No, only two of them. If you'd read my summary you would know this.
In post 1279, ZeL1nK2 wrote:Out of interest, Shadowcat, could you point me to other games you've played where your reads have been entirely gut that you've been unable to explain?
And also, perhaps, one or two of your most recent scum games.
I don't recall any game where my reads have been entirely gut reads. A gut read by definition is difficult to explain because once the cause becomes obvious it's no longer just a gut read. All my games are listed on the wiki under
Huntress with a note of my alignment.
In post 1284, ZeL1nK2 wrote:I'd like to see something along the lines of, "these are posts I don't like from ZeL1nK and here is why." I mean if you were to ask me to look at a 200-post ISO and talk about which posts I do or don't like, it would maybe take me... half an hour at most?
This proves you either haven't read my posts, or are hoping that others haven't read them. I stated quite clearly that it was more than just your ISO, it was the context that I needed to go over. If it was just the ISO I would have done it before now.
I was going to quote more bits from
1284 but I decided not to. I will just say that I found parts of it arrogant and even insulting, and leave it at that. Just remember that not everyone has the ability to deal with stuff at the speed you claim to be able to.
In post 1286, Mikazuki wrote:Huntress, would you be willing to explain your reads independent of Mala then?
I'm always willing to explain what I can.
In post 1298, ZeL1nK2 wrote:I probably wouldn't care in another game with, say, two-week deadlines.
This game did come with a two week, and then ten day, deadlines. I wouldn't have joined it if it had come with the very short times that you are trying to push.