ffs learn to play (assuming my prior townread of you is correct, otherwise this is more a reminder for myself not to rely on my early game reads too much when contrary evidence is presented)... I was happy with: Tier is probably town because he is relating true and valuable information about Cabd and I had the same read on Ceph. that despite the posting which I did not fully agree with he is probably town here, I was also thinking I may have been a bit harsh with Ceph. cause working in a cutthroat environment I am used to cutting people off at the knees as soon as they try to muscle in, then I have to read this from you, pretty off-putting.
I am reinforcing nothing, that just underscores how bad that read is and you should know better by now.
In post 144, xRECKONERx wrote:What's the pro-town benefit of setup speculation discussion? It's not even current setup spec -- it's setup spec from a completely unrelated game. It is not productive, it's anti-productive. It's a distraction. I don't particularly give a shit about meta or anything, so that piece of the argument falls flat for me. For me, analyzing that within the context of this game alone, it's sketchy.
At least you can admit your bias.
You don't know if there is a correlation between the roles of the prior setup and the new ones, from the roles you all said you received I suspect there is one so the discussion is not useless, there are other ways where discussion of past roles can be useful as well.
I could make the same argument for RVS you just mad for Cabd proposing that discussion, it's not productive because all of us here know how it goes, it's anti-productive, it's a distraction, it's scum indicative that you RVS voted ... (if you space the logical jumps from A to D by putting in B and C to make it look reasonable it still is absurd when you connect the dots).
I do think it's possible you are strirring things up as town and some pressure on Cabd is fine by me.
If a complete reroll of the game means "oh yeah btw we're using the same roles and shit" then the mods fucked up and I quit
In post 145, xRECKONERx wrote:
"Obviously no intent"? How is it obvious? He brought up setup speculation about a completely unrelated game that has no actual impact or anything on this game and asked for EVERY PLAYER IN THE GAME to engage in said useless bullshit setup speculation. How is that "obviously" not engaging?
Bringing that up dictates the course of the early phase of this game and that course is shitty and not productive and bullshit. It's scummy enough,
especially so early on D1
, to warrant a push.
Your defense of him is really cute though
I know cabd as a very thorough player. Wanting to understand the previous setup suits him. He wasn't doing it in a way to avoid commenting, he was just doing first things first. I've seen scumhim lurk and not contribute, but it's too early to tell if that is what he's doing,
especially so early on D1
.
"dont try to make plays or apply pressure on d1 bc it's d1"
Copper is very good scum FYI and I can back up that assertion if necessary. In hindsight, I see differences in the two games I've played with him, and I feel good about my ability to eventually read him.
Copper is very good scum FYI and I can back up that assertion if necessary. In hindsight, I see differences in the two games I've played with him, and I feel good about my ability to eventually read him.
Copper is very good scum FYI and I can back up that assertion if necessary. In hindsight, I see differences in the two games I've played with him, and I feel good about my ability to eventually read him.
What is your current read on copper?
Ambivalent for now, but call me when he starts walling.
Copper is very good scum FYI and I can back up that assertion if necessary. In hindsight, I see differences in the two games I've played with him, and I feel good about my ability to eventually read him.
What is your current read on copper?
Ambivalent for now, but call me when he starts walling.
Because you can read him when he does or because he's scum if he does?
In post 193, xRECKONERx wrote:just gonna not interact with TierShift for the remainder of the game
I was a roleblocker who, if roleblocked, killed both myself and my roleblocker.
That seems pretty strange given there wasn't any other roleblocker claim.
In post 148, Cephrir wrote:notscience, any commentary relevant to the actual game events?
Copper looks town
I think someone lied about hteir prior role which would probably make cabd town
I think LLD looks like scum
More elaboration on this after I get some food in me, I'm not exactly lucid
In post 179, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:our previous roles were claimed by Who earlier in this game. Page 5 I think? I CBA'd to find and quote it, but he wasn't lying.
This bugs me because why does scum need 2 investigative roles and a bulletproof?
In post 185, Iecerint wrote:I'm not sure about this, but Mala is pretty insistent.
Notscience, could you speak to why you were somewhat demotivated going into this game?
You may decline to answer.
Yes, I will answer, but my only answer will be yes.
