm here. I think you did it for town cred.
In post 366, the freekazoid wrote:You may have missed the memo based on the fact I post more.
But this is a hydra account.
Brantz posted one view and I posted the other.
Also since all you do is snip at one thing repeatedly without progressing reads further beyond one issue that is not scummy and you haven't explained what makes it scummy, my vote stands.
I don't believe you. You posted the first thing, then Mantis responded, then you posted the second thing attached to a response to her. If you're going to claim that you're answering for each other, be my guest, it only makes you scummier (hydras who answer for each other are not being genuine, because they don't actually know exactly what the other head was thinking, so their answer is made up).
And I haven't sniped at just one thing this game, I also said that your case on Reck was bullshit, which you neglected to mention, probably because it's true. For you to say that I've only got one point against you and attack me for that one point is a strawman.
In post 367, the freekazoid wrote:Sonic: be a doll and vote scum mantis please. Don't make me meta link people this game.
In post 370, the freekazoid wrote:We both were on at the same time. I didn't know you could do it but how do you expect 2 people on at the same time under the same account to confer about each others point and respond.
Also hello mr. vague. Why is anything you are painting scummy.
All you have is words. like scummy
ooooo look I can do that do.
everything this player is posting is scummy I'm not explaining why.
In post 370, the freekazoid wrote:Lets do facts instead of fiction. Because you know I will look.
Do you as a hydra confer about every single thing you post in thread.
Yes or no.
Don't dodge
In post 370, the freekazoid wrote:Tell you what when you actually respond to my questions I will respond to your questions.
You have yet to explain why it is scummy to have a town read on anyone at all.
Sooooo fake right now about dropping it. I said moving on beyond one fucking reason.
In post 370, the freekazoid wrote:We both were on at the same time. I didn't know you could do it but how do you expect 2 people on at the same time under the same account to confer about each others point and respond.