To see how he reacts to four people voting for him.
By my count there are only 3 votes on him, but the fact that you would be willing to put someone at L-1 this early concerns me especially in a game with new players. If that were the case all it would take is one dumb town to quick lynch someone with very little information, thus making them look extremely suspicious going in to the next day if the lynch turned up town. It would leave town in a very awkward position. A dumb mafia could also make the play but it would just be suicide for them at that point.
In post 40, Tetaes wrote:Well, He could be curious.
Buuut, Let's cut it there. I'm sure you are thinking he's probably scum.
I would probably agree that he's finding every oppritunity to get someone killed.
BUT, still. It COULD be for curiosity's sake
Tetas, if you think pistacion is so scummy why are you voting elsewhere?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
To see how he reacts to four people voting for him.
By my count there are only 3 votes on him, but the fact that you would be willing to put someone at L-1 this early concerns me especially in a game with new players. If that were the case all it would take is one dumb town to quick lynch someone with very little information, thus making them look extremely suspicious going in to the next day if the lynch turned up town. It would leave town in a very awkward position. A dumb mafia could also make the play but it would just be suicide for them at that point.
So do you think it's scum or town?
An ambitious scum who unknowingly puts the spotlight on themselves early or a town that isn't entirely sure how the game works. Still neutral on her until I see more play because I could see people claiming ignorance in these games saying that they don't know better so they can slide through the game.
In post 60, Nero Cain wrote:Tetas, if you think pistacion is so scummy why are you voting elsewhere?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 61, Ilhom wrote:An ambitious scum who unknowingly puts the spotlight on themselves early or a town that isn't entirely sure how the game works. Still neutral on her until I see more play because I could see people claiming ignorance in these games saying that they don't know better so they can slide through the game.
He's clearly aware of the concept of L-1 though, and he unvotes because he doesn't want a mislynch
In post 62, Tetaes wrote:Ok, Here we go!
...
Ummmm..... Tatsuya has a japanese name?
Uhhh.... Umm..... You know what? Screw it.
I'm going with my guts.
VOTE: Ilhom
Why Ilhom? You've never even hinted a suspicion against him before
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 60, Nero Cain wrote:Tetas, if you think pistacion is so scummy why are you voting elsewhere?
Well, The reason I voted Megalo was actually that 'it' has a Miku avatar. (Which reminds you, happened wayyyyy before the pistacion incident)
But, personally, by seeing from how he reacted. I don't think he's scum. I think he's just 'a town that isn't entirely sure how the game works'.
Also, The 'Voting Ilhom' thing is completely with my guts. I think I would probably change it in the future anyways.
PS: Wow, I NEVER see anybody EVER wrote my name right before! (Like, any site. Ever.)
PSS:
In post 61, Ilhom wrote:An ambitious scum who unknowingly puts the spotlight on themselves early or a town that isn't entirely sure how the game works. Still neutral on her until I see more play because I could see people claiming ignorance in these games saying that they don't know better so they can slide through the game.
He's clearly aware of the concept of L-1 though, and he unvotes because he doesn't want a mislynch
Right pistachi0n?
That was my thought when I first saw the original post, and the fact she unvoted was comforting so it makes me want to learn more towards the town who isn't entirely sure how the game works. I am still neutral towards her because it doesn't take away the fact that, as a scum, she can make that play and possibly claim ignorance of a new player. I do like her 41
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
