Going to pick up where I left off on page 9.
Thanks!
In post 214, Mantisdreamz wrote: In post 73, Sonic Heroes wrote:A couple of posts ago, you said that:
Well, it's always good to have a positive attitude towards the game.
I'm not sure how not being able to express your emotions in a healthy way leads you to conclude to vote Anti. He appears to be a positive, motivational presence, so I hope that your emotions are that of a optimistic nature as well.
Do you think that the others voting you have posted much content? Why not xRECKONERx? Would you expect more content from killerjester after your accusation that he is "scum"?
If the middle spot on a wagon is a "Magic Hellspot", how is it safe? Won't people be examining those on the middle spot in order to look for scum, if that is the case?
Can you elaborate how you identify town or scum based on entrances?
your 1st, 2nd & 3rd sentences ... you are messing around, right..?
how come you're looking so deeply into this vote of grib's when he already explained that he was flailing around in the dark, at who might have been the scum vote on him?
i actually think you guys need to do more explaining in terms of your reads, then trying to squeeze any more out of the townish looking grib. for example, all you have done up to this post, is vote grib and exclaim his name a few times
The funny thing is he later said he wasn't flailing after I directly said he was. But I think you should be clearer about why you think flailing around in the dark looks townish to you.
In post 254, the freekazoid wrote: In post 200, ActionDan wrote:
It's not THAT large. don't let the quotes fool you. That said, what in particular irks you?
I thought the things you pointed out as scummy was a big whooping yawn fest. It wasn't really scummy in my view and it just seemed like you cherry picked some quotes you could respond to without making a lot of analysis.
As far as I remember, if I cherry picked anything up to that point in time, it was quotes with substantial content, hence why the post looked rather "large". So saying something like "it wasn't really scummy" basically means you think that the people I think are scum (Grib/Dragonspawn) aren't scum. Though iirc, you at least thought dragonspawn was scum (and yes looking back, both heads pinged this one apparently). That's saying nothing of my analysis, which, I rather like!
In post 255, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 250, Grib wrote: In post 245, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 228, Grib wrote: In post 225, xRECKONERx wrote:OH GOOD ANOTHER TOWN THAT HAS NO CLUE HOW TO USE WORDS TO EXPLAIN THEIR THOUGHTS YAYY
i fucking hate this goddamned site
The hypocricy is strong with this one.
I've fully explained anything I've felt strong enough to comment on with actual reasons, thanks, you can take your misappropriated snarkiness and shove it up your ass.
A townread is one thing, but super town? Enlighten me.
I've seen Dan play town countless time and after the last time he basically played like shit and lurked the whole way and said he was going to try to provide more content as town so he's not a hindrance last time, so that post plays along with what I expect of him, plus a lot of his thoughts in that post were things I agree w/ so it's more likely that he's coming from the same mindset as me (IE TOWN)
In post 259, the freekazoid wrote:Reck: Master of vague ladies and germ.
This is farside out.
1) played with you as both alignments where you were vague many a time
2) you don't explain what you like or agreed with about Dan's post.
Therefore your reason's are vague.
Stop fake raging.
>_> There's only 2 conclusions reached in that post among a few other comments. It doesn't take a nuclear physicist etc.
In post 265, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 262, Grib wrote: In post 255, xRECKONERx wrote:I've seen Dan play town countless time and after the last time he basically played like shit and lurked the whole way and said he was going to try to provide more content as town so he's not a hindrance last time, so that post plays along with what I expect of him, plus a lot of his thoughts in that post were things I agree w/ so it's more likely that he's coming from the same mindset as me (IE TOWN)
For clarification: what was the point of bringing up his lurky/bad play that is, so far, pretty different compared to this game?
Because he made it a SPECIFIC point at the end of last game to pick up his play after he was a crucial factor in town's loss.
In post 269, the freekazoid wrote:@Reck: Oh right because you were so clear. Wait, no you weren't. You vaguely said you agree with things he said. What things do you agree with? Since you hate being vague so much.
@Mantis:Having trouble coming up with town reads on your own? That is the only reason I can think of that you would need explicit reasons for why my other head posted town reads without them.
In post 271, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 269, the freekazoid wrote:@Reck: Oh right because you were so clear. Wait, no you weren't. You vaguely said you agree with things he said. What things do you agree with? Since you hate being vague so much.
he's scumreading Grib & Dragon
In post 274, the freekazoid wrote: In post 265, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 262, Grib wrote: In post 255, xRECKONERx wrote:I've seen Dan play town countless time and after the last time he basically played like shit and lurked the whole way and said he was going to try to provide more content as town so he's not a hindrance last time, so that post plays along with what I expect of him, plus a lot of his thoughts in that post were things I agree w/ so it's more likely that he's coming from the same mindset as me (IE TOWN)
For clarification: what was the point of bringing up his lurky/bad play that is, so far, pretty different compared to this game?
Because he made it a SPECIFIC point at the end of last game to pick up his play after he was a crucial factor in town's loss.
As I said you didn't say what you agreed with about dan. That is vague.
It's not rocket science.
ftw I think dan maybe town but for weird reason's.
What else did you think it could have been? The one comment to KJ about his grib read (which plays into my scumread on grib anyway) or the questions to ika and Klazam (which was actually accidental misinformation)?
In post 276, the freekazoid wrote: In post 271, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 269, the freekazoid wrote:@Reck: Oh right because you were so clear. Wait, no you weren't. You vaguely said you agree with things he said. What things do you agree with? Since you hate being vague so much.
he's scumreading Grib & Dragon
Can you explain why Grib is a scum read?
I explained to brants why he was a town read and DS just reads as a VI right now to me.
I would switch to Jason in a heartbeat for scum.
As for mantis her reads and reaction just feel off and desperate. Not in the I'm hunting scum and feel people are attacking me desperate but just desperate.
Like I am almost positive Reck previous to this post had said why. Even if you discount the lampshading post on page 1 or w/e he referenced it again afterwards.
In post 317, dragonspawn wrote: In post 309, JasonWazza wrote:Also Freek why is it your tunneling on Mantis when Dragon has done the exact same thing basically, and honestly just posted fluff ontop of Mantis.
this question for freek is making me feel confused on what Jason is trying to do. Here Jason is saying I am doing the same thing as mantis so why the focus on mantis. Yet sonic already answered why mantis two posts before this in 307.
both mantis and I suspected reck and kj. But instead of pushing them mantis is scum reading the people voting for him, while I'm still pushing reck and kj. So how are we completely the same? And why would Jason ask a question that was answered already?
at first I thought maybe he is trying to push my wagon. But how does attacking freek. And ignoring his response persuade him to vote for me? Human nature indicates that those who feel threatened are more likely to defend their views.
so it seems the more likely reason is he is attacking to defend mantis. Which leads to why?
I have to agree with some of this. The way Jason does go about this question would lead one to believe that Mantis and Spawn are exhibiting similar behavior when I don't see evidence of this. But it's fine to force someone else to make a comparison, even if it's a false one. And Freek's explanation doesn't count as a response to Jason as it precedes the inquiry. And the "why" part is self-explanatory. Ok this push is a bit awkward.
I don't like you turning around to attack a fairly benign post by one of your town reads (and mine for that matter)
In post 340, the freekazoid wrote:
I also have moved reck into my scum pile because some of his words do not match his actions so far this game.
But they have. At the least they are a consistent narrative. Even were he guilty of the crime of being "vague", the words he has offered (and imo, plenty and they're fine) do not betray his actions. Where do you not see this?
In post 362, Krystal Bald wrote:
Grib is scum for fishing for town cred with his comment about 4 scum. There's no way we'd think he was scum after he botched the number of scum in a mini that badly, right? If he was scum, he'd know exactly how many scum there are... right?!
freekazoid is obvscum and should be lynched immediately.
This:
In post 269, the freekazoid wrote:@Mantis:Having trouble coming up with town reads on your own? That is the only reason I can think of that you would need explicit reasons for why my other head posted town reads without them.
And this:
Are
completely
contradictory. farside is trying to eat her cake both ways. Her Reck case is similarly trash. Nitpicking on Reck being vague for not stating exactly what he meant, when apparently it's a sin for Mantis to ask BRantz what his two unnamed, VAGUE townreads were, is total shit! It is completely ridiculous that she does not have a wagon on her right now, every post that farside makes is completely infested with hypocrisy, it's disgusting.
This looks pretty good on the surface to me actually. The grib thing tho seems a bit of a stretch. I asked that question to see how newbish he was, with the answer being, n00b!
In post 369, Krystal Bald wrote: In post 364, Grib wrote:Is that all you've got? It's not my fault I play on a site that likes a more challenging scumteam.
You've been on mafiascum for over a year. I've also checked your game history. You've never been in a mini game on mafiascum where there have been four scum on a team together. You should seriously know better than to think that 4 scum is the norm here. I think you did it for town cred.
In post 366, the freekazoid wrote:You may have missed the memo based on the fact I post more.
But this is a hydra account.
Brantz posted one view and I posted the other.
Also since all you do is snip at one thing repeatedly without progressing reads further beyond one issue that is not scummy and you haven't explained what makes it scummy, my vote stands.
I don't believe you. You posted the first thing, then Mantis responded, then you posted the second thing attached to a response to her. If you're going to claim that you're answering for each other, be my guest, it only makes you scummier (hydras who answer for each other are not being genuine, because they don't actually know exactly what the other head was thinking, so their answer is made up).
And I haven't sniped at just one thing this game, I also said that your case on Reck was bullshit, which you neglected to mention, probably because it's true. For you to say that I've only got one point against you and attack me for that one point is a strawman.
re: Grib: well then! maybe less of a newb than I thought. re: freek: I actually don't think it matters if one each posted one of those contradictory quotes. It's the responsibility of the hydra to read each other's posts and one of them should have realized there would be a problem with posting something that contradicted the other
In post 376, Sonic Heroes wrote: In post 360, Krystal Bald wrote:Because scum has wayyyy more reason to complain about another player in the game than town does.
no, not really
VOTE: krystal bald
nice to see mantis was allowed to bring in a ringer to help her squirm away, but i don't think so
This is just ew.
All I can do for now. have to go. I don't actually notice much of anything from Grib/Spawn of relevance in skimming.
