Corpse Party Mafia [WRONG END]

White Narcissus · Post Post #1300 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:03 am

You know what, fuck it, we've already used up a lot of our precious time.
VOTE: Shadowcat
I haven't seen wisdom online to discuss it, but if we don't take initiative doubt anyone's going to do anything.
~Sakura

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1301 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:06 am

For the record, we have already ticked over into the third 48-hour phase. We have about 40 hours before we hit the next 48-hour mark.

So yes, while we've already used up a decent amount of time, there's no difference between lynching now and, say, 35 hours from now in terms of darkness gained.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1302 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:07 am

Eh? I haven't been checking, but does that include the 24 hour extension we had?

White Narcissus · Post Post #1303 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:07 am

~Sakura

Mikazuki · Post Post #1304 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:10 am

In post 1299, White Narcissus wrote:
In post 1296, Mikazuki wrote:What does Skold's reads have to do with Shadow?

While i still don't like either of the 2, Shadowcat hasnt done anything except complain about activity and say that their activity levels are "normal" for that head (Huntress). They said they need to reread the game to see what they saw on Zelink, but why didn't they explain it before they forgot? When they still were being asked a gazillion of times? And if they have time to complain about activity they have time to read Zelink's ISO and find what they had found, on the other hand Skold's post shows him at least taking stances on what's happened on D2.
~Sakura
PEdit: Agree with Zelink.

Me not really liking Skold's post is because of his reasoning (although that could still change), whereas Shadow's attitude is what made me change my mind. You can't really compare those posts head on, they're quite different. Shadow's 'complaining' feels more likely to be coming from frustrated town than defensive/panicking scum to me, although you are free to dismiss this as just a gut read.

Mikazuki · Post Post #1305 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:11 am

I'd really like to see Shadow/Huntress' explanation on why she doesn't like Zelink's posts since we have some time. That way, even if she gets lynched, we at least have detailed reads from a confirmed town player we can take into consideration on Day 3.

Mikazuki · Post Post #1306 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:12 am

In post 1302, White Narcissus wrote:Eh? I haven't been checking, but does that include the 24 hour extension we had?

Where's my brain? I was meaning to ask Pieguyn about this earlier. It wasn't clear whether or not the extension includes the darkness mechanic.

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #1307 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:12 am

conf town?

Mikazuki · Post Post #1308 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:13 am

In post 1305, Mikazuki wrote:I'd really like to see Shadow/Huntress' explanation on why she doesn't like Zelink's posts since we have some time. That way, even if she gets lynched, we at least have detailed reads from a confirmed town player we can take into consideration on Day 3.

Gets lynched and flips town*

SXTLHGaiden · Post Post #1309 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:14 am

In post 2, pieguyn wrote:
Setup:

At the end of each Day phase, every player will gain 1% Darkness for each 48 hours that passed over the course of that Day phase. In the case that I need to extend deadline for whatever reason, any hours added to the deadline will not count towards this, and will be considered to precede standard hours.

Mikazuki · Post Post #1310 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:14 am

In post 1309, SXTLHGaiden wrote:
In post 2, pieguyn wrote:
Setup:

At the end of each Day phase, every player will gain 1% Darkness for each 48 hours that passed over the course of that Day phase. In the case that I need to extend deadline for whatever reason, any hours added to the deadline will not count towards this, and will be considered to precede standard hours.

Ah crap. So we have like 20ish hours then?

ZZZX · Post Post #1311 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:17 am

In post 1274, Mikazuki wrote:I'm not sure how to feel about ZZZX at this point. Not really reading the entire thread or giving reasoned reads indicates to me a lack of willingness to scum hunt which is not a good look. Still, I'll keep an eye out for you participating in discussions from now on.

Correction: I am unskilled at reading parts of game where I did not participate in.

Gona answer the rest of questions as I read along.

ZZZX · Post Post #1312 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:18 am

In post 1272, Shadowcat wrote:Who is "everybody", and what reasons have they given? And what do you think of those reasons?

I will get to that in a sec

Mikazuki · Post Post #1313 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:18 am

In post 1311, ZZZX wrote:
In post 1274, Mikazuki wrote:I'm not sure how to feel about ZZZX at this point. Not really reading the entire thread or giving reasoned reads indicates to me a lack of willingness to scum hunt which is not a good look. Still, I'll keep an eye out for you participating in discussions from now on.

Correction: I am unskilled at reading parts of game where I did not participate in.

Gona answer the rest of questions as I read along.

Cool, be sure to participate lots from now on then, mmkay?

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1314 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:21 am

My understanding of post #2 is that the additional 24 hours granted did not count towards the 48-hour ticks. Though it's probably a good idea to verify that (since it's the difference between 40 hours and 16 hours left).

@pieguy

Could you please clarify whether the 24-hour extension affected the 48-hour ticks?

This is what I'm assuming the deadline until the next tick is...

Imagine being the poor janitor at Heavenly Host Elementary School. Life would suck. I mean... If he or she is even alive in the first place...

Pseudo-Votecount 2.6

Shadowcat (5)

: White Narcissus, SXTLHGaiden, Zymf, Mikazuki, Ankamius

Skold (2)

: Thor and Loki, notscience

ZeL1nK2 (1)

: Shadowcat

Thor and Loki (1)

: ZeL1nK2

notscience (1)

: Skold

Not Pseudo-Voting (2)

: ZZZX, Witness Protection

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to Pseudo-lynch. We're aiming for a lynch within (expired on 2015-04-10 00:00:30).

Spoiler: DAY ONE PSEUDO-VOTECOUNTS

Spoiler: DAY TWO PSEUDO-VOTECOUNTS

Sakura Hana · Post Post #1315 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:22 am

I'd say we have (expired on 2015-04-09 00:00:30) until the 3rd tick.
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1316 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:24 am

In post 1315, Sakura Hana wrote:I'd say we have (expired on 2015-04-09 00:00:30) until the 3rd tick.
~Sakura

Also we're better off assuming it's earlier rather than later, it does say any deadline extensions are added beforehand giving us extra time until the first tick, which means the first tick was counted 3 days into the game. Or isn't this why you asked for a deadline extension? I thought it was.
~Sakura

White Narcissus · Post Post #1317 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:24 am

Goddamit now im scumreading Zelink again
~Sakura

Mikazuki · Post Post #1318 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:25 am

In post 1311, ZZZX wrote:
Correction: I am unskilled at reading parts of game where I did not participate in.

So do you usually not read parts of games that you missed or...?

ZZZX · Post Post #1319 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:26 am

In post 1281, Skold wrote:
D2
analysis. This spoiler will be large and if you don't really care about what I have to say which I would hardly blame you for at this point then be my guest not to click this.

I'll get to reading D1 asap but I need to contribute NOW. Emboldened FOS is not a pvote I will be using pVote for my vote. Sorry in advance if this ends up being far too fucking big.

D2 starts off with the revelation that Taly is deded.

Notscience demands flavour claim WITHOUT PROVIDING HIS OWN. Flavour claim does not reveal role so I see no purpose in not giving your own if you want to start a mass flavour claim/ any flavour claim whatsoever.
pVote: Notscience

The second part makes sense but it's the first part that bothers me.
FOS

Notscience then flat out refuses to darkness claim in 889. I'd like an explanation from him. (upon revision: makes sense giving that we don't know if scum know darkness levels.)

ZeL1nK continues to be useful. I see how scum can mask being useful for the purpose of appearing town but I feel that even if it's the case it'll lead us to itself soon enough. I especially don't see scum pointing town towards enforced psuedovotes, I feel scum would be happy watching people slip up, adding darkness wherever they could.

903 Agrees with Sakura's suggestion of mass flavour claim yet still doesn't provide it himself. Maybe it's just me but if you want a massclaim you've got to be the one to initiate it.

In it's next post Ze refuses to reveal the so called ''mystery'' behind it's reads. It then says that an explanation would be spoon-feeding they (I'm feeling they is grammatically incorrect in this sentence, pronoun help?).
FOS

Mikazuki then goes on to give a reads list, with some good reasoning on Loki and Anka. Townlean.

Wis gives some commentary on Zelink + Nacho that made sense once I went back to D1. Townlean.

This is unfinished but needs posted now. Sorry, I was called away for a vacation I wasn't informed of (parents told me to pack my bags about 30 minutes before I had to go.)
I don't see why you'd take my word seriously seeing as I'm the only one who feels bad about notscience. Unsure as to when I can post again so I'll leave my VT claim
HERE
. This will go down as my worst town play ever. GJ me, GJ.

NS's action made sense . if you think about it then why would he claim first unless people agree to claim? Wouldnt be nice to claim alone you know.

and honestly mass claim can be useful but isnt something to base off your whole game on. I find what he did fine. On another note i see you claimed here but what is your favor? if u have posted it later then dont reply and I will continue checking ur posts in a moment.

White Narcissus · Post Post #1320 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:26 am

Also ZZZX is still town due to the weird read progression lufan had with him after what wis mentioned (Despite how much wis disagrees with me on that)
~Sakura

ZZZX · Post Post #1321 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:27 am

In post 1318, Mikazuki wrote:
In post 1311, ZZZX wrote:
Correction: I am unskilled at reading parts of game where I did not participate in.

So do you usually not read parts of games that you missed or...?

I try it. It depends on howmany people I know/am able to read. and how emotionally/personally invested in the game I am in. I have no problems reading up to 5 pages to the front./back but after that i begin to lose interest/get bored/get lost.

But I will try to eventually catch up

ZeL1nK2 · Post Post #1322 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:27 am

In post 1316, White Narcissus wrote:
In post 1315, Sakura Hana wrote:I'd say we have (expired on 2015-04-09 00:00:30) until the 3rd tick.
~Sakura

Also we're better off assuming it's earlier rather than later, it does say any deadline extensions are added beforehand giving us extra time until the first tick, which means the first tick was counted 3 days into the game. Or isn't this why you asked for a deadline extension? I thought it was.
~Sakura

That is why I asked, but I'm not certain what post #2 is saying.

I assumed we have 40 hours to the next tick but post #2 could be saying 48-hour ticks still count as normal but after the initial day deadline has passed, no additional darkness will be accrued. It's not clear.

Either way, pieguy should clarify.

ZZZX · Post Post #1323 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:29 am

All in all I find that Skold's posts have a small problem of being legit looking while they are not really that deep. He looks like he is doing something while he isnt. Personally Since I have failed to catch up on alot I guess you can say I look similiar but the differance is that I ADMIT and KNOW I wasnt doing anything and I am trying right now. So far noone of the points skold used makes sense. Add an incomplete random claim (...ok?) to the mix and you get the point.

ZZZX · Post Post #1324 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:30 am

In post 1313, Mikazuki wrote:
In post 1311, ZZZX wrote:
In post 1274, Mikazuki wrote:I'm not sure how to feel about ZZZX at this point. Not really reading the entire thread or giving reasoned reads indicates to me a lack of willingness to scum hunt which is not a good look. Still, I'll keep an eye out for you participating in discussions from now on.

Correction: I am unskilled at reading parts of game where I did not participate in.

Gona answer the rest of questions as I read along.

Cool, be sure to participate lots from now on then, mmkay?

sure